Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment satisfaction of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the psychometric properties of the Greek Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ) and evaluate the factors that influence treatment satisfaction of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods

The MacTSQ was translated into Greek and administered to 176 patients. All patients completed the SF-12 Health Survey and the Macular disease Dependent Quality of Life Questionnaire (MacDQoL) and underwent vision measurements. For test–retest reliability, a subset of 19 participants completed the MacTSQ twice, two weeks apart. Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of treatment satisfaction. Change in MacTSQ scores over time was assessed on 83 patients who completed the MacTSQ at a follow-up visit, one year later.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficients between the first and second test–retest administration ranged from 0.88 to 0.98 for the items and total score. Internal reliability of the total score was adequate (Cronbach’s a = 0.837). Principal component analysis revealed three subscales (effectiveness, information provision and convenience, impact). The MacTSQ score showed significant correlations with SF-12 summary scales and MacDQoL scores (ρ = 0.16–0.27). The most important factor that determined the satisfaction was mental health. Distance visual acuity (VA) in better eye was the best predictor of the effectiveness subscale, and the total number of injections was a negative predictor for the convenience subscale. Treatment satisfaction increased at one-year follow-up, despite the deterioration in distance VA.

Conclusions

The Greek MacTSQ is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing nAMD patients’ perceptions of treatment satisfaction, especially using its three new subscales. Treatment satisfaction is multifactorial and was primarily determined by patients’ mental health status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bourne RR, Jonas JB, Flaxman SR, Keeffe J, Leasher J, Naidoo K, Parodi MB, Pesudovs K, Price H, White RA, Wong TY, Resnikoff S, Taylor HR, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study (2014) Prevalence and causes of vision loss in high-income countries and in Eastern and Central Europe: 1990–2010. Br J Ophthalmol 98:629–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell J, Bradley C (2006) Quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:97. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cimarolli VR, Casten RJ, Rovner BW, Heyl V, Sörensen S, Horowitz A (2015) Anxiety and depression in patients with advanced macular degeneration: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 10:55–63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) Research Group, Maguire MG, Martin DF, Ying GS, Jaffe GJ, Daniel E, Grunwald JE, Toth CA, Ferris FL 3rd, Fine SL (2016) Five-year outcomes with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Ophthalmology 123:1751–1761. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holz FG, Tadayoni R, Beatty S, Berger A, Cereda MG, Cortez R, Hoyng CB, Hykin P, Staurenghi G, Heldner S, Bogumil T, Heah T, Sivaprasad S (2015) Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 99(2):220–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Finger RP, Wiedemann P, Blumhagen F, Pohl K, Holz FG (2013) Treatment patterns, visual acuity and quality-of-life outcomes of the WAVE study—a noninterventional study of ranibizumab treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Germany. Acta Ophthalmol 91(6):540–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Souied EH, Oubraham H, Mimoun G, Cohen SY, Quere S, Derveloy A, TWIN Study Group (2015) Changes in visual acuity in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal ranibizumab in daily clinical practice: the TWIN study. Retina 35:1743–1749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyle J, Vukicevic M, Koklanis K, Itsiopoulos C (2015) Experiences of patients undergoing anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review. Psychol Health Med 20(3):296–310. doi:10.1080/13548506.2014.936886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Senra H, Ali Z, Balaskas K, Aslam T (2016) Psychological impact of anti-VEGF treatments for wet macular degeneration-a review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254:1873–1880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Droege KM, Muether PS, Hermann MM, Caramoy A, Viebahn U, Kirchhof B, Fauser S (2013) Adherence to ranibizumab treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in real life. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(5):1281–1284. doi:10.1007/s00417-012-2177-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodríguez Ramírez M, del Barrio Manso MI, Martín Sánchez MD (2014) Intravitreal injections: what do patients prefer? Analysis of patient’s satisfaction and preferences about where to perform intravitreal injections. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 89(12):477–483. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2014.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell J, Brose LS, Bradley C (2007) Design of a measure of satisfaction with treatment for macular degeneration (MacTSQ). Qual Life Res A-120:2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chakravarthy U, Harding SP, Rogers CA, Downes SM, Lotery AJ, Culliford LA, Reeves BC, IVAN study investigators (2013) Alternative treatments to inhibit VEGF in age-related choroidal neovascularisation: 2-year findings of the IVAN randomised controlled trial. Lancet 382:1258–1267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amoaku WM, Gale RP, Lotery AJ, Menon G, Sivaprasad S, Petrillo J, Quinn J (2015) Treatment satisfaction and well-being in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization treated with ranibizumab in the REPAIR study. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0128403. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128403

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gohil R, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Forbes A, Burton BJ, Hykin P, Sivaprasad S (2016) Treatment satisfaction of patients undergoing ranibizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in a real-life setting. Patient Prefer Adherence 10:949–955. doi:10.2147/PPA.S105536

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Boyle J, Vukicevic M, Koklanis K, Itsiopoulos C, Rees G (2017) Experiences of patients undergoing repeated intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Psychol Health Med 9:1–21. doi:10.1080/13548506.2016.1274040

    Google Scholar 

  17. Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Harris A, Anastasopoulos E, Yu F, Koskosas A, Pappas T, Mavroudis L, Wilson MR (2006) Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Greece: the Thessaloniki Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol 142:1076–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Owen CG, Jarrar Z, Wormald R, Cook DG, Fletcher AE, Rudnicka AR (2012) The estimated prevalence and incidence of late stage age related macular degeneration in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol 96:752–756. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chatziralli I, Mitropoulos P, Parikakis E, Niakas D, Labiris G (2016) Risk factors for poor quality of life among patients with age-related macular degeneration. Semin Ophthalmol 10:1–9. [Epub ahead of print]

  20. Bradley C, Lewis KS (1990) Measures of psychological well-being and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet-treated diabetes. Diabet Med 7:445–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brose LS, Bradley C (2009) Psychometric development of the retinopathy treatment satisfaction questionnaire (RetTSQ). Psychol Health Med 14:740–754. doi:10.1080/13548500903431485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wild D, Eremenco S, Mear I, Martin M, Houchin C, Gawlicki M, Hareendran A, Wiklund I, Chong LY, von Maltzahn R, Cohen L, Molsen E (2009) Multinational trials-recommendations on the translations required, approaches to using the same language in different countries, and the approaches to support pooling the data: the ISPOR patient-reported outcomes translation and linguistic validation good research practices task force report. Value Health 12:430–440. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, Tountas Y (2007) Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Marakis TP, Koutsandrea C, Chatzistefanou KI, Tountas Y (2017) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Greek MacDQoL individualized measure of the impact of macular degeneration on quality of life. Qual Life Res 26:183–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell J, Wolffsohn JS, Woodcock A, Anderson SJ, McMillan CV, Ffytche T, Rubinstein M, Amoaku W, Bradley C (2005) +Psychometric evaluation of the MacDQoL individualised measure of the impact of macular degeneration on quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:25. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I (1982) New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 94:91–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ (1988) The design of a new letter chart to measure contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 2:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horton JC, Jones MR (1997) Warning on inaccurate Rosenbaum cards for testing near vision. Surv Ophthalmol 42:169–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arditi A, Cagenello R (1993) On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34(1):120–129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dubuc S, Wittich W, Gomolin JE, Kapusta M, Overbury O (2009) Beyond visual acuity: functional outcome and patient satisfaction following treatment for age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol 44(6):680–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Au CP, Fardell N, Williams M, Fraser-Bell S, Campain A, Gillies M (2015) Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol 15:80. doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0071-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. McCloud C, Lake S (2015) Understanding the patient’s lived experience of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study. Eye (Lond) 29:1561–1569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Burton AE, Shaw RL, Gibson JM (2013) Experiences of patients with age-related macular degeneration receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: a qualitative study. Br J Vis Impair 31(3):178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thetford C, Hodge S, Hardig S, Taylor S, Knox PC (2013) Living with age-related macular degeneration treatment: patient experiences of being treated with ranibizumab (Lucentis) intravitral injections. Br J Vis Impair 31:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rifkin L, Schaal S (2012) Factors affecting patients’ pain intensity during inoffice intravitreal injection procedure. Retina 32(4):696–700. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182252ad3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Inoue M, Arakawa A, Yamane S, Kadonosono K (2014) Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab using a pro re nata regimen for age-related macular degeneration and vision-related quality of life. Clin Ophthalmol 8:1711–1716. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S68293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Finger RP, Guymer RH, Gillies MC, Keeffe JE (2014) The impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment on quality of life in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 121(6):1246–1251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Casten R, Rovner BW, Leiby BE, Tasman W (2010) Depression despite anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 128(4):506–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sloan FA, Hanrahan BW (2014) The effects of technological advances on outcomes for elderly patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 132:456–463

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Economou M, Angelopoulos E, Peppou LE, Souliotis K, Tzavara C, Kontoangelos K, Madianos M, Stefanis C (2016) Enduring financial crisis in Greece: prevalence and correlates of major depression and suicidality. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 51:1015–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bertelmann T, Feltgen N, Scheffler M, Hufenbach U, Wiedon A, Wilhelm H, Ziemssen F (2016) Vision-related quality of life in patients receiving intravitreal ranibizumab injections in routine clinical practice: baseline data from the German OCEAN study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 14:132. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0536-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the patients with age-related macular degeneration who participated in this study and the optometrist A Nikolopoulou for her valuable assistance. We are grateful to the developer of the MacTSQ Professor Clare Bradley for granting us permission to use the instrument in our study. For access to the MacTSQ and MacDQoL questionnaires in the original English, Greek or other languages, visit www.healthpsychologyresearch.com. The SF-12 Health Survey is currently available in multiple language translations. For access, visit www.optum.com/optum-outcomes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodoros P. Marakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Patient consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in our study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Athens General Hospital “G. Gennimatas” research committee (No 27130, 4/11/2011) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marakis, T.P., Koutsandrea, C., Chatzistefanou, K.I. et al. Treatment satisfaction of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Int Ophthalmol 38, 565–576 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0492-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0492-8

Keywords

Navigation