Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease diagnostic criteria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several different sets of criteria have been proposed to establish the diagnosis of Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease (VKH). Various investigators have used the criteria proposed by Sugiura, those proposed by by the American Uveitis Society as well as the revised diagnostic criteria proposed by the First VKH International Workshop group. These three sets of criteria share several clinical features that are considered to be essential for establishing the diagnosis of VKH, including bilateral uveitis, meningismus, and other extraocular changes. The detection of cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis is considered to be an absolute in the criteria proposed by Sugiura but is not required for the diagnosis of VKH by the revised diagnostic criteria. We applied the latter diagnostic criteria to 28 well-documented patients with early phase VKH and to 88 patients examined during the late phase of VKH. All of these early and late phase patients fulfilled the criteria of the revised diagnosti c criteria proposed by the workshop group, indicating 100% concurrence. However, none of the above proposed criteria were prospectively validated to show the positive and negative predictive value of the proposed criteria. Such a prospective study should be undertaken to address the validity of any one or all of the above sets of VKH diagnostic criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Read RW, Holland GN, Rao NA, Tabbara KF, Ohno S, Arrellanes-Garcia L et al.(2001) Revised diagnostic criteria for Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada Disease: report of an international committee on nomenclature. Am J Ophthalmol 131:647–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitamura M, Takami K, Kitachi N, Namba K, Kitamei H, Kotake S et al. (2005) Comparative study of two sets of criteria for the diagnosis of Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada’s disease. Am J Ophthalmol 139:1080–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugiura S (1978) Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease. Jpn J Ophthalmol 22:9–35

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yamaki K, Hara K, Sakuragi S (2005) Application of revised diagnostic criteria for Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease in Japanese patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 49:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Snyder DA, Tessler HH (1980) Vogt–Koyanagi--Harada syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 90:69–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Read RW, Rao NA (2000) Utility of existing Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada syndrome diagnostic criteria at initial evaluation of the individual patient: a retrospective analysis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 8:227–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moorthy RS, Inomata H, Rao NA (1995) Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol 39:265–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by a grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, N.Y.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narsing A. Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, N.A., Sukavatcharin, S. & Tsai, J.H. Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease diagnostic criteria. Int Ophthalmol 27, 195–199 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-006-9021-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-006-9021-x

Keywords

Navigation