Skip to main content
Log in

Linking Science and Statistics: Curriculum Expectations in Three Countries

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the curriculum links between statistics and science that teachers need to understand and apply in order to be effective teachers of the two fields of study. Meaningful statistics does not exist without context and science is the context for this paper. Although curriculum documents differ from country to country, this paper uses extracts from three countries: Australia, New Zealand and the USA. The statistical ideas from the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics, the New Zealand Mathematics and Statistics Curriculum and the US Common Core State Standards for Mathematics are linked to the relevant parts of the Australian Curriculum: Science, the New Zealand Science Curriculum and the US Next Generation Science Standards for States, by States. Teachers of mathematics need to be aware of the potential of science to provide meaningful contexts within which to set statistical investigations. Similarly, teachers of science, who are developing methods for implementing investigations and experiments in their classrooms, need to be aware of the close ties to statistical tools for decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There are various units on statistics at the senior secondary level in draft curricula, including one on statistical inference, but these are not official and not discussed here.

  2. In line with the conventions of the three countries, “year” is used for Australian curricula, “level” for New Zealand curricula and “grade” for US curricula.

References

  • Atweh, B., Calabrese Barton, A., Borba, M. C., Gough, N., Keitel-Kreidt, C., Vistro-Yu, C. & Vithal, R. (Eds.). (2007). Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science (2011). Primary connections. Canberra, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science (2012). Earthquake explorers. Year 6. Earth and space sciences. Canberra, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2013a). Australian curriculum, version 5.0, 20 May 2013. Sydney, Australia: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2013b). Australian curriculum: English, version 5.0, 20 May 2013. Sydney, Australia: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2013c). Australian curriculum: Mathematics, version 5.0, 20 May 2013. Sydney, Australia: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2013d). Australian curriculum: Science, version 5.0, 20 May 2013. Sydney, Australia: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2013e). General capabilities in the Australian curriculum, January, 2013. Sydney, Australia: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council (1994a). A national statement on science for Australian schools. Melbourne, Australia: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council (1994b). Mathematics—A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council (1994c). Science—A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. & Howson, G. (2013). Toward an international mathematics curriculum. In M. A. (Ken) Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 949–974). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K. & Taylor, N. (2012). An international perspective on science curriculum development and implementation. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. J. Campbell (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 771–782). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010a). Common core state standards for English language art and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: NGA Center & CCSSO. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2014.

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010b). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: NGA Center & CCSSO. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2012.

  • Eichler, A. (2010, July). The transformation process from written curricula to students’ learning. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based societyProceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics . Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots8/ICOTS8_8E3_EICHLER.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2015.

  • Franklin, C., Bargagliotti, A., Case, C., Kader, G., Scheaffer, R. & Spangler, D. (2015). Statistics education of teachers. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/education/SET/SET.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2015.

  • Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M. & Scheaffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A preK-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.

  • Heck, D., Chval, K., Weiss, I. & Ziebarth, S. W. (2012). Approaches to studying the enacted mathematics curriculum. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, P. (1980). Teaching statistics 11–16. Slough, United Kingdom: Schools Council and Foulsham Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M., Pearson, G. & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfensperger, P., Jacobbe, T., Lurie, D. & Moreno, J. (2012). Bridging the gap between common core state standards and teaching statistics. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K. & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B. & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council of Learned Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1992). Mathematics in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Author. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum. Accessed 20 Nov 2008.

  • Ministry of Education (2014). Science online: New resources to support science education. Retrieved from http://scienceonline.tki.org.nz/New-resources-to-support-science-education. Accessed 15 Sept 2014.

  • Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. S. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, P. (1930). Education: Its data and first principles. London, England: E. Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Chief Scientist (2013). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the national interest: A strategic approach. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1975). Teaching of statistics at the secondary level: An interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 6, 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J. & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 319–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Common Core Standards Writing Team (2011). Progressions documents for the common core math standards. Tucson, AZ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschut, A. & Bakker, A. (2010, July). Towards evaluation criteria for coherence of a data-based statistics curriculum. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based societyProceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Teaching of Statistics. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots8/ICOTS8_3E1_VERSCHUT.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2015.

  • Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M. (2009). The development of statistical understanding at the elementary school level. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(1), 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London, England: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R.T. & Gunstone, R.F. (2014). Probing understanding. New York: Routledge.

  • Wild, C. & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this paper, related only to Australia and the USA and without discussion, was presented at the 9th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Flagstaff, AZ, July 2014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane M. Watson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watson, J.M. Linking Science and Statistics: Curriculum Expectations in Three Countries. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 15, 1057–1073 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9673-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9673-y

Keywords

Navigation