Abstract
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912), an architect of the Nyingma (rnying ma) tradition of Tibet in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, articulates two distinct models of the two truths that are respectively reflected in Madhyamaka and Yogācāra Buddhist traditions. The way he positions these two models sheds light on how levels of description are at play in his integration of these traditions. Mipam positions one kind of two-truth model as the product of an ontological analysis while another model can be seen as resulting from a phenomenological reduction. He accommodates both models into his systematic interpretation, and for him, each one has an important role to play in coming to understand the nature of the Buddhist truths of emptiness and Buddha-nature. Since each model reflects a different style of analysis, or a different perspective on truth, his presentation reveals how neither model alone has the last word on the nature of what is and how it is experienced. This paper analyzes the means by which he lays out these two models of the two truths, and explores the implications of their integration in his philosophical works. A primary concern for Mipam, and a factor that guides his attempt to integrate these two approaches to truth, is his aim to both induce authentic experience and true knowledge on the one hand, and represent reality and the experience of it on the other. These competing and complimentary objectives are a central focus around which both styles of critical reflection, and both models of the two truths, revolve.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dennett D. (1991) Consciousness explained. Little Brown and Co, Boston
Duckworth D. (2008) Mipam on Buddha-nature. SUNY Press, Albany
Duckworth, D. (2010a). Mipam’s middle way through Prāsaṣgika and Yogācāra. Journal of Indian Philosophy. (forthcoming).
Duckworth D. (2010b) De/limiting emptiness and the boundaries of the ineffable. Journal of Indian Philosophy 38(1): 97–105
Merleau-Ponty M. (1962) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912). (1987a) Collected works (Dilgo Khyentsé’s expanded redaction of sde dge edition). Kathmandu: Zhechen Monastery.
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912). (1987b). Difficult points of scriptures in general (dbu ma sogs gzhung spyi’i dka’ gnad skor gyi gsung sgros sna tshogs phyogs gcig tu bsdus pa rin po che’i za ma tog). Mipam’s Collected Works (Vol. 22, pp. 427–710).
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912). (1987c) Light of wisdom: Commentary on the Dharmadharmatāvibhāga (chos dang chos nyid rnam ‘byed ‘grel pa ye shes snang ba). Mipam’s Collected Works (Vol. 4 (pa), pp. 609–658).
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912). (1990). Words that delight guru Mañjughoṣa: Commentary on the Madhyamakālaṃkāra (dbu ma rgyan gyi rnam bshad ‘jam byangs bla ma dgyes pa’i zhal lung). Published in dbu ma rgyan rtsa ‘grel. Sichuan: Nationalities Press.
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912). (1993a). Commentary on the wisdom chapter of the Bodhicaryāvatāra (spyod ‘jug sher ‘grel ke ta ka). Sichuan: Nationalities Press.
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912). (1993b). Shedding light on thusness (gzhan gyis brtsad pa’i lan mdor bsdus pa rigs lam rab gsal de nyid snang byed). Published in spyod ‘jug sher ‘grel ke ta ka (pp. 133–463). Sichuan: Nationalities Press.
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912). (1993c). Light of the Sun (brgal lan nyin byed snang ba). Published in spyod ‘jug sher ‘grel ke ta ka (pp. 465–579). Sichuan: Nationalities Press.
Mipam (‘ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912) (1997). Beacon of certainty (nges shes sgron me). Published in nges shes sgron me rtsa ‘grel (pp. 1–54). Sichuan: Nationalities Press.
Siderits M. (2003) Personal identity and Buddhist philosophy. Aldershot and Burlington, Ashgate
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duckworth, D.S. Two Models of the Two Truths: Ontological and Phenomenological Approaches. J Indian Philos 38, 519–527 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9102-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9102-z