Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Q-value customized ablation (custom-Q) versus wavefront optimized ablation for primary myopia and myopic astigmatism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparison between treatment with wavefront optimized and custom-Q laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablations. Our study included 400 eyes of 200 patients divided into two equal groups. All patients were treated for myopia and myopic astigmatism with LASIK. The first group was treated with wavefront optimized ablation and the second group with custom-Q ablation. They were examined preoperatively and postoperatively to assess asphericity, image quality, and other classical outcome parameters. The wavefront optimized ablation group comprised 200 eyes with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) of −5.2188 diopters (D) (range: −1.15 to −10.50 D); the mean Q-value changed from 0.30 preoperatively to 0.06 postoperatively. The custom-Q ablation group also comprised 200 eyes with a mean SE of −5.1575 D (range: −1.35 to −9.00 D); the mean Q-value changed from 0.32 preoperatively to 0.03 postoperatively. A statistically significant difference in postoperative change in Q-values (P = 0.02) and in postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.42) between the two groups was noted. There was no difference between the two groups regarding refractive correction. There was a marginally significant change in BSCVA (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) between the two groups, and less impairment in the corneal asphericity in the custom-Q group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J (1988) Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 14:46–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Verdon W, Bullimore M, Maloney RK (1996) Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 114:1465–1472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Seiler T, Kahle G, Kriegerowski M (1990) Excimer laser (193 nm) myopic keratomileusis in sighted and blind human eyes. Refract Corneal Surg 6:165–173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Brart DPS, Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW et al (1994) Disturbances in night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Eye 8:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holladay JT, Dudeja Dr, Chang J (1999) Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing, and corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:663–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seiler T, Genth U, Holschbach A, Derse M (1993) Aspheric photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser. Refract Corneal Surg 9:166–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Applegate RA, Howland HC (1997) Refractive surgery, optical aberrations, and visual performance. J Refract Surg 13:295–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seiler T, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Krinke H-E (2000) Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Arch Ophthalmol 118:17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mrochen M, Donitzky C, Wüllner C, Löffler J (2004) Wavefront-optimized oblation profiles: theoretical background. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:775–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG (2004) Subjective assessment of mesopic visual function after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17:211–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel S, Marshall J, Fitzke FW III (1993) Model for predicting the optical performance of the eye in refractive surgery. Refract Corneal Surg 9:366–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Henslee SL, Rowsey JJ (1983) New corneal shapes in keratorefractive surgery. Ophthalmology 90:245–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anera RG, Jime′nez JR, Jimenez del Barco L et al (2003) Changes in corneal asphericity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:762–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiely PM, Smith G, Carney LG (1982) The mean shape of the human cornea. Opt Acta (Lond) 29:1027–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandoval HP, de Ferna′ndez Castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD (2005) Refractive surgery survey 2004. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:221–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohnen T, Bühren J, Kühne C, Mirshahi A (2004) Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up; clinical outcome and higher order aberrations. Ophthalmology 111:2175–2185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Mostafa Eid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tawfik, A., Eid, A.M., Hasanen, R. et al. Q-value customized ablation (custom-Q) versus wavefront optimized ablation for primary myopia and myopic astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol 34, 259–262 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-013-9828-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-013-9828-1

Keywords

Navigation