Abstract
Research suggests that teachers of mathematics are frequently reluctant to pose challenging tasks to students. Reasons for this reluctance include fears of negative student reactions, time and resource constraints, and a lack of relevant teacher content knowledge. The current study involved interviewing three early primary-grade (elementary) teachers to explore their perceptions of teaching with challenging tasks, following their observations of 2 units of mathematical work taught by the first author. Contrary to some other studies where classroom teachers were themselves observed teaching with such tasks and asked to reflect on the experience, we found that teacher-participants perceived that students responded positively to the 2 units of work. Specifically, teacher-participants described their students as autonomous, persistent and highly engaged. These positive student reactions were attributed to a variety of factors, including a classroom culture that embraced struggle, high teacher expectations, and consistent classroom routines. Despite these positive reflections, teacher-participants differed in their views of whether challenging tasks are a suitable means of differentiating instruction, with such evaluations apparently linked to how they defined student success.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Note that all teacher and student names have been replaced with pseudonyms.
Indeed, consistent with the position of Sullivan et al. (2016), student outcome data from the current project revealed that participation in the 2 units of work built around challenging tasks resulted in large improvements in both mathematical fluency and problem-solving performance (see Russo & Hopkins, 2018).
See Electronic Supplementary Material 1 for a further example.
See Electronic Supplementary Material 2 for an elaboration of our analytical process.
References
Anthony, G. (1996). Classroom instructional factors affecting mathematics students’ strategic learning behaviours. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the mathematics education research Group of Australasia (pp. 38–48). Melbourne: MERGA.
Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2010). Effective pedagogy in mathematics. Geneva: International Academy of Education.
Applebaum, A., & Leikin, R. (2014). Mathematical challenge in the eyes of the beholder: Mathematics teachers’ views. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education., 14(4), 388–403.
Baroody, A. J., & Hume, J. (1991). Meaningful mathematics instruction: The case of fractions. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 54–68.
Baxter, J. A., & Williams, S. (2010). Social and analytic scaffolding in middle school mathematics: Managing the dilemma of telling. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 7–26.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C.-P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 499–531.
Chan, M. C. E., Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M., Roche, A., Cao, Y. & Peter-Koop, A. (2017). Learning from lessons: Studying the structure and construction of mathematics teacher knowledge in Australia, China and Germany. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0214-6.
Charalambous, C. Y. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the unfolding of tasks in mathematics lessons: Integrating two lines of research. In O. Figueras, J. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education (pp. 281–288). Morelia: PME.
Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D. M., Roche, A., & Wilson, K. (2013). Teachers’ views of the challenging elements of a task. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 154–161). Melbourne: MERGA.
Clarke, D. M., Cheeseman, J., Roche, A., & van der Schans, S. (2014). Teaching strategies for building student persistence on challenging tasks: insights emerging from two approaches to teacher professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 46–70.
Collinson, V., & Cook, T. F. (2001). “I don’t have enough time”-Teachers’ interpretations of time as a key to learning and school change. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(3), 266–281.
Darragh, L. (2013). Sticking with it or doing it quickly: What performances do we encourage in our mathematics learners? In V. Steinle, L. Ball & C. Bardini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the mathematics education research Group of Australasia (pp. 218–225). Melbourne: MERGA.
Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 159–199.
Ellis, M. W., & Berry III, R. Q. (2005). The paradigm shift in mathematics education: explanations and implications of reforming conceptions of teaching and learning. Mathematics Educator, 15(1), 7–17.
Forrester, P. A., & Chinnappan, M. (2010). The predominance of procedural knowledge in fractions. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane & C. Hurst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 185–192). Fremantle: MERGA.
Gandara, P. C. (2000). The dimensions of time and the challenge of school reform. Albany: SUNY Press.
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424.
Leikin, R. (2014). Challenging mathematics with multiple solution tasks and mathematical investigations in geometry. In Y. Li, E. A. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: multiple approaches and practices (pp. 59–80). Dordrecht: Springer.
Leikin, R., Levav-Waynberg, A., Gurevich, I., & Mednikov, L. (2006). Implementation of multiple solution connecting tasks: do students’ attitudes support teachers’ reluctance? Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 28(1), 1–22.
Pogrow, S. (1988). Teaching thinking to at-risk elementary students. Educational Leadership, 45(7), 79–85.
Ridlon, C. L. (2009). Learning mathematics via a problem-centered approach: A two-year study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 188–225.
Roh, K. H. (2003). Problem-based learning in mathematics (ERIC Digest Document ED482725). Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education.
Russo, J. (2016). Teaching mathematics in primary schools with challenging tasks: The Big (not so) Friendly Giant. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(3), 8–15.
Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (2017a). Class challenging tasks: Using cognitive Load theory to inform the design of challenging mathematical tasks. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 22(1), 21–27.
Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (2017b). How does lesson structure shape teacher perceptions of teaching with challenging tasks? Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 30–46.
Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (2018). Teaching primary mathematics with challenging tasks: How should lessons be structured? The Journal of Educational Research, (in press).
Siemon, D., Bleckly, J. & Neal, D. (2012). Working with the Big Ideas in number and the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen & D. Siemon (Eds.), Engaging the Australian Curriculum Mathematics–Perspectives from the field. (pp. 19–45). Online Publication: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.
Stacey, K. (2010). Mathematics teaching and learning to reach beyond the basics. In C. Glascodine & K.-A. Hoad (Eds.), Teaching mathematics? Make it count: What research tells us about effective teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 17–20). Camberwell: ACER.
Star, J. (2015). When not to persevere: Nuances related to perseverance in mathematical problem solving. Chicago: Spencer Foundation.
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.
Sullivan, P., Askew, M., Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D. M., Mornane, A., Roche, A., & Walker, N. (2014). Supporting teachers in structuring mathematics lessons involving challenging tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(2), 1–18.
Sullivan, P., Borcek, C., Walker, N., & Rennie, M. (2016). Exploring a structure for mathematics lessons that initiate learning by activating cognition on challenging tasks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 159–170.
Sullivan, P., Clarke, D. M., Clarke, B., & O'Shea, H. (2010). Exploring the relationship between task, teacher actions, and student learning. PNA, 4(4), 133–142.
Sullivan, P., & Mornane, A. (2013). Exploring teachers’ use of, and students’ reactions to, challenging mathematics tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 1–21.
Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2006). Teacher actions to maximize mathematics learning opportunities in heterogeneous classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 117–143.
Westwood, P. (2011). The problem with problems: Potential difficulties in implementing problem-based learning as the core method in primary school mathematics. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16(1), 5–18.
Wilkie, K. J. (2015). Rise or resist: Exploring senior secondary students’ reactions to challenging mathematics tasks incorporating multiple strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(8), 2061–2083.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russo, J., Hopkins, S. Teachers’ Perceptions of Students When Observing Lessons Involving Challenging Tasks. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 17, 759–779 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9888-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9888-9