Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Culture, Sustainability, and Medicine in the Twenty-first Century. Re-grounding the Focus of Medicine Amidst the Current “Global Systemic Shift” and the Forces of the Market: Elements for a Contemporary Social Philosophy of Medicine

  • Published:
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the role and the status of medicine within the “post-modern” culture(s) of the West. As we know, culture is a major factor that influences the perception, the interpretation, and the expectations toward medicine, medical institutions, medical politics, and the persons involved with them. When culture changes, the social construct called “medicine” changes. Today, the Western condition of “post-modernity” finds itself in a process of rapid change due to the “global systemic shift” that is manifesting since a couple of years within all four main systemic logics and discoursive patterns of Western societies: in culture, religion, politics, and economics. In this situation, the article tries to elaborate on crucial questions about how a contemporary social philosophy of medicine can be delineated within the current “global systemic shift” and what some consequences and perspectives could be. It pleas for an integrative philosophy of medicine which has to strive to re-integrate the “(de) constructivist” patterns of “nominalistic” post-modern thought (dedicated primarily to freedom and equality) with the “idealistic” patterns of “realistic” neo-humanism (dedicated primarily to the “essence” of human dignity and the possibility of intersubjective morality). Only the institution of a balanced “subjective-objective” paradigm can ensure medicine its appropriate place, role, and status within our rapidly changing society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedikter, R. (2005). 7-fold Book Series: Postmaterialismus – Die zweite Generation. Vienna: Austrian Ministry of Science and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedikter, R., Giordano J. & Olds, J. (2008). Jahrzehnt des Gehirns, des Verstandes - oder der Vernunft? Die IV. Vorbereitungstagung zu einem “Jahrzehnt des Bewussteins 2010 2020” (Decade of the Mind) DOM-IV in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Bericht dreier Hauptredner. In: Berliner Debatte Initial. Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftlichen Diskurs. Herausgegeben von der Gesellschaft für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Publizistik Berlin. 20. Jahrgang, Heft 3/2009. Berlin, p. 70–99.

  • Benedikter, R., Giordano J., & Fitzgerald, K. (2009). The Future of the (Self-) Image of the Human Being in the Age of Transhumanism, Neurotechnology and Global Transition. In: Futures. The Journal for Policy, Planning and Futures Studies. Special issue “Global Mindset Change” (ed. J. Gidley). Elsevier.

  • Callahan, D. (1990). Modernizing mortality: medical progress and the good society. Hastings Center Report, 20(1), 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D., & Parens, E. (1995). The ends of medicine: shaping new goals. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 72, 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan A. L. (1992). If I were a rich man could I buy a pancreas? Indiana University Press.

  • Clouser, K. D., & Gert, B. (2004). Common morality. In G. Khushf (Ed.), Handbook of bioethics (pp. 121–141). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H. T. (1986a). From philosophy and medicine to philosophy of medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 11, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H. T. (1986b). The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Gert, B., Culver, C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (1997). Bioethics: a return to fundamentals. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, J. (2006a). Moral agency in pain medicine: philosophy, practice and virtue. Pain Physician, 9, 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, J. (2006b). On knowing: the use of knowledge and intellectual virtues in practical pain management. Practical Pain Management, 6(3), 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, J. (2007). Technology, techniques and tekne: on the ethical use of guidelines in the practice of interventional pain medicine. Pain Physician, 10, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, J., & Neale, A. (2007). Daniel Callahan Redux—“can this marriage work” business and the art of medicine. Delaware Medical Journal, 10, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano J., Benedikter R. and Schatman M. (2009). Toward pain care for a global community: From philosophy to economic considerations. In: M. Boswell & J. Giordano (Eds): Pain medicine: Philosophy, ethics and policy. Linton Atlantic Press.

  • Kass, L. (1981). The end of medicine and the pursuit of health. In A. L. Caplan, H. T. Engelhardt Jr. & J. J. McCartney (Eds.), Concepts of health and disease: interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 3–30). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowy, I. (1990). The Polish school of philosophy of medicine: from Tytus Chalubinski (1820–1889) to Ludwik Fleck (1896–1961). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1980). A crisis in moral philosophy: why is the search for the foundations of ethics so frustrating? In H. T. Engelhardt Jr. & D. Callahan (Eds.), Knowing and valuing: the search for common roots (pp. 18–35). New York: Hastings-on-Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maricich, Y., & Giordano, J. (2007). Pain, suffering and the ethics of pain medicine: is a deontic foundation sufficient? American Journal of Pain Management, 17, 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, W. F. (2003). Contending images of the healer in an era of turnstile medicine. In J. K. Walter & E. P. Klein (Eds.), The story of bioethics. From Seminal Works to Contemporary Explorations (pp. 149–162). Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (1983). The healing relationship: the architectonics of clinical medicine. In E. E. Shelp (Ed.), The clinical encounter: the moral fabric of the patient-physician relationship (pp. 153–172). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (1998). What the philosophy of medicine is. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 19, 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (2001a). The internal morality of clinical medicine: a paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26, 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (2001b). Philosophy of medicine: should it be teleologically or socially construed? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 11, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D., & Thomasma, D. C. (1988). For the patient’s good. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, A. I. (1999). Confessions of a medicine man. An essay in popular philosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, H. (1998). Philosophy of medicine and health care—European perspectives. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 1, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, H. (2000). Bodies of knowledge, philosophical anthropology and philosophy of medicine. In H. T. Engelhardt (Ed.), The philosophy of medicine: framing the field (pp. 19–36). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R. M. (1981). A theory of medical ethics. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R. M. (2001). The impossibility of a morality internal to medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26, 621–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2001). Das Reich und die Krankheit der europaeischen Struktur. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26, 621–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization. In W. T. Reich (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics (p. 2616). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildes, K Wm. (2001). The crisis of medicine: philosophy and the social construction of medicine. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 11, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaner, R. (1988). Ethics and the clinical encounter. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland A. J. Benedikter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giordano, J., Hutchison, P.J. & Benedikter, R.A.J. Culture, Sustainability, and Medicine in the Twenty-first Century. Re-grounding the Focus of Medicine Amidst the Current “Global Systemic Shift” and the Forces of the Market: Elements for a Contemporary Social Philosophy of Medicine. Int J Polit Cult Soc 23, 29–41 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9085-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9085-5

Keywords

Navigation