Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

EXPLORING VISUOSPATIAL THINKING IN LEARNING ABOUT MINERALOGY: SPATIAL ORIENTATION ABILITY AND SPATIAL VISUALIZATION ABILITY

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This mixed-method research attempted to clarify the role of visuospatial abilities in learning about mineralogy. Various sources of data—including quantitative pre- and postmeasures of spatial visualization and spatial orientation tests and achievement scores on six measures and qualitative unstructured observations, interviews, and field trip notes—were utilized to document the abilities and learning of 27 university students. Results indicated that (a) some students had initial difficulty with certain visual concepts, such as 3D crystal models, symmetry elements, mirror symmetry, rotation, inversion, and combination of symmetry elements while they were learning about mineralogy; (b) learning about mineralogy and spatial ability are two interrelated components; while the mineralogy course improved students’ spatial ability, their existing spatial abilities had a strong influence on facilitating mineralogy learning; and (c) spatial visualization skill is a better predictor of mineralogy achievement than spatial orientation skill. While the discussions highlighted the role of visuospatial thinking in learning about mineralogy, it is argued that researchers and curriculum developers should focus on the productive role of visuospatial thinking in learning about science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barke, H. D., & Engida, T. (2001). Structural chemistry and spatial ability in different cultures. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2, 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1988). Theories, principles and laws. Education in Chemistry, 25, 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S., LaRussa, M. A., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 727–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christman, R. A. (1965). A relief model for teaching topographic counters. Journal of Geological Education, 13(4), 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S., & Gotch, A. (1998). Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 206–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90, 1073–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copolo, C. F., & Hounshell, P. B. (1995). Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor referenced cognitive tests. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furio, C., Calatayud, M. L., Barcenas, S. L., & Padilla, O. M. (2000). Functional fixedness and functional reduction as common sense reasoning in chemical equilibrium and in geometry and polarity of molecules. Science Education, 84, 545–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D. (1998). The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 233–248). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students’ alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2003). On the contribution of diagrams to learning and to assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA

  • Habraken, C. L. (1996). Perceptions of chemistry: Why is the common perception of chemistry, the most visual of sciences, so distorted? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 5, 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 701–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kali, Y., & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keig, P. F., & Rubba, P. A. (1993). Translation of representation of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 883–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D. (1996). Illustrating chemistry. In B. Baigrie (Ed.), Picturing knowledge: Historical and philosophical problems concerning the use of art in science (pp. 135–163). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students’ understanding of chemical concepts. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science: International perspective on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 117–145). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T., & Wagner, T. (2009). Mixed-methodology research in science education: Opportunities and challenges in exploring and enhancing thinking dispositions. In M. C. Shelley II, L. D. Yore & B. Hand (Eds.), Quality research in literacy and science education: International perspectives and gold standards (pp. 213–243). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, T. R. (1985). Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual–spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83, 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlberger, W. L., & Boyer, R. E. (1961). Space relations test as a measure of visualization ability. Journal of Geological Education, 9, 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piburn, M. D. (1980). Spatial reasoning as a correlate of formal thought and science achievement for New Zealand students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 443–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piburn, M. D. (1992). Meta-analytic and multivariate procedures for the study of attitude and achievement in science. Paper presented at the International Council of Association for Science Education, Dortmund, Germany

  • Piburn, M. D., Reynolds, S. J., McAuliffe, C., Leedy, D. E., Birk, J. P., & Johnson, J. K. (2005). The role of visualization in learning from computer-based images. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 513–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. J., Piburn, M. D., Leedy, D. E., McAuliffe, C., Birk, J. P., & Johnson, J. K. (2006). The hidden earth: Interactive, computer-based modules for geoscience learning. In C. Manduca & D. Mogk (Eds.), Earth and mind: How geologists think and learn about the Earth (pp. 157–170). Boulder: Geological Society of America.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, J. W., & Lutz, K. A. (1976). Effect of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 305–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, G. M., & Eniaiyeju, P. A. (1986). The understanding of pictorial depth cues and the ability to visualize the rotation of three-dimensional structures in diagrams. Research in Science and Technological Education, 4, 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubbar, K. E. (1990). Learning the visualization of rotations in diagrams of three dimensional structures. Research in Science and Technological Education, 8, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. Y., & Morton, M. E. (1983). Research in college science teaching: Spatial visualization training improves performance in organic chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 13, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staver, J. R., & Jacks, T. (1988). The influence of cognitive reasoning level, cognitive restructuring ability, disembedding ability, working memory capacity, and prior knowledge on students’ performance on balancing equations by inspection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 763–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieff, M., Stillings, N., Arasasingham, R., Taagepera, M., & Wamser, C. (2004). Characterizing chemistry problem solving with convergent approaches from chemistry, education, and psychology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

  • Talley, L. H. (1973). The use of three-dimensional visualization as a moderator in the higher cognitive learning of concepts in college level chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10, 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., & Chittleborough, G. (2001). Chemistry: A matter of understanding representations. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Subject-specific instructional methods and activities (Vol. 8, pp. 239–267). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckey, H., Selvaratnam, M., & Bradley, J. (1991). Identification and rectification of student difficulties concerning three-dimensional structures, rotation, and reflection. Journal of Chemical Education, 68, 460–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 821–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, Department of Science Education, Nigde University, Derbent Campus, Nigde, 51100, Turkey

    Gokhan Ozdemir

Authors
  1. Gokhan Ozdemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gokhan Ozdemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozdemir, G. EXPLORING VISUOSPATIAL THINKING IN LEARNING ABOUT MINERALOGY: SPATIAL ORIENTATION ABILITY AND SPATIAL VISUALIZATION ABILITY. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 8, 737–759 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9183-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9183-x

Key words

Search

Navigation