Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Power/Faith: Governmentality, Religion, and Post-Secular Societies

  • Published:
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foucault’s concept of governmentality, and its attending modalities of biopower and disciplinary technologies, provides a useful conceptual schema for the analysis of the role of religious and quasi-religious institutions in contemporary society. This is particularly important in the study of those neoliberal democratic states where religious organizations constitute an important presence in the civil society. As religion is thoroughly involved in the reproduction of social structure in most societies, an appraisal of the social and political importance of religious institutions is needed to understand the articulation and exercise of governmentality. This is not just limited to partnerships between state agencies and faith-based organizations in providing for social services, but also in rituals and other religious group activities of these organizations that play a vital role in shaping and molding the social and political subjectivities of the adherents. We argue that synergy between the scholarship on governmentality, and sociology of religion would allow for a more nuanced understanding of the politics and culture of post-secular societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ammerman, N. T. (2005a). Pillars of faith: American congregations and their partners. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman, N. T. (2005b). Connecting mainline protestant churches with public life. In R. Wuthnow & J. H. Evans (Eds.), The quiet hand of god: Faith-based activism and the public role of mainline Protestantism (pp. 129–158). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (1987). On ritual and discipline in medieval Christian monasticism. Economy and Society, 16(2), 159–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (1999). Religion, nation-state, secularism. In P. van der Veer & H. Lehmann (Eds.), Nation and religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia (pp. 178–196). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbato, M., & Kratochwil, F. (2009). Towards a post-secular political order. European Political Science Review, 1, 317–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, W. (1998). Ethics and the narrated life. Journal of Religion, 78(3), 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, J., & Regis, H. (2003). Charitable choices: Religion, race and poverty in the post-welfare era. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1999). The multicultural riddle: Rethinking national, ethnic and religious identities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory; ritual practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, D. (1990). Religion as opposition: a Gramscian analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 96(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, J. (2012): Tony Blair says Christians should speak up and speak out. The Telegraph, July 24, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair/9424859/Tony-Blair-says-Christians-should-speak-up-and-speak-out.html

  • Bowman, J. (2012). Why cosmopolitanism in a post-secular age? Taylor and Habermas on European vs. American exceptionalism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 38(2), 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracke, S. (2008). Conjugating the modern/religious, conceptualizing female religious agency: contours of a `post-secular' conjuncture. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6), 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2008). In spite of the times: the postsecular turn in feminism. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brökling, U., Krasmann, S., & Lemke, T. (Eds.). (2011). Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, G. (1996). Liberal government and techniques of the self. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 19–36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2008). Translation and transformation. The Immanent Frame. Retrieved from http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/09/15/translation-and-transformation/

  • Carrette, J. R. (2000). Foucault and religion: Spiritual corporality and political spirituality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (2006). Religion, European secular identities and European integration. In T. A. Byrnes & P. J. Katzenstein (Eds.), Religion in an expanding Europe (pp. 65–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, M. (2004). Congregations in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: what they do, how they do it, and with whom? Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 660–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan, R. A., Boddie, S. C., Handy, F., Gaynor, Y., & Schneider, R. (2002). The invisible caring hand: American congregations and the provision for welfare. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, B. (1999). The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, S. (2001). The social gospel and the modern American culture. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, H., & Sullivan, L. E. (2006). Political theologies: Public religions in a post-secular world. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1996). Foucault, government and the enfolding of authority. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 209–229). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerath, N. J., III. (2001). Crossing the gods: World religions and worldly politics. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerath, N. J., III, & Yang, Y. (1997). What American culture war? A view from the trenches as opposed to the command posts and the press corps. In R. H. Williams (Ed.), Cultural wars in American politics (pp. 17–38). Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detienne, M. (2006). The gods of politics in early Greek cities. In H. De Vries & L. E. Sullivan (Eds.), Political theologies: Public religions in a post-secular world (pp. 91–101). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. (2009). Can post-secular society tolerate religious differences? Sociology of Religion, 71(2), 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donzelot, J. (1979). The policing of families. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organization, ethics. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elisha, O. (2008). The moral ambitions of grace: the paradox of compassion and accountability in evangelical faith-based activism. Cultural Anthropology, 23(1), 154–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, A. (2009). The separation of religion and politics in a post-secular society. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 35(1–2), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, volume I: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmental rationality (pp. 73–86). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2004). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. Hammondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (1998). Churchgoing and Christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmental rationality (pp. 1–52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P. S., & Altinordu, A. (2008). After secularization. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2010). An awareness of what is missing: Faith and reason in a post-secular age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, D. (2003). Religion and civil society: Rethinking public religion in the contemporary world. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, V., & Weitzman, M. (1993). From belief to commitment: The community service activities and finances of religious congregations in the United States. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2006). From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault's work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power. Political Geography, 26(1), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. (2010). Limits of governmentality: social theory and the international. European Journal of International Relation, 16(2), 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D. I. (1988). Ritual, politics, and power. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, G. (1961). The religious factor: A sociological study of religion's impact on politics, economics, and family life. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichterman, P. (2008). Religion and the construction of civic identity. American Sociological Review, 73(1), 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilla, M. (2007). The politics of God. New York Times Magazine, August 19, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/19/magazine/19Religion-t.html?pagewanted=all

  • Lockhart, W. H. (2005). Building bridges and bonds: generating social capital in secular and faith-based poverty-to-work programs. Sociology of Religion, 66(1), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, T. (1967). The invisible religion. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, R. E. (1991). Social gospel in black and white: American racial reform, 1885–1912. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J. A. (2007). Partial faiths: Postsecular fiction in the age of Pynchon and Morrison. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadesan, M. H. (2008). Governmentality, biopower and everyday life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1966). Religion in a modern pluralistic society. Review of Religious Research, 7, 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piehl, M. (1982). Breaking bread: The Catholic worker and the origins of Catholic radicalism in America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, C., & Young, M. (2010). Religion and post-secular politics. In K. Leicht & J. C. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of politics: State and society in global perspective (pp. 349–365). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, P. F., & Ebaugh, H. R. (2002). Faith-based coalitions, social services, and government funding. Sociology of Religion, 63(1), 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polson, E. C. (2008). Inter-organizational ties that bind: exploring the contributions of agency–congregation relationships. Sociology of Religion, 69(1), 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prothero, S. (2008). Religious literacy: what every American needs to know—and doesn't. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, M. (2010). Post-secular society, transnational religious civilizations and legal pluralism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(3–4), 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 37–64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 321–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 172–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review and Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, R. (2010). Faith, politics, and power. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, M. C. (1978). Equality and Christian anarchism: the political and social ideology of the Catholic workers movement. Review of Politics, 40(2), 196–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sending, O. J., & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Governance to governmentality: analyzing NGOs, states and power. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 651–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, C., & Mellor, P. A. (2007). Cultures of embodied experience: technology, religion and body pedagogics. The Sociological Review, 55(3), 531–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, C. (2000). Faith-based communities and welfare reform: California religious community capacity study. San Francisco: Institute for Non-Profit Organization Management, University of San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D. (2003). Chosen peoples: Sacred sources of national identity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, RIP. Sociology of Religion, 60(3), 249–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streensland, B. (2002). The Hydra and the swords: Social welfare and mainline advocacy, 1964–2000. In R. Wuthnow & J. H. Evans (Eds.), The quiet hand of god: Faith-based activism and the public role of mainline Protestantism (pp. 213–236). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. (1988). Democracy in America. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torpey, J. (2010). A (post-)secular age? Religion and the two exceptionalisms. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 77(1), 269–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, H. R., & Sider, R. J. (2005). Saving souls, serving society: Understanding the faith factor in church based social ministry. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W., & Haahr, J. H. (2005). Governing Europe: Discourses, governmentality and European integration. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R. S. (2008). Presidential address: singing and solidarity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(2), 175–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weithman, P. J. (2002). Religion and the obligations of citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House. (2009). “Obama Announces White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships.” Office of the Press Secretary. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ObamaAnnouncesWhiteHouseOfficeofFaith-basedandNeighborhoodPartnerships

  • Wilson, J., & Janoski, T. (1995). The contribution of religion to volunteer work. Sociology of Religion, 56(2), 137–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, J. P., & Lewis, J. W. (1994a). American congregations: Volume 1, portraits of twelve religious communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wind, J. P., & Lewis, J. W. (1994b). American congregations: Volume 2, new perspectives in the study of congregations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, R. J. (2001). A limited partnership: The politics of religion, welfare, and social service. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. L. (1997). Social capital and political culture: god meets politics in the inner city. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 595–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolever, C., & Bruce, D. (2002). A field guide to U.S. congregations: Who’s going where and why? Louisville: Westminster John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1987). Meaning and moral order: Explorations in cultural analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1989). Restructuring of America’s religion: Society and faith since WW II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1999). Mobilizing civic engagement: The changing impact of religious involvement. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 331–366). Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (2004). Saving America? Faith-based services and the future of civil society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F. (2011). Religion in China: Survival and revival under communist rule. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, J. & Goodstein, L. (2009). White House faith office to expand. New York Times, February 5, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/us/politics/06obama.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saran Ghatak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghatak, S., Abel, A.S. Power/Faith: Governmentality, Religion, and Post-Secular Societies. Int J Polit Cult Soc 26, 217–235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9141-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9141-z

Keywords

Navigation