Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

DIAGNOSING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF ENERGY AND ITS RELATED CONCEPTS IN BIOLOGICAL CONTEXT

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study diagnosed the understanding about energy and biological-context energy concepts held by 90 first-year South African university biology students. In particular, students’ explanations of energy in a biological context, how energy is involved in different biological situations and whether energy is present and what types of energy are involved in diagrams depicting biological phenomena were investigated. The pencil-and-paper diagnostic test, specifically designed for this study, was used to elicit students’ understanding using test items involving biological phenomena. The results showed that many students had problems in understanding energy and energy-related concepts in the following areas: First, the majority of the students provided definitions of energy rather than the explanations they were asked to provide, and the definition could have been rote-learned. Second, although nearly all students knew the energy conservation principle (energy cannot be created or destroyed), many of them were unable to apply this concept to biological contexts. Third, many students erroneously claimed that the energy for metabolism and life processes is made available during photosynthesis in plants, during digestion in animals or that this energy comes directly from the sun. Fourth, about two thirds of the students erroneously indicated that there is no energy involved/present in inanimate objects such as a statue. The implications for the teaching and learning of energy and its related concepts and recommendations for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, M. (1985). Plants and energy: A working paper of the Science Educational Research Unit. Working paper No. 225. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, J., Gorodetsky, M. & Chipman, D. (1997). Understanding of energy in biology, and vitalistic conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becu-Robinault, K. & Tiberghien, A. (1998). Integrating experiments into the teaching of energy. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. (1987). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education and social sciences (1st ed.). Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J. & Ogborn, J. (1985). Children’s choices of uses of energy. European Journal of Science Education, 72(2), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes, E. & Stanisstreet, M. (1991). Misconceptions in first-year undergraduate science students about energy sources for living organisms. Journal of Biological Education, 25(3), 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (2000). Energy: Between physics and metaphysics. Science &Education, 9(5), 459–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A. & Sethna, G. H. (1991). Manual for procedures for conducting content analysis of science textbooks. Available from the University of Houston, Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Houston, Texas, USA.

  • Clerk, D. & Rutherford, M. (2000). Language as a confounding variable in the diagnosis of misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 703–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. A. (1960). A coefficient agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 20, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (1984). Learning the energy concept in school—empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19(2), 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, Y. & Stavy, R. (1988). Students’ understanding of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 50(4), 208–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston, T. (1999). Students’ constructs about energy and constructivist learning. Research in Science Education, 29(4), 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayford, C. G. (1986). Some aspects of the problems of teaching about energy. European Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 443–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J. & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldring, H. & Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts. Physics Education, 29(1), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, B., Gunel, M. & Ulu, C. (2009). Sequencing embedded multimodal representations in a writing to learn approach to the teaching of electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, F. & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple-choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelen, A. V. & Zou, X. (2001). Multiple representations of work-energy processes. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeevaratnam, E. G., Msiza, A. K., Case, J. M. & Fraser, D. M. (2001). Understanding of energy by first year students. In Proceedings of the Third Working Conference on Engineering Education for the 21st Century (pp. 117–122). Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.

  • Kemp, H. (1984). The concept of energy without heat or work. Physics Education, 19(5), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou, S. & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics—an interpretative study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kose, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, C., Palacio, D. & Summers, M. (1992). Surveys of English primary teachers’ conceptions of force, energy and materials. Science Education, 76(4), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linjse, P. (1990). Energy between the life-world of pupils and the world of physics. Journal of Science Education, 74(1), 571–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Ebenezer, J. & Fraser, D. M. (2002). Structural characteristics of university engineering students’ conceptions of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. F. (2003). Students’ use of formal and informal knowledge about energy and the human body. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Australia: Curtin University of Technology.

  • Nicholls, G. & Ogborn, J. (1993). Dimensions of children’s conceptions of energy. International Journal of Science Education, 15(1), 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prain, V., Tytler, R. & Peterson, S. (2009). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 787–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H. & Johnson, G. B. (1999). Biology (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J. & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children’s choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saglam-Arslan, A. (2010). Cross-grade comparison of students’ understanding of energy concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saglam-Arslan, A. & Kurnaz, M. A. (2009). Prospective physics teachers’ level of understanding energy, power and force concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), Article 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 919–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. & Cramer, F. (1992). Matric biology pupils’ ideas about respiration: Implications for science teachers. South African Journal of Science, 88(11/12), 543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. & Mokuku, T. (1994). How valid is face validity? In Proceedings of the Southern African Association for Research and Development in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 479–489). Durban, South Africa: University of Durban-Westville.

  • Solomon, J. (1982). How children learn about energy or does the first law come first? School Science Review, 63(224), 415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1985). Teaching the conservation of energy. Physics Education, 20(4), 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1992). Getting to know about energy in school and society. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, E. P., Berg, L. R., Martin, D. W. & Villee, C. (1993). Biology (3rd ed.). New York: Saunders College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. V. & Silk, A. M. J. (1990). An introduction to the psychology of children’s drawings. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheat Sheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumper, R. (1990). Energy and a constructivist way of teaching. Physics Education, 25(4), 208–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper, R. (1997). A survey of conceptions of energy of Israeli pre-service high school biology teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper, R. & Gorsky, P. (1993). Learning about energy: The influence of alternative frameworks, cognitive levels, and closed-mindedness. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 637–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. (1986). At what stage should energy be taught? Physics Education, 21(3), 154–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18(5), 213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Curriculum & Instruction, Science Education, Southern Illinois University, 625 Wham Drive, MC 4610, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA

    Vivien Mweene Chabalengula & Frackson Mumba

  2. Science Education, Witwatersrand University, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Martie Sanders

Authors
  1. Vivien Mweene Chabalengula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martie Sanders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frackson Mumba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivien Mweene Chabalengula.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chabalengula, V.M., Sanders, M. & Mumba, F. DIAGNOSING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF ENERGY AND ITS RELATED CONCEPTS IN BIOLOGICAL CONTEXT. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 10, 241–266 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9291-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9291-2

KEY WORDS

Search

Navigation