Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deep sclerectomy with supraciliary hema implant (Esnoper® V-2000): results and complications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 18 February 2015

Abstract

The aim was to report the results of deep sclerectomy (DS) with supraciliary hema implant and the influence of the surgical complications on intraocular pressure (IOP). Forty-eight eyes of 41 patients with open angle glaucoma (OAG), who underwent DS with supraciliary hema implant (Esnoper® V-2000), were included in this study. A significant IOP reduction was observed, changing from a preoperative mean of 24.6 ± 6.33 mmHg to 16.5 ± 4.4 mmHg (p < 0.001) at 12 months and 16.1 ± 3.4 mmHg (p < 0.001), at 24 months. Similarly, a significant reduction in the number of glaucoma drugs needed was observed, varying from 2.71 to 0.22 (p < 0.001) and 0.4 (p < 0.001), 1 and 2 years after surgery. Goniopuncture with the Nd:Yag Laser was performed in 30 eyes (62.5 %) with a mean time between the surgery and the procedure of 150 days, producing a mean IOP reduction of 4.0 mmHg (p < 0.001). The main intraoperative complications were microperforation of the trabeculodescemetic membrane (TDM) in 1 eye (2.08 %) The main early postoperative complications were seidel at 24 h in 11 eyes (22.91 %), hyphema in 7 eyes (14.58 %), choroidal detachment in 3 eyes (6.25 %) with macular folds in 2 (4.16 %) and need for additional mitomycin injections in 2 eyes (4.16 %). All these complications were spontaneously resolved. No correlation between these complications and final IOP was found, but a significant correlation between the presence of hyphema and higher IOP 24 months postoperatively (p = 0.048) was observed. DS with supraciliary hema implant is a safe and effective technique for the management of OAG. The presence of hyphema during the first week after the surgery could be considered as a negative prognostic factor in DS with supraciliary implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muñoz G (2009) Nonstitch suprachoroidal technique for T-flux implantation in deep sclerectomy. J Glaucoma 18:262–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonilla R, Loscos J, Valldeperas X, Parera MA, Sabala A (2012) Supraciliary hema implant in combined deep sclerectomy and phacoemulsification: one year results. Open Ophthalmol J 6:59–62

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mermoud A, Shaarawy T (2001) Non penetrating glaucoma surgery. Martin Dunitz, London, p 97

    Google Scholar 

  4. Development Core Team (2011) A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed May 2012

  5. Cheng JW, Ma XY, Wei RL (2004) Efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery for open angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J. (Engl) 117:1006–1010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lachkar Y, Neverauskiene J, Jeanteur-Lunel MN et al (2004) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy: a 6-year retrospective study. Eur J Ophthalmol 14:26–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ravinet E, Bovey E, Mermoud A (2004) T-Flux implant versus Healon GV in deep sclerectomy. J Glaucoma 13:46–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leszczyński R, Formińska-Kapuścik M, Bubała-Stachowicz B, Mrukwa-Kominek E, Filipek E, Pawlicki K (2012) Nonpenetrating very deep sclerectomy with hyaluronic acid implant vs trabeculectomy—a 2-year follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250:1835–1841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grieshaber MC, Schoetzau A, Flammer J, Orgül S (2013) Postoperative microhyphema as a positive prognostic indicator in canaloplasty. Acta Ophthalmol 91(2):151–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koch JM, Heiligenhaus A, Heinz C (2011) Canaloplasty and transient anterior chamber haemorrhage. A prognostic factor? Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 228:465–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamel M, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A (2001) Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in patients with glaucoma and high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1410–1417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Konstas AG, Jay JL (1992) Modification of trabeculectomy to avoid postoperative hyphaema. The ‘guarded anteriorfistula’ operation. Br J Ophthalmol 76:353–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Coob CJ, Chakrabarti S, Chadha V, Sanders R (2007) The effect of aspirin and warfarin therapy in trabeculectomy. Eye 21:598–603

    Google Scholar 

  14. Figus M, Bartolomei MP, Lazzeri S, Nardi M (2011) Very deep sclerectomy. J Glaucoma 20:67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Loscos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loscos, J., Valldeperas, X., Langhor, K. et al. Deep sclerectomy with supraciliary hema implant (Esnoper® V-2000): results and complications. Int Ophthalmol 35, 693–699 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0037-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0037-y

Keywords

Navigation