Skip to main content
Log in

Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals

  • Published:
International Applied Mechanics Aims and scope

The paper discusses the evaluation of scientific journals based on the Scopus database, information tools, and criteria. The SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) as the main criterion used by Scopus to evaluate scientific journals is considered. The Scopus and ISI systems are compared using information on the journal Prikladnaya Mekhanika (International Applied Mechanics), a number of world-known journals on mechanics, and some journals on natural sciences issued by the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Some comments and proposals are formulated. This paper may be considered as a follow up on papers published in Prikladnaya Mekhanika (International Applied Mechanics) in 2005–2009

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. N. Guz and J. J. Rushchitsky, “On the problem of evaluation of scientific publications,” Int. Appl. Mech., 45, No. 3, 233–244 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ya. S. Yatskiv (ed.), Ukrainian Science in the Global Information Environment [in Ukrainian], Issue 1 (2008).

  3. R. Adler, J. Ewing, and P. Taylor, Citation Statistics, Report of the Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research from IMU, ICIAM and IMS, 1–26 (2008).

  4. P. D. Batista, M. G. Campiteli, and O. Kinouchi, “Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?” Scientometrics, 68, No. 1, 179–189 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Brooks, “Evidence of complex citer motivations,” J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci., 37, No. 1, 34–36 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Carey, M. G. Cowling, and P. G. Taylor, “Assessing research in the mathematical sciences,” Gazette Austral. Math. Soc., 34, No. 2, 84–89 (2007).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. S. E. Cozzens, “What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model,” Scientometrics, 15, No. 5–6, 437–447 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Garfield, “Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,” Science, 178 (4060), 471–479 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. N. Guz, “On the evolution of the scientific information environment,” Int. Appl. Mech., 42, No. 11, 1203–1222 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. N. Guz and J. J. Rushchitsky, “Presentation of the monographs of the S. P. Timoshenko Institute of Mechanics to the scientific community,” Int. Appl. Mech., 42, No. 3, 247–290 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. N. Guz, J. J. Rushchitsky, and I. S. Chernyshenko, “On a modern philosophy of evaluating scientific publications,” Int. Appl. Mech., 41, No. 10, 1085–1091 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. N. Guz, J. J. Rushchitsky, and I. S. Chernyshenko, “On the six-volume series Uspekhi Mekhaniki (Advances in Mechanics),” Int. Appl. Mech., 43, No. 11, 1185–1194 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Martin and J. Irvin, “Assessing basic research,” Research Policy, 12, 61–90 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Guz.

Additional information

Translated from Prikladnaya Mekhanika, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 4–19, April 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guz, A.N., Rushchitsky, J.J. Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. Int Appl Mech 45, 351–362 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-009-0189-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-009-0189-4

Keywords

Navigation