Skip to main content
Log in

What is Bhāvanā?

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bhāvanā, “bringing into being,” is one of Mīmāṃsā’s hallmark concepts. It connects text and action in a single structure of meaning. This conjunction was crucially important to Mīmāṃsā’s own interpretive enterprise, and functioned— controversially but influentially—in a broader theory of language. The goal of this paper is to outline bhāvanā’s major contours as it is developed by Kumārilabhaṭṭa and some his followers (Maṇḍanamiśra, Pārthasārathimiśra, Someśvarabhaṭṭa, Khaṇḍadeva, and Āpadeva) and to examine some of the arguments they marshaled in support of it. Bhāvanā is shown to open up, for these Mīmāṃsakas, an understanding of the “deep structure” of Vedic injunctions and the vocabulary for systematically representing it; it accounts for both what people do when they perform an action that is enjoined (ārthī bhāvanā) and what the injunction itself does when it motivates people to performance (śābdī bhāvanā). Bhāvanā has resonances with, and relevance to, contemporary discussions of the nexus of language, understanding, and action, and its value as a carefully-elaborated concept of hermeneutical significance should not be overlooked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Primary Sources

  • In cases of multiple editions, I have cited the first edition listed here, unless noted otherwise.

  • Aṣṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini: Pâṇini’s Grammatik. Ed. Otto Böhtlingk. Abteilung I & II. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2001 [Reprint of 1839–1840 ed.].

  • BhD = Bhāṭṭadīpikā of Khaṇḍadeva: The Bhâtta Dîpikâ of Mahâmahopâdhyâya Sarvatantraswatantra Shrîmat Khandadeva with Prabhavati the commentary of Shri Kavi Mandan Shambhu Bhatta up to the Nivîta Part 1. Edited by Pandit Vedântaviśarada N. S. Ananta Krishṇa Śâstrî and Vâsudeva Laxmaṇa Śâstrî Paṇsîkar. Bombay: Nirnaya-Sagar Press, 1921.

  • BhTR = Bhāṭṭatantrarahasya of Khaṇḍadeva: Bhatta(tantra)rahasyam by Acharya Khandadeva. Edited Critically with Introduction and Notes by Shri A. Subrahmanya Sastri. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University, 1970.

  • BhV = Bhāvanāviveka of Maṇḍana Miśra: [1] See Bhatta (1994) in secondary sources. [2] Bhavanaviveka with Viṣamagranthibhedika. Edited by V. A. Ramaswami Sastri and K. A. Sivaramakrishna Sastri. Annamalai University Sanskrit Series No. 16. Annamalai: Annamalai University, 1950.

  • MNP = Mīmāṃsānyāyaprakāśa of Āpadeva: [1] Mīmāṁsā-Nyāya-Prakāśa by Āpadeva: Edited with an Original Commentary by Mahamahopadhyaya Vasudev Shastri Abhyankar. Second Edition. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1972. Government Oriental Series, Class A, No. 3. [2] Mimamsâ Nyâya Prakâsa by Apadeva, With a commentary called Bhattalankar by Pandit Ananta Deva. Edited by M. M. Sri Lakshmana Sastri. Benares: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office, 1921. Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series No. 268, 269, 279, 280, & 291.

  • MS = Mīmāṃsāsūtra of Jaimini: See TV[1] and TV[2] below.

  • Nirukta of Yāska: The Nighaṇṭu and the Nirukta: The oldest Indian treatise on etymology, philology, and sementics [sic]. Ed. Lakshman Sarup. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1967. [Reprint of 1927 ed.].

  • NRM = Nyāyaratnamālā of Pārthasārathimiśra: Nyâyaratnamâlâ by Pandit Śri Partha Sarthi Misra, edited by Mahâmahopâdhyâya Pandit Gangadhar Shastri. Benares: Chowkhambâ Sanskrit Book Depot, 1900. Chowkhambâ Sanskrit Series.

  • NS = Nyāyasudhā of Someśvara Bhaṭṭa: [1] Nyâyasudhâ, a commentary on Tantravârtika by Paṇḍit Someśwara Bhaṭṭa, edited by Paṇḍit Mukunda Sâstrî. Benares: Chowkhambâ Sanskṛit Book Depôt, 1909. Chowkhambâ Sanskṛit Series Nos. 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 52, 53, 55, 56, 57, 60, 71, 73, 107, 121, & 133. [2] See TV[3] below.

  • ŚB = Śābarabhāṣya of Śabara. See TV[1] and TV[3] below.

  • ŚD = Śāstradīpikā of Pārthasārathimiśra: [1] The Shastradîpika with the Commentary Mayûkhamâlikâ (from second pada of first chapter to the end) by Somanâtha, and with the Commentary Yuktisnehaprapûraṇi with Gûḍhârthavivaraṇa (for the first Tarkpada) by Râmakrishna. Edited by Srî Dharmadattasûri. Bombay: Nirnaya-Sagar Press, 1915. [2] Sastradipika of Parthasarathi Misra, with the commentary Prabha by Tatsat Vydyanatha. 1st Part. Edited by Acharya P. N. Pattabhirama Sastri. New Delhi: Sri Lalabahadur Kendriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha, 1978.

  • ŚV = Ślokavārttika of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa: Ślokavārtikam of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa, with the Commentary Nyāyaratnākara of Śrī Pārthasārathi Miśra, Translated into English from the Commentaries of Sucarita Miśra (Prakāśikā) and Pārthasārathi Miśra (Nyāyaratnākara), by M. M. Ganganath Jha. Volumes I–III. Delhi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Pratisththan, 2009. Chaukhambha Indological Studies 5.

  • TV = Tantravārttika of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa: [1] Śrīmajjaiminipraṇīte mīmāṃsadarśane [6 vols.]. Ed. Vināyaka Gaṇeśa Āpaṭe. Puṇya: Ānandāśramamudraṇālaya, 1929–1934. Ānandāśramasaṃskṛtagranthāvaliḥ 97. [2] The Tantravârtika, a Gloss on Śabara Svâmî’s Commentary on the Mîmâmsâ Sûtras, by Bhaṭṭa Kumârila. Edited by Mahâmahopâdhyâya Paṇḍit Gaṅgâdhara Śâstrî. Benaras: Vidya Vilas Press, 1903. Benaras Sanskṛit Series. Nos. 5, 7, 16, 23, 27, 29, 32, 34, 36, 39, 60, 62, & 72. [3] The Mīmāṃsā Darśana of Maharṣi Jaimini. With Śābarabhāṣya of Śabaramuni with the commentaries of Tantravārtika of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa and its commentary Nyāyasudhā of Someśvara Bhaṭṭa, Bhāṣyavivaraṇa of Govindāmṛtamuni and Bhāvaprakāśikā, Hindi translation by Mahāprabhulāla Gosvāmī. Edited and introduction by Mahāprabhulāla Gosvāmī. Volume II. Varanasi: Tara Printing Works, 1986. Prachayabharti Series 22.

  • VV = Vidhiviveka of Maṇḍana Miśra. Vidhiviveka of Śrī Maṇḍana Miśra, with the Comentary Nyāyakanikā of Vāchaspati Misra. Edited with Detailed Introduction by Mahāprabhulāl Gosvāmī. Varanasi: Tara Publications, 1978. Prāchyabhārtī Series 8.

Secondary Sources

  • Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975. Second edition by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà.

  • Benson, J. (Ed.). (2010). Mīmāṃsānyāyasaṃgraha: A compendium of the principles of Mīmāṃsā. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta, V. P. (1994). Maṇḍanamiśra’s distinction of the activity (Bhāvanāviveka), with introduction, English translation with notes, and Sanskrit text. Delhi: Eastern Book Linkers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, P. (2008). Being and text: Dialogic Fecundation of Western hermeneutics and Hindu Mīmāṃsā in the critical era. In R. D. Sherma & A. Sharma (Eds.), Hermeneutics and hindu thought: Toward a fusion of horizons (pp. 45–79). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clooney, F. X. (1987). Why the Veda has no author: Language as ritual in early Mīmāṃsā and post-modern theology. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 55, 659–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Sa, F. X. (1974). Offenbarung ohne einen Gott. In G. Oberhammer (Ed.), Offenbarung, Geistige Realität des Menschen (pp. 93105). Vienna: Sammlung de Nobili. Publications of the De Nobili Research Library No. 2.

  • D’Sa, F. X. (1980). Śabdaprāmāṇyam in Śabara and Kumārila: Toward a study of the Mīmāṃsā experience of language. Vienna: Sammlung de Nobili, 1980. Publications of the De Nobili Research Library No. 7.

  • Diaconescu, B. (2010). Debating the centre: The theory of principal qualificand (mukhyaviśeṣya) in classical Indian philosophy. Ph.D. Dissertation, Lausanne.

  • Edgerton, F. (1928). Some linguistic notes on the Mīmāṅsā system. Language, 4(3), 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, F. (1986). The Mīmāṅsā Nyāya Prakāśa or Āpadevī: A treatise on the Mīmāṅsā system by Āpadeva. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications. Sri Garib Dass Oriental Series No. 36. [First edition: New Haven, 1929].

  • Frauwallner, E. (1938). Bhāvanā und Vidhiḥ bei Maṇḍanamiśra. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 45, 212–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2004 [1960]). Truth and method. London and New York: Continuum.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2008 [1960]). The nature of things and the language of things. In D. E. Linge (Ed.), Philosophical hermeneutics (pp. 69–81). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2008 [1963]). The phenomenological movement. In D. E. Linge (Ed.), Philosophical hermeneutics (pp. 130–181). Berkeley: Univeristy of California Press.

  • Gnoli, R. (1956). The aesthetic experience according to Abhinavagupta. Rome: Is. M. E. O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbfass, W. (1991). Tradition and reflection: Explorations in Indian thought. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, G. (1942). Pūrva-Mīmāṃsā in its sources. Allahabad: Benaras Hindu University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka, K. (2001). Scripture, men and heaven: Causal structure in Kumārila’s action-theory of bhāvanā. Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 49(2), 1028–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka, K. (2011). Kumārila on truth, omniscience and killing. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, L. (2000). The hierarchical organization of language in Mīmāṃsā interpretive theory. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 28, 429–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, L. (2002). Novelty of form and novelty of substance in seventeenth century Mīmāṃsā. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 30, 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, L. (2007). The teleology of poetics in Medieval Kashmir. Harvard Oriental Series No. 71. Cambridge, MA: Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University.

  • Natarajan, K. (1995). The Vidhi Viveka of Maṇḍana Miśra: Understanding Vedic Injunctions. Monumenta Indica Series No. 5. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.

  • Pollock, S. (2010). What was Bhaṭṭa Nāyaka saying? The hermeneutical transformation of Indian aesthetics. In S. Pollock (Ed.), Epic and argument in Sanskrit literary history: Essays in honor of Robert P. Goldman (pp. 143–184). Delhi: Manohar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, S. (2011). The languages of science in Early Modern India. In S. Pollock (Ed.), Forms of knowledge in Early Modern Asia (pp. 19–48). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran, C. (2001). Influence of Pūrvamīmāṃsā on Alaṃkāraśāstra. The Adyar Library Bulletin, 65, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami Sastri, V. A. (1951). The Mīmāṁsaka conception of Bhāvanā. Vāk, 1, 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami Sastri, V. A. (1952). Bhāvanā, the leading concept of verbal cognition. Bhāratīya Vidyā, 13, 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, J. (1989). Are mantras speech-acts? The Mīmāṃsā point of view. In H. P. Alper (Ed.), Mantras (pp. 144–164). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001 [1945]). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations (3rd ed.) (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • Yoshimizu, K. (1997). Der ‘Organismus’ des Urheberlosen Veda: Eine Studie der Niyoga-Lehre Prabhākaras mit ausgewählten Übersetzungen der Bṛhatī. Vienna: Institut für Indologie der Universität Wien.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Ollett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ollett, A. What is Bhāvanā? . J Indian Philos 41, 221–262 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9181-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9181-8

Keywords

Navigation