Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis for severe blinding vernal keratoconjunctivitis and Mooren’s ulcer

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indications for the Boston keratoprosthesis differ throughout the world depending on the prevailing regional causes of end-stage corneal disease. We report the short term anatomical and functional outcomes of the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis for severe bilaterally blinding vernal keratoconjunctivitis and Mooren’s ulcer. A retrospective chart review was conducted of 2 patients who underwent several unsuccessful ocular surface reconstruction procedures before Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation. The anatomical and visual outcomes of the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis at 1 year of follow-up were assessed clinically and by anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging. The keratoprosthesis was retained in both the eyes at 1 year postoperatively with a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/30 in both patients. To our knowledge this is the first report of successful Boston keratoprosthesis implantation for these two unusual indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Aquavella JV, Qian Y, McCormick GJ, Palakuru JR (2005) Keratoprosthesis: the Dohlman-Doane device. Am J Ophthalmol 140:1032–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldave AJ, Kamal KM, Vo RC et al (2009) The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications. Ophthalmology 116:640–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB (2006) Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis study group. Results from the multicenter Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis study. Ophthalmology 113:1779–1780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cauchi PA, Ang GS, Azuara-Blanco A et al (2008) A systematic literature review of surgical interventions for limbal stem cell deficiency in humans. Am J Ophthalmol 146:251–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang L, Sheha H, Tseng SC (2009) Long-term outcomes of keratolimbal allograft for total limbal stem cell deficiency using combined immunosuppressive agents and correction of ocular surface deficits. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1428–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Girard LJ, Hawkins RS, Nieves R et al (1977) Keratoprosthesis: a 12-year follow-up. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 83:252–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan BF, Harissi-Dagher M, Khan DM et al (2007) Advances in Boston keratoprosthesis: enhancing retention and prevention of infection and inflammation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 47:61–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sayan Basu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basu, S., Taneja, M. & Sangwan, V.S. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis for severe blinding vernal keratoconjunctivitis and Mooren’s ulcer. Int Ophthalmol 31, 219–222 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-011-9438-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-011-9438-8

Keywords

Navigation