Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chiasmal compression misdiagnosed as normal-tension glaucoma: can we avoid the pitfalls?

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Routine neuroimaging for patients with presumed normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) is a contentious issue and it has been suggested that it may be unnecessary due to the low yield for detecting intracranial pathology. However, it has also been reported that 8% of patients diagnosed with NTG have associated compressive lesions of the anterior visual pathways. We present three patients in whom the initial diagnosis of NTG was eventually revealed to be chiasmal compression secondary to a pituitary tumour. Case 1: a 79-year-old woman was treated for NTG for several months before a bitemporal haemianopia developed and imaging showed a pituitary tumour. Case 2: an 83-year-old man was treated for NTG while a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was requested routinely. This subsequently revealed a pituitary tumour. Case 3: a 52-year-old man with left inferior arcuate visual field loss plus disc pallor was treated for NTG. His visual field deteriorated over 8 years, despite his intraocular pressure (IOP) being well controlled. An MRI was eventually requested, which revealed a pituitary tumour. All of our patients had signs that, with hindsight, should have raised suspicions about the presumptive diagnosis of NTG and initiated neuroimaging at an earlier stage. Whilst compression of the anterior visual pathways is an uncommon finding in patients thought to have NTG, features such as bitemporal field loss, optic disc pallor, poor colour vision and, particularly, poor disc/field correlation should alert the clinician to the possibility of an intracranial mass lesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Greenfield DS, Siatkowski RM, Glaser JS, Schatz NJ, Parrish RK 2nd (1998) The cupped disc. Who needs neuroimaging? Ophthalmology 105(10):1866–1874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart WC, Reid KK (1992) Incidence of systemic and ocular disease that may mimic low-tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brewis M, Poskanzer DC, Rolland C, Miller H (1966) Neurological disease in an English city. Acta Neurol Scand 42(Suppl 24):1–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blazar HA, Scheie HG (1950) Pseudoglaucoma. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 44:499–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kupersmith MJ, Krohn D (1984) Cupping of the optic disc with compressive lesions of the anterior visual pathway. Ann Ophthalmol 16:948–953

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamal D, Hitchings R (1998) Normal tension glaucoma—a practical approach. Br J Ophthalmol 82:835–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pruett RC, Wepsic JG (1973) Delayed diagnosis of chiasmal compression. Am J Ophthalmol 76:229–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed II, Feldman F, Kucharczyk W, Trope GE (2002) Neuroradiologic screening in normal-pressure glaucoma: study results and literature review. J Glaucoma 11(4):279–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzannah R. Drummond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drummond, S.R., Weir, C. Chiasmal compression misdiagnosed as normal-tension glaucoma: can we avoid the pitfalls?. Int Ophthalmol 30, 215–219 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-009-9308-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-009-9308-9

Keywords

Navigation