Skip to main content
Log in

Clinicopathological profile of orbital exenteration: 14 years of experience from a tertiary eye care center in South India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to describe the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients who underwent orbital exenteration at a tertiary eye care center in south India. Retrospective chart reviews were performed on all patients undergoing orbital exenteration from January 1999 to December 2012. Parameters recorded include demographic data, clinical presentations, past medical or surgical interventions, exenteration notes, histopathological diagnosis, adjunctive treatment, follow-up examination findings, recurrences, complications, and their management. Orbital exenteration was performed on 119 orbits of 119 patients over a 14-year period. The mean age was 48.9 years (range 1–82 years). The indications were malignancies in 90.7 % (108/119), while 9.3 % (11/119) of cases were exenterated for non-malignant indications. Among the malignancies, the commonest tissue of origin was conjunctiva, noted in 45.4 % (49/108), followed by eyelids (25.9 %, 28/108), orbit (19.4 %, 21/108), and intraocular tissues (9.3 %, 10/108). The commonest malignancies noted in this series were an extensive ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) (44.4 %, 48/108) and sebaceous gland carcinoma of eyelids with an orbital involvement (18.5 %, 20/108). Extensive fungal granuloma (mucormycosis-4, aspergillosis-4) was the commonest (81.8 %, 9/11) indication among the non-malignant group. All complications were wound related, and none had a recurrence at a mean follow-up of 12.8 months. Extensive orbital involvement with OSSN and SGC were the commonest indications for exenteration. There is a need of creating awareness among general ophthalmologists in specific geographical regions regarding early diagnosis, standardized protocols of management, and appropriate referral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartisch G (1583) Ophthalmodoulcia. Dresden 3:208

  2. Rahman I, Cook AE, Leatherbarrow B (2005) Orbital exenteration: a 13 year Manchester experience. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1335–1340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shields JA, Shields CL, Demirci H, Honavar SG, Singh AD (2001) Experience with eyelid-sparing orbital exenteration. The 2000 Tullos O Coston Lecture. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 17:355–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartley GB, Garity JA, Waller RR, Henderson JW, Ilstrup DM (1989) Orbital exenteration at Mayo clinic 1967–1986. Ophthalmology 96:468–473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pushker N, Kashyap S, Balasubramanya R et al (2004) Pattern of orbital exenteration in a tertiary eye care center in India. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 32:51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohr C, Esser J (1997) Orbital exenteration: surgical and reconstructive strategies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:288–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levin PS, Dutton JJ (1991) A 20 year series of orbital exenteration. Am J Ophthalmol 112:496–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rathbun JE, Beard C, Quickert MH (1971) Evaluation of 48 cases of orbital exenteration. Am J Ophthalmol 72:191–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Naquin HA (1954) Exenteration of orbit. Arch Ophthalmol 51:850–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mouriaux F, Martinot V, Pellerin P, Patenotre P, Rouland JF, Constantinides G (1999) Survival after malignant tumors of the orbit and periorbita treated with exenteration. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77:326–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soysal HG (2010) Orbital exenteration: a ten year experience of a general oncology hospital. Orbit 29:135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nassab RS, Thomas SS, Murray D (2007) Orbital exenteration for advanced periorbital skin cancers: 20 years experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:1103–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maheshwari R (2010) Review of orbital exenteration from an eye care center in western India. Orbit 29:35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaur A, Khattri M, Jaiswal V (2012) Pattern of orbital exenteration at a tertiary eye care center in North India. Nepal J Ophthalmol 4:64–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simons JN, Robinson DW, Masters FW (1996) Malignant tumors of the orbit and periorbital structures treated with exenteration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996(37):100–104

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spaeth EB (1971) Information learned from 50 years of orbital exenteration. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 91:611–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kennedy RE (1979) Indications and surgical techniques for orbital exenteration. Ophthalmology 86:967–973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Putterman AM (1986) Orbital exenteration with spontaneous granulation. Arch Ophthalmol 104:139–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shields JA, Shields CL, Suvarnamani C, Tantisira M, Shah P (1991) Orbital exenteration with eyelid sparing: indications, techniques and results. Ophthal Surg 22:292–297

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong JC, Thampy R, Cook A (2014) Life expectancy following orbital exenteration. Br J Ophthalmol (Epub)

  21. Lee PS, Sedrak P, Guha-Thakurta N et al (2014) Imaging findings of recurrent tumors after orbital exenteration and free flap reconstruction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 30:315–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the help of Ms. Sabera Banu in literature search and the provisions of it thereof.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Javed Ali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

This study has been reviewed by the ethics committee and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M.J., Pujari, A., Dave, T.V. et al. Clinicopathological profile of orbital exenteration: 14 years of experience from a tertiary eye care center in South India. Int Ophthalmol 36, 253–258 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0111-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0111-5

Keywords

Navigation