Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating First-Year Chemistry Learning Difficulties in the South Pacific: A Case Study from Fiji

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The learning difficulties for new entrant chemistry students from a multi-national, regional, tertiary education institution in the South Pacific were investigated using a purpose-designed diagnostic instrument. The instrument contained 25 items distributed across three themes: scientific reasoning, numeracy and scientific language literacy. The research findings suggest that the main learning difficulty facing these students is in numeracy with students able to interpret numerical data presented in graphical form and to complete rudimentary numerical calculations, but unable to use numerical data or perform calculations involving ratios. Targeted remedial tutoring, based on the results of this diagnostic test instrument, rather than content-driven extra tutorials, are suggested for remediation of learning difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsina, C. (2002). Too much is not enough: Teaching maths through useful applications with local and global perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(2), 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A.C. (1995). Teaching chemical equilibrium and thermodynamics in undergraduate general chemistry classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(10), 879–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, V. (1990). The development of the concept of evaporation. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, V. & Travis, A.S. (1991). Children's views concerning phase change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, G.M. (1994). General chemistry and the basis for change. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(10), 874–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, R. & Hofstein, A. (1996). Strategies for reediting learning difficulties in chemistry. In D.F. Treagust, R. Duit & B.J. Fraser (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning (pp. 109–119). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, D.F. & White, A.L. (1998). Integrated science and mathematics education: Evolution and implications of a theoretical model. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 499–512). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J. (1995). Piaget and after: The case of learning science. Studies in Science Education, 25, 139–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, G.M. (1991). I have found you an argument: The conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(5), 385–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boo, H.K. (1998). Students' understandings of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BouJaoude, S.B. (1992). The relationship between students' learning strategies and the change in their understanding during a high school chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 687–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brahier, D.J. (2001). Understanding matehmatcis and basic skills. Matehmatics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(1), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buntting, C., Coll, R.K. & Campbell, A. (in press). Student views of concept mapping use in introductory tertiary biology classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

  • Carlson, C. (2000). Scientific literacy for all. Science Teacher, 67(3), 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, P., Driver, R., Holding, B., Phillips, I., Twigger, D. & Watts, M. (1990). Research on students' conceptions in science: A bibliography. Children's learning in science project. Leeds, England: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. & Pyvis, D. (2000). Literacy and numeracy needs and priorities: A case study of regional TAFE courses in Western Australia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Rural Communities & Identities in the Global Millennium. Nanaimo, BC, Canada.

  • Cobern, W.W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R.K. & Treagust, D.F. (2002). Learners' use of analogy and alterative conceptions for chemical bonding: A cross-age study. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 48(1), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R.K., & Treagust, D.F. (2003). Learner's mental models of metallic bonding: A cross-age study. Science Education, 87, 685–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R.K., Taylor, N. & Fisher, D.L. (2002). An application of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction and College and University Classroom Environment Inventory in a multicultural tertiary context. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgety, J., Coll, R.K. & Jones, A. (2003). The development of the Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 649–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1981). Pupil's alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1989a). Changing conceptions. In P. Adley (Ed.), Adolescent development and school science (pp. 79–99). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1989b). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europa World Yearbook. (1994). London: Europa Publications.

  • Fensham, P.J. (1992). Science education at first degree level. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, B.L., Cavallo, A.M.L. & Marek, E.A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (1997). The role of language in primary science. Primary Science Review, 48, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.K. & Boulter, C.J. (1998). Learning science through models and modelling. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 53–66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.K. & Watts, D.M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R.G., Wandersee, J.H. & St. Julien, J. (1993). Cautionary notes on the appeal of the new ‘ism’ (constructivism) in science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 71–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D.J., Anderson, T.R. & Crossley, L.G. (2001). A four-level framework for identifying and classifying student conceptual and reasoning difficulties. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E. & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, P.B. (1992). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A.H. & Selepeng, D. (2001). A language problem revisited. Chemical Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(1), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, L.S. (1996). Critical thinking in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(3), 218–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R.C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, P.M. (1996). Undergraduate science education: A review of research. Studies in Science Education, 28, 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A.E. (1992). Using reasoning ability as the basis for assigning laboratory partners in nonmajors biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 729–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M.C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 265–294). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, M. (2005). The development, implementation, and evaluation of a problem solving heuristic. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, B. (2003). Public policy in mathematics education: A hidden agenda. Education Canada, 43(2), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, K.E. (1998). Scientific inquiry within reach of young children. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 81–96). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K.W. & Davison, D.M. (2001). A cultural and linguistic approach to teaching science and mathematics to Native American students. Science Educator, 10(1), 38-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugler, F. & Landbeck, R. (2000). Learning, memorisation and understanding among distance learners in the South Pacific. Learning and Instruction, 10(2), 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, D. & Kirkpatrick, A. (2000). How much do they understand? Lectures, students and comprehension. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muralidhar, S. (1989). An exploratory study of a science curriculum in action: Basic Science in Fiji. Unpublished PhD thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J. & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11(3), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. & Cosgrove, M.R. (1983). Children's conceptions of the of changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (Eds.). (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulston, C.B. (1988). Bilingualism and bilingual education. In C.B. Paulston (Ed.), International handbook of bilingualism and bilingual education (pp. 1–15). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Student's alternative frameworks and science education (3rd edn.). Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (1997). Bibliography: Student's alternative frameworks and science education (4th edn.). Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Student's alternative frameworks and science education (5th edn.). Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkethly, A. & Prosser, M. (2000). The first year experience project: A model for university-wide change. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(2), 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, K.M. (1999). Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prophet, B. & Twose, P. (1999). Pupils' understanding of some non-technical words in science. School Science Review, 81(295), 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). Using vee and concept maps in collaborative settings: Elementary education majors construct leaning in physical science courses. School Science and Mathematics, 93(5), 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sade, D. & Coll, R.K. (2003). Technology and technology education: Views of some Solomon Island primary teachers and curriculum development officers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P.H., Asoko, H.M. & Driver, R.H. (1992). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an International Workshop. University of Bremen. Kiel: Institute for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1995). Higher level understanding of the nature of science. School Science Review, 76(276), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, D., Dennick, R. (2002). Exploring culture, language and the perception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K.S. & Coll, R.K. (2002). Bonding. In J.K., Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D.F. Treagust & J.H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 213–234). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavola, H. (1992). Race is not the only issue in education in Fiji. Directions: Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N.T. (1991). The Fiji junior certificate basic science examination: Its implications for the teaching of science in Fiji. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 14(2), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. (1993). Teaching science at the University of the South Pacific: Its special problems. Journal of Indian Education, 18(5), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N.T. & Coll, R.K. (1999). The science learning environment: Some views from Fiji pre-service primary school teachers. Pacific-Asian Education, 11(2), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. & Lucas, K. (1997). The trial of an innovative science program for pre-service primary teachers in Fiji. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(3), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. & Roth, M.W. (1996). Staging Aristotle and natural observation against Galileo and (stacked) scientific experiment or physics lectures as rhetorical events. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(2), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism: A paradigm for the practice of science education. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, A. (2002). Literacy approaches in the numeracy classroom. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 1(2), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D.F. (1995). Diagnostic assessment of students' science knowledge. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 327–346). Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D.F., Chittleborough, G. & Mamiala, T.L. (2002). Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim, W.M.K. (2001). The research methods knowledge base (2nd edn.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viiri, J. (1996). Teaching the force concept: A constructivist teaching experiment in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1989). Analogical reasoning in knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 413–437). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Translated by A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Ward, R.E. & Wandersee, J.H. (2002). Struggling to understand abstract science topics: A roundhouse diagram-based study. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 575–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, G.H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, V.L., Ackerman, C. & Malave, C. (2000). Cross-time attitudes, concept formation and achievement in college freshman physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1112–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1996). Pacific island economies: Building a resilient economic base for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack, V. (1999). Everyday and mathematical language in children's argumentation about proof. Educational Review, 51(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A. & Tamir, P. (1991). Assessing students' difficulties in causal reasoning biology—a diagnostic instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 25(4), 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoller, U. (1990). Students' misunderstandings and misconceptions in college freshman chemistry (general and organic). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1053–1065.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Science and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hillcrest Road, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Richard Kevin Coll, Sadaquat Ali, John Bonato & David Rohindra

Authors
  1. Richard Kevin Coll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sadaquat Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Bonato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Rohindra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Kevin Coll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coll, R.K., Ali, S., Bonato, J. et al. Investigating First-Year Chemistry Learning Difficulties in the South Pacific: A Case Study from Fiji. Int J Sci Math Educ 4, 365–390 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9007-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9007-6

Key Words

Search

Navigation