Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The factors influencing peripapillary choroidal thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether there is a difference between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and control group with regard to choroidal thickness (CT) and the factors influencing CT.

Methods

Ninety eyes of 90 patients who were being followed up with POAG and 72 eyes of 72 healthy subjects matched for age and gender were included. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), peripapillary CT, lamina cribrosa thickness (LCT), and prelaminar tissue thickness (PTT) were measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) enhanced depth imaging (EDI) in all patients.

Results

According to multi-variable linear regression analysis results, the factors influencing CT were found as axial length (AL) (B = −22.78, p = 0.002), intraocular pressure (IOP) (B = −7.95, p = 0.001), age (B  = −1.77, p = 0.009), and radial pulse rate (B  = 1.42, p = 0.015). A statistically significant relationship was not detected between CT and central corneal thickness, mean deviation value of visual field, cup/disk ratio, RNFLT, LCT, PTT. CT was found significantly thinner in glaucoma group (147.5 ± 61.2 μm) compared to control group (167.1 ± 37.3 μm). However, IOP was found significantly higher (p < 0.001) and pulse rate was found significantly lower (p = 0.021) in POAG group. IOP and pulse rate were considered to have affected CT difference between the groups. In advanced and worser stage patients, there were significant positive correlations between CT and RNFLT in inferior and superior quadrants.

Conclusions

In addition to previous studies, IOP and pulse rate were detected to be effective on CT. Further studies are required for determining the whole factors effective on CT and better understanding CT and glaucoma relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP (2008) Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ 86:63–70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Quigley HA, Broman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 90:262–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT (2006) Primary open angle glaucoma. Lancet 363:1711–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garway-Heath DF (2008) Early diagnosis in glaucoma. Prog Brain Res 173:47–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flammer J, Orgül S, Costa VP, Orzalesi N, Krieglstein GK, Serra LM, Renard JP, Stefánsson E (2002) The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 21:359–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cioffi GA, Wang L, Fortune B, Cull G, Dong J, Bui B, Van Buskirk EM (2004) Chronic ischemia induces regional axonal damage in experimental primate optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1517–1525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchsjäger-Mayrl G, Wally B, Georgopoulos M, Rainer G, Kircher K, Buehl W, Amoako-Mensah T, Eichler HG, Vass C, Schmetterer L (2004) Ocular blood flow and systemic blood pressure in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:834–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugiyama K, Gu ZB, Kawase C, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y (1999) Optic nerve and peripapillary choroidal microvasculature of the rat eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:3084–3090

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin ZQ, Vaegan Millar TJ, Beaumont P, Sarks S (1997) Widespread choroidal insufficiency in primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 6:23–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC (2008) Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 146:496–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeyen T, Roche M, Brigatti L, Caprioli J (1995) Formulas for conversion between Octopus and Humphrey threshold values and indices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:627–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, Evans SJ, Doyle JJ (2006) Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol 141:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li L, Bian A, Zhou Q, Mao J (2013) Peripapillary choroidal thickness in both eyes of glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 156:1277–1284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park HY, Lee NY, Shin HY, Park CK (2014) Analysis of macular and peripapillary choroidal thickness in glaucoma patients by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 23:225–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maul EA, Friedman DS, Chang DS, Boland MV, Ramulu PY, Jampel HD, Quigley HA (2011) Choroidal thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography: factors affecting thickness in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology 118:1571–1579

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chung HS, Sung KR, Lee KS, Lee JR, Kim S (2014) Relationship between the lamina cribrosa, outer retina, and choroidal thickness as assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Korean J Ophthalmol 28:234–240

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakraborty R, Read SA, Collins MJ (2011) Diurnal variations in axial length, choroidal thickness, intraocular pressure and ocular biometrics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:5121–5129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown JS, Flitcroft DI, Ying GS, Francis EL, Schmid GF, Quinn GE, Stone RA (2009) In vivo human choroidal thickness measurements: evidence for diurnal fluctuations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:5–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirooka K, Tenkumo K, Fujiwara A, Baba T, Sato S, Shiraga F (2012) Evaluation of peripapillary choroidal thickness in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 12:29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ehrlich JR, Peterson J, Parlitsis G, Kay KY, Kiss S, Radcliffe NM (2011) Peripapillary choroidal thickness in glaucoma measured with optical coherence tomography. Exp Eye Res 92:189–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zengin MO, Cinar E, Karahan E, Tuncer I, Yilmaz S, Kocaturk T, Kucukerdonmez C (2015) Choroidal thickness changes in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Int Ophthalmol 35:513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Toprak I, Yaylalı V, Yildirim C (2016) Age-based analysis of choroidal thickness and choroidal vessel diameter in primary open-angle glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 36:171–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author contribution

Mehmet Giray Ersoz: Study organization, optic coherence tomography measurement, writing. Duygu Kunak Mart: Optic coherence tomography performing. Emre Ayintap: Writing. Leyla Hazar: Literature investigation. Irfan Botan Guneş: Glaucoma patients recruiting. Seda Karaca Adıyeke: Healthy subjects recruiting. Beysim Doğan: Study orginazation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Giray Ersoz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ersoz, M.G., Mart, D.K., Ayintap, E. et al. The factors influencing peripapillary choroidal thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 37, 827–833 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0346-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0346-9

Keywords

Navigation