Abstract
In this paper, an error in the proof of Theorem 4.9 in Gudder’s paper (Int. J. Theor. Phys. 47(1):268–279, 2008) is pointed out and it is proved that if \(\mathcal {E}\approx \{E_{1},E_{2},\ldots,E_{n}\}\in\mathcal {Q}_{pos}({\mathcal{H}})\setminus \mathcal {Q}_{pro}({\mathcal{H}})\) such that E i ∈ℂI∖{0} and E j ∉ℂI for some i,j in {1,2,…,n}, then \(\mathcal {E}\notin \mbox{Ext}[\mathcal {Q}_{pos}({\mathcal{H}})]\) .
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gudder, S.: Mathematical theory of duality quantum computers. Quantum Inf. Process. 6(1), 37–48 (2007)
Gudder, S.: Duality quantum computers and quantum operations. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 47(1), 268–279 (2008)
Long, G.L.: Mathematical theory of the duality computer in the density matrix formalism. Quantum Inf. Process. 6(1), 49–54 (2007)
Long, G.L.: General quantum interference principle and duality computer. Commun. Theor. Phys. 45(5), 825–844 (2006)
Du, H.K., Wang, Y.Q., Xu, J.L.: Applications of the generalized Lüders theorem. J. Math. Phys. 49(1), 013507 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This subject is supported by the NNSF of China (No. 10571113, 10871224).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, ZL., Cao, HX. A Note on the Extreme Points of Positive Quantum Operations. Int J Theor Phys 48, 1669–1671 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-009-9939-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-009-9939-7