Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

‘Boys Press All the Buttons and Hope It Will Help’: Upper Secondary School Teachers’ Gendered Conceptions About Students’ Mathematical Reasoning

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous results show that Swedish upper secondary school teachers attribute gender to cases describing different types of mathematical reasoning. The purpose of this study was to investigate how these teachers gender stereotype aspects of students’ mathematical reasoning by studying the symbols that were attributed to boys and girls, respectively, in a written questionnaire. The results from the content analysis showed that girls were attributed gender symbols including insecurity, use of standard methods and imitative reasoning, and boys were assigned symbols such as multiple strategies especially on the calculator, guessing and chance-taking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, A. C. (2004). Speaking of gender: teachers’ metaphorical constructs of male and female students. Gender and Education, 16(3), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shakhar, G. & Sinai, Y. (1991). Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: the role of differential guessing tendencies. Journal for Educational Measurement, 28(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., & Sumpter, L. (2007). Upper secondary students’ task reasoning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(1), 1--12.

  • Bjerrum Nielsen, H. (2003). One of the boys? Doing gender in scouting. Génève: World Organization of the Scout Movement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesen, J. (2006). Assessing mathematical creativity (Doctoral dissertation). Umeå University, Sweden

  • Brandell, G. & Staberg, E.-M. (2008). Mathematics: a female, male or gender neutral domain? A study of attitudes among students at secondary level. Gender and Education, 20(5), 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandell, G., Leder, G. & Nyström, P. (2007). Gender and mathematics: recent development from a Swedish perspective. ZDM, 39(3), 235–250.

  • Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A. & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16(7), 572–578.

  • Carr, M. & Davis, H. (2001). Gender differences in strategy use: a function of skill and preference. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 330–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M. & Jessup, D. L. (1997). Gender differences in first grade mathematics strategy use: social and metacognitive influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2009). Om genus [Gender in world perspective]. Riga, Latvia: Livonia print.

  • Damarin, S. & Erchick, D. B. (2010). Toward clarifying the meanings of gender in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 310–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L. & Levi, L. W. (1998). A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children’s mathematical thinking. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 6–11.

  • Gallagher, A. M. & DeLisi, R. (1994). Gender differences in scholastic aptitude test—mathematical problem solving among high-ability students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 204–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannerud, E. (2009). Pedagogers syn på några aspekter av genus och jämställdhet i arbetet [Pedagogues’ views on some aspects of gender and equality in work]. In I. Wernersson (Ed.), Genus i förskola och skola. Förändringar i policy, perspektiv och praktik (pp. 85–104). Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

  • Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Jussim, L. & Eccles, J. S. (1992). Teacher expectations II: construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 947–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahlin, L. (2008). Sociala kategoriseringar i samspel. Hur kön, etnicitet och generation konstitueras i ungdomars samtal [Social categorisation in interplay. Gender, ethnicity and generation constituted in adolescents’ conversation] (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis.

  • Klein, P. S., Adi-Japha, E. & Hakak-Benizri, S. (2010). Mathematical thinking of kindergarten boys and girls: similar achievement, different contributing process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 233–246.

  • Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M. & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265.

  • Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhrn, E. (1990). Könsmönster i klassrumsinteraktion. En observations-och intervjustudie av högstadieelevers lärarkontakter. [Gender patterns in classroom interactions. Observations and interviews concerning students’ interactions with teachers in grade nine of the comprehensive school] (Unpublished PhD thesis), Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg, Sweden.

  • Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). New York: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatek-Jimenez, K. (2015). On the persistence and attrition of women in mathematics. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 5(1), 3–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R. (2000). Research design. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 17–39). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sumpter, L. (2012). Upper secondary school students’ gendered conceptions about affect in mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 27–47.

  • Sumpter, L. (2013). Themes and interplay of beliefs in mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1115--1135.

  • Sumpter, L., (2015). Investigating upper secondary school teachers’ conceptions: Is mathematical reasoning considered gendered? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9634-5

  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

  • Tiedemann, J. (2000a). Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann, J. (2000b). Parents’ gender stereotypes and teachers’ beliefs as predictors of children’s concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 144–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out. London, England: Falmer press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden

    Lovisa Sumpter

Authors
  1. Lovisa Sumpter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lovisa Sumpter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sumpter, L. ‘Boys Press All the Buttons and Hope It Will Help’: Upper Secondary School Teachers’ Gendered Conceptions About Students’ Mathematical Reasoning. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 1535–1552 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9660-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9660-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation