Abstract
Educational theorists ranging from Plato, to Freire, to bell hooks, to Peter McLaren have theorized love as an essential factor in education. Whereas, typically, a particular kind of love (erotic love, caring love, etc.) is argued to be especially relevant for educational practice, what we do in this paper is to look at kinds of love that are constitutive for the relationship between teacher and student. Specifically, we outline four types of love that one might find in a classroom. We argue that from the perspective of Italian critical theorist Giorgio Agamben, the first three are problematic as they are not attentive to the potentiality of students to be whatever, and thus sacrifice potentiality of the child as such in the name of what must be or what is. The fourth type of love, on the other hand, embraces the potentiality of the child as a pure means rather than a means to another end. We further argue that there is an educational practice, what we are calling “Philosophy for Infancy” (P4I), that enables us to love our students’ potentiality. In contrast to Philosophy for Children, P4I exposes children to their potentiality rather than orienting specific potentialities towards determined outcomes. As such, P4I has its own, distinctive take on love in the classroom that differentiates it from other forms of love. It is our intention to develop this theory of love.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agamben, G. (1993). The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, G. (2005). The time that remains: A commentary on the letter to the Romans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Biesta, G. J. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Cho, D. (2005). Lessons of love: Psychoanalysis and teacher-student love. Educational Theory, 55(1), 79–96.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Freire, P. (2001). Pedaoggy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield.
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
Jasinski, I. (2016). The passion of (not) teaching: An Agambenian meditation on the value of philosophy for children. Philosophy of Education Archive, 486–493.
Jasinski, I., & Lewis, T. (2015a). Community of infancy: Suspending the sovereignty of the teacher’s voice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Jasinski, I., & Lewis, T. (2015b). The educational community as in-tentional community. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Kohan, W. O. (2012). Childhood, education and philosophy: Notes on deterritorialisation. In N. Vanieleghem & D. Kennedy (Eds.), Philosophy for children in transition: Problems and prospects (pp. 170–189). Walden, MA: Wiley.
Lewis, T. E. (2013). On study: Giorgio Agamben and eduational potentiality. New York: Routledge.
Loreman, T. (2011). Love as pedagogy. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2013). Pedagogical love and good teacherhood. In Many Faces of Love (pp. 93–101). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defense of the school: A public issue. E-book: free to download.
McLauren, P. (2000). Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the pedagogy of revolution. London: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Patience, A. (2008). The art of loving in the classroom: A defence of affective pedagogy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 4.
Uusiautti, S., Määttä, K., & Määttä, M. (2013). Love-based practice in education. International Journal About Parents in Education, 7(2), 134–144.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Substractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: SUNY Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jasinski, I., Lewis, T.E. Another Kind of Love in Education: Whatever Love. Interchange 47, 429–441 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-016-9282-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-016-9282-x