Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Corneal thickness and volume in subclinical and clinical keratoconus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate corneal thickness and volume in subclinical and clinical keratoconus in Asian population with the aim of discriminating between normal and ectatic cornea. Eyes were placed into one of the following three groups: normal, subclinical, and mild–moderate keratoconus. Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging (Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany) was performed for each participant to record thinnest corneal thickness, central corneal thickness, corneal volume (CV), peripheral corneal thickness (PCT) and percentage thickness increase (PTI) at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm. The data were exported to SPSS for statistical analysis. Subjects comprised 52 normal, 15 subclinical keratoconus, and 32 mild–moderate clinical keratoconus eyes. Our results indicated that corneal thickness (CT) distribution, PTI, and CV in normal eyes were significantly different compared with subclinical and clinical keratoconus (P < .05). Overall, subclinical group exhibited lower CT distribution and volume, and higher PTI in comparison with normal eyes. However, they showed higher CT distribution and volume, and lower PTI compared with keratoconus group. In addition, there was a smaller change in PCT and PTI from the thinnest point of the cornea to the periphery. The results of the present study indicate that CT parameters and CV were significantly different in normal versus subclinical group and in normal versus keratoconus group. These findings could help clinicians to better discriminate between normal and ectatic cornea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rabinowitz YS (1998) Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 42(4):297–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zadnik K, Barr JT, Gordon MO, Edrington TB (1996) Biomicroscopic signs and disease severity in keratoconus. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) study group. Cornea 15(2):139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kennedy R, Bourne W, Dyer J (1986) A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 101(3):267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zadnik K, Steger-May K, Fink BA, Joslin CE, Nichols JJ, Rosenstiel CE, Tyler JA, Yu JA, Raasch TW, Schechtman KB (2002) Between-eye asymmetry in keratoconus. Cornea 21(7):671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chopra I, Jain AK (2005) Between eye asymmetry in keratoconus in an Indian population. Clin Exp Optom 88(3):146–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nesburn A, Bahri S, Salz J, Rabinowitz Y, Maguen E, Hofbauer J, Berlin M, Macy J (1995) Keratoconus detected by videokeratography in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg (Thorofare, NJ: 1995) 11(3):194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K (1999) KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 25(10):1327–1335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Binder PS, Lindstrom RL, Stulting RD, Donnenfeld E, Wu H, McDonnell P, Rabinowitz Y (2005) Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK. J Refract Surg 21(6):749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ambrosio RJR, Klyce SD, Wilson SE (2003) Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients. J Refract Surg 19(1):24–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson SE, Lin D, Klyce SD (1991) Corneal topography of keratoconus. Cornea 10(1):2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Piñero DP, Alió JL, Alesón A, Vergara ME, Miranda M (2010) Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(5):814–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uçakhan ÖÖ, Çetinkor V, Özkan M, Kanpolat A (2011) Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(6):1116–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bühren J, Kook D, Yoon G, Kohnen T (2010) Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(7):3424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mannion LS, Tromans C, O’Donnell C (2011) Reduction in corneal volume with severity of keratoconus. Curr Eye Res 00:1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearson A, Soneji B, Sarvananthan N, Sandford-Smith J (2000) Does ethnic origin influence the incidence or severity of keratoconus? Eye 14(4):625–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McMahon TT, Edrington TB, Szczotka-Flynn L, Olafsson HE, Davis LJ, Schechtman KB (2006) Longitudinal changes in corneal curvature in keratoconus. Cornea 25(3):296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alió JL, Shabayek MH, Artola A (2006) Intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus correction: long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(6):978–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Georgiou T, Funnell C, Cassels-Brown A, O’Conor R (2004) Influence of ethnic origin on the incidence of keratoconus and associated atopic disease in Asians and white patients. Eye 18(4):379–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Uçakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A (2006) Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(6):970–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD (2003) Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology 110(2):267–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seiler T, Quurke AW (1998) Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 24(7):1007

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li X, Yang H, Rabinowitz YS (2007) Longitudinal study of keratoconus progression. Exp Eye Res 85(4):502–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maguire LJ, Lowry JC (1991) Identifying progression of subclinical keratoconus by serial topography analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 112(1):41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ambrósio R, Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca Velarde LG (2006) Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(11):1851–1859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saad A, Gatinel D (2010) Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(11):5546–5555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meek KM, Tuft SJ, Huang Y, Gill PS, Hayes S, Newton RH, Bron AJ (2005) Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(6):1948–1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayes S, Boote C, Tuft SJ, Quantock AJ, Meek KM (2007) A study of corneal thickness, shape and collagen organisation in keratoconus using videokeratography and X-ray scattering techniques. Exp Eye Res 84(3):423–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. De Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L, Turco D, Mutani B, Grignolo FM (2008) Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmology 115(9):1534–1539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, Pesudovs K (2008) Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(1):103–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in a product, method, or material described here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Healthcare Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Seyed Mahdi Ahmadi Hosseini, Norhani Mohidin, Fereshteh Abolbashari & Bariah Mohd-Ali

  2. Sungai Buloh Hospital, Selangor, Malaysia

    Chandramalar T. Santhirathelagan

Authors
  1. Seyed Mahdi Ahmadi Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norhani Mohidin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fereshteh Abolbashari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bariah Mohd-Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chandramalar T. Santhirathelagan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fereshteh Abolbashari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmadi Hosseini, S.M., Mohidin, N., Abolbashari, F. et al. Corneal thickness and volume in subclinical and clinical keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 33, 139–145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9654-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-012-9654-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation