Abstract
Science teachers generally find inquiry-based laboratory work very difficult to manage. This research project aimed at facilitating chemistry teachers to implement inquiry-based laboratory work in Hong Kong secondary schools. The major concerns of seven chemistry teachers were identified. They were most concerned about the lack of class time, shortage of effective instructional materials, and the need to teach large classes. To allay teacher concerns, teaching strategies were developed to aid teachers. The strategies include the use of guided inquiry rather than open inquiry, development of ten examples of authentic inquiry, and inclusion of student oral presentations as a key component of the inquiry process. Trials done in schools indicated that these strategies are useful.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D. & Tuan, H.L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419.
Anderson, R.D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
Backus, L. (2005). A year without procedures. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 54–58.
Booth, G. (2001). Is inquiry the answer? The Science Teacher, 68(7), 57–59.
Brown, P.L., Abell, S.K., Demir, A. & Schmidt, F.J. (2006). College science teachers’ views of classroom inquiry. Science Education, 90, 784–802.
Cheung, D. (2006a). Chemistry teachers’ concerns about implementing inquiry-based experiments. Hong Kong Science Teachers’ Journal, 23(2), 1–7 (in Chinese).
Cheung, D. (2006b). Inquiry-based laboratory work in chemistry: Teacher’s guide. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong. available at http://www3.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/chemistry/.
Cheung, D. & Yip, D.Y. (2004). How science teachers’ concerns about school-based assessment of practical work vary with time: The Hong Kong experience. Research in Science & Technological Education, 22, 153–169.
Costenson, K. & Lawson, A.E. (1986). Why isn’t inquiry used in more classrooms? American Biology Teacher, 48(3), 150–158.
Deters, K. (2004). Inquiry in the chemistry classroom. The Science Teacher, 71(10), 42–45.
Deters, K.M. (2005). Student opinions regarding inquiry-based labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 1178–1180.
Education and Manpower Bureau (2003). Inquiry-based chemistry experiments. Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.
Friedrichsen, P.M., Munford, D. & Orgill, M. (2006). Brokering at the boundary: A prospective science teacher engages students in inquiry. Science Education, 90, 522–543.
Furtak, E.M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 453–467.
Gallet, C. (1998). Problem-solving teaching in the chemistry laboratory: Leaving the cooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 72–77.
Gibson, H.L. & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86, 693–705.
Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Hackling, M.W., Goodrum, D. & Rennie, L.J. (2001). The state of science in Australian secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 47(4), 6–17.
Hall, G.E. & Hord, S.M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hibbard, K.M. (2000). Performance-based learning and assessment in middle school science. Larchmont, New York: Eye On Education.
Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 93–108). London: Routledge.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V.N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.
Hofstein, A., Shore, R. & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47–62.
Jones, M.E., Gott, R. & Jarman, R. (2000). Investigations as part of the key stage 4 science curriculum in Northern Ireland. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(1), 23–37.
Lawson, A.E. (2000). Managing the inquiry classroom: Problems & solutions. American Biology Teacher, 62(9), 641–648.
Lazarowitz, R. & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching (pp. 94–128). New York: Macmillan.
Lechtanski, V.L. (2000). Inquiry-based experiments in chemistry. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Leonard, W.H. (1980). Using the extended discretion approach in biology laboratory investigations. American Biology Teacher, 42(6), 338–341.
Lord, T. & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342–345.
Lubben, R. & Ramsden, J.B. (1998). Assessing pre-university students through extended individual investigations: Teachers’ and examiners’ views. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 833–848.
Lunetta, V.N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 249–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Lunsford, E. & Melear, C.T. (2004). Using scoring rubrics to evaluate inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(1), 34–38.
McNally, J.G. (2000). Teaching investigative science: preliminary theorizing from the shared reflections of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 159–176.
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I. & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP): Reference manual. Tempe, Arizona: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
Reeve, S., Hammond, J.W. & Bradshaw, W.S. (2004). Inquiry in the large-enrollment science classroom: Simulating a research investigation. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34(1), 44–48.
Roehrig, G.H. & Luft, J.A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 3–24.
Staer, H., Goodrum, D. & Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28, 219–228.
Tuan, H.L, Chin, C.C., Tsai, C.C. & Cheng, S.F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 541–566.
Volkmann, M.J. & Abell, S.K. (2003). Rethinking laboratories: Tools for converting cookbook labs into inquiry. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 38–41.
Welch, W., Klopfer, L., Aikenhead, G. & Robinson, J. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65, 33–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheung, D. Facilitating Chemistry Teachers to Implement Inquiry-based Laboratory Work. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 6, 107–130 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9102-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9102-y