Skip to main content
Log in

Āgamārthānusāribhiḥ. Helārāja’s Use of Quotations and Other Referential Devices in His Commentary on the Vākyapadīya

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examining the function and style of the references to grammatical literature found in a substantial section of Helārāja’s Prakīrṇaprakāśa on Bhartṛhari’s third book of the Vākyapadīya, the article argues that the likely ideological motive of this commentary was to establish its mūla work firmly within the Brahmanical canon and should therefore be seen in the context of the appropriation of Bhartṛhari’s ideas on the part of the roughly contemporary Pratyabhijñā philosophers of Kashmir. Incidentally, it also touches upon the making of the Pāṇinian tradition and the relation between Helārāja and Kaiyaṭa, the Kashmiri commentator of Mahābhāṣya.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A.:

Aṣṭādhyāyī

KV:

Kāśikāvṛtti

MBh:

Vyākaraṇa Mahābhāṣya

MPr:

Mahābhāṣya Pradīpa

Ny:

Nyāsa

PrPr:

Prakīrṇaprakāśa

SāS:

Sādhanasamuddeśa

VP:

Vākyapadīya

References

Primary Sources

  • Aṣṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini, Roman Transliteration and English Translation, by Sumitra M. Katre. University of Texas Press, Austin, 1987 (First Indian edition: Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1989).

  • Cāndravyākaraṇa of Candragomin, edited by K.C. Chatterji, Deccan College, Poona, 1953, 2 vols.

  • Jainendravyākāraṇa, tasya ṭīkā Ācārya-Abhayanandipraṇītā Jainendramahāvr̥ttiḥ Pūjyapādadevanandiviracitam, edited by Shambhu Nath Tripathi and Mahadeo Chaturvedi, Bhāratīya Jnānapīṭha, Kāśī, 1956.

  • Kāśikāvṛtti of Vāmana-Jayāditya, with the commentaries Nyāsa or Pañcikā of Jinendrabuddhi and the Padamañjarī of Haradatta Miśra, edited by Dwārikā Dās Śāstri and Kālika Prasād Shukla, Sudhi Prakashan, Varanasi, 1983–85, 6 vols.

  • Mahābhāṣyapradīpa of Kaiyaṭa: see Patañjali’s Vyākaraṇa Mahābhāṣya, Chaukhamba edition.

  • Nyāsa of Jinendrabuddhi: see Kāśikāvṛtti.

  • Padamañjarī of Haradatta Miśra: see Kāśikāvṛtti.

  • Prakīrṇaprakāśa of Helārāja: see Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari with the Commentary of Helārāja, Subramania Iyer edition.

  • Uddyota of Nāgeśa: see Patañjali’s Vyākaraṇa Mahābhāṣya, Chaukhamba edition.

Vākyapadīya

  • Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari with the Commentary of Helārāja. Kāṇḍa III, Part I, critically edited by K.A. Subramania Iyer, Deccan College Monograph Series 21, Poona, 1963.

  • Vākyapadīya, Bhartṛharis. (1977). Die Mūlakārikās nach den Handschriften herausgegeben und mit einem Pāda-Index versehen, critically edited by Wilhelm Rau, Franz Steiner, Wiesbaden.

Vyākaraṇa Mahābhāṣya

  • Patañjali’s Vyākaraṇa Mahābhāṣya with Kaiyaṭa’s Pradīpa and Nāgeśa’s Uddyota, edited by B.B. Joshi et al., Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan, Delhi, 1987–88, 6 vols.

  • Patañjali, Vyākaraṇa-mahābhāṣya of Patañjali, edited by F. Kielhorn, 3 vols., Government Central Press, Bombay, 1880–85 (3rd edition: K.V. Abhyankar, BORI, Poona, 1962–72).

Studies and Translations

  • Abhyankar, K. V., & Limaye, V. P. (1965). Vākyapadīya of Śrī Bhartṛhari. Poona: University of Poona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aklujkar, A. (1974). The authorship of the Vākya-kāṇḍa-ṭīkā. Charudeva Shastri felicitation Volume (pp. 165–188). Delhi: Charudeva Shastri Felicitation Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aklujkar, A. (2009). Veda revelation according to Bhartṛhari. In M. Chaturvedi (Ed.) (pp. 1–97).

  • Aussant, E. (2009). Kāśikāvṛtti and Cāndravyākaraṇa: A comparison of the Pratyāhārasūtra section. In P. Haag & V. Vergiani (Eds.), Studies in the Kāśikāvṛtti. The section on pratyāhāras. Critical edition, translation and other contributions (pp. 191–214). Florence-Delhi: Società Editrice Fiorentina-Manohar. [Reprint Anthem Press, London, 2011].

  • Bronkhorst, J. (2008). Udbhaṭa, a Grammarian and Cārvāka. In M. Kaul & A. Aklujkar (Eds.), Linguistic traditions of Kashmir. Essays in memory of Pandit Dinanath Yaksha (pp. 281–299). New Delhi: DK Printworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, G. (1976). Pāṇini. A survey of research. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, G. (1999). Recent research in Pāṇinian studies. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, M. (2001). Vṛttisamuddeśa of Bhartṛhari’s Vākyapadīya. Delhi: Shivalik Prakashan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltschinger, V. (2007). Penser l’autorité des Écritures : la polémique de Dharmakīrti contre la notion brahmanique orthodoxe d’un Veda sans auteur; autour de Pramāṇavārttika I.213–268 et Svavṛtti. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filliozat, P.-S. (1975). Le Mahābhāṣya de Patañjali avec le Pradīpa de Kaiyaṭa et l’Uddyota de Nāgeśa, adhyāya 1, pāda 1, āhnika 1–4. Pondichéry: Institut Français d’Indologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauwallner, E. (1982). Kleine Schriften. Wiesbaden: Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giunta, P. (2009). Il buddhismo e la tradizione filosofico-grammaticale brahmanica. Il rapporto di Śāntarakṣita con Bhartṛhari alla luce delle citazioni del Vākyapadīya nel Tattvasaṅgraha e nel suo commento. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.

  • Grimal, F., Venkataraja Sarma, V., Srivatsankacharya, V., & Lakshminarasimham, S. (2006). Udāharaṇasamāhāraḥ. In Pāṇinīyavyākaraṇodāharaṇakośaḥ. The book of examples: 40,000 entries for a text (Vol. I). Tirupati: IFP/EFEO-Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha.

  • Haag, P. (2005). Le Saṃkhyāsamuddeśa du Vākyapadīya (VP 3.11) (théorie du nombre) et son commentaire le Prakīrṇaprakāśa par Helārāja. Paris: Collège de France.

  • Houben, J. (1995). The Saṃbandha-samuddeśa (Chapter on Relation) and Bhartṛhari’s philosophy of language: A study of Bhartṛhari’s Saṃbandha-samuddeśa in the context of the Vākyapadīya with a translation of Helārāja’s commentary Prakīrṇa-Prakāśa. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindtner, C. (1993). Linking up Bhartṛhari and the Bauddhas. In S. Bhate & J. Bronkhorst (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on Bhartṛhari, University of Poona, January 6?8, 1992 (pp. 195?213). Asiatische Studien/Etudes Asiatiques, 47(1).

  • Nakamura, H. (1973). Buddhist influence upon the Vākyapadīya. Journal of the Ganganath Jha Research Institute, 29, 367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberlies, T. (1996). Das zeitliche und ideengeschichtliche Verhältnis der Cāndra-Vṛtti zu anderen V(ai)yākaraṇas (Studien zum Cāndravyākaraṇa III). Festschrift Paul Thieme, Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik, 20, 265–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. C. (1963). Abhinavagupta, an historical and philosophical study. Varanasi: Chowkhamba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan, V. (1976). The dates of Helarāja and Kaiyaṭa. In J. P. Sinha (Ed.), Prof. K.A. Iyer felicitation volume (pp. 105–109). Lucknow: Akhila Bharatiya Sanskrit Parishad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravi Varma, L. A. (1942). The Vākyapadīya (3rd kāṇḍa) with the commentary Prakīrṇaprakāśa of Helārāja son of Bhūtirāja, part II. Trivandrum: Government Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarveswara Sharma, P. (1972). The Kālasamuddeśa of Bhartṛhari’s Vākyapadīya (together with Helārāja’s commentary translated from Sanskrit for the first time). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, V. (1967). On the date of Helarāja. Sri Venkateswara University Oriental Journal, 10, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torella, R. (1992). The Pratyabhijñā and the logical–epistemological school of Buddhism. In T. Goudriaan (Ed.), Ritual and speculation in early tantrism. Studies in honour of André Padoux (pp. 327–345). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torella, R. (2002). The Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā of Utpaladeva with the Author’s Vṛtti. Critical edition and annotated translation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Torella, R. (2008). From an adversary to the main ally: The place of Bhartṛhari in the Kashmirian Śaiva Advaita. In M. Kaul & A. Aklujkar (Eds.), Linguistic traditions of Kashmir. Essays in memory of Pandit Dinanath Yaksha (pp. 508–524). New Delhi: DK Printworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unebe, T. (2000). Jñānaśrībhadra’s interpretation of Bhartṛhari as found in the Laṅkāvatāravṛtti. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 28, 329–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergiani, V. (2009). A quotation from the Mahābhāṣyadīpikā in the Kāśikāvṛtti. In P. Haag & V. Vergiani (Eds.), Studies in the Kāśikāvṛtti. The section on pratyāhāras. Critical edition, translation and other contributions (pp. 161–189). Florence-Delhi: Società Editrice Fiorentina-Manohar [Reprint Anthem Press, London, 2011].

  • Vergiani, V. (forthcoming). The Sādhanasamuddeśa in the Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari, with the Prakīrṇaprakāśa of Helārāja. An annotated translation and study.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Vergiani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vergiani, V. Āgamārthānusāribhiḥ. Helārāja’s Use of Quotations and Other Referential Devices in His Commentary on the Vākyapadīya . J Indian Philos 43, 191–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-014-9237-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-014-9237-4

Keywords

Navigation