Abstract
Archaeologists have largely embraced the idea that our discipline is political; that from its inception it has been intimately linked to capitalism and implicated with nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, sexist and racist agendas. Archaeologists have always validated our existence by the social relevance of our work, often with varying success. We believe that the best method may be to study history backward: to begin with the present result and look to the past to consider its preconditions. Bringing these understandings forward again allows us to project this potential into the future and examine the present complete with its ties to the past. This dialectical connection of past, present and future provides an important perspective on the long-term historical study of the social relations of capitalism. In this paper, we provide the larger theoretical context to elucidate these issues that form the foundation for this issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Toward Pragmatism, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Beitl, C. M. (2012). Shifting policies, access, and tragedy of enclosures in Ecuadorian mangrove fisheries: towards a political ecology of the commons. Journal of Political Ecology 19: 94–113.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: The Political Ecology of Things, Duke University Press, Durham.
Collins, T. W. (2008). The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona’s White Mountains. Journal of Political Ecology 15: 21–43.
Conkey, M. W. (1991). Original narratives: the politcal economy of gender in archaeology. In di Leonadro, M. (ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 102–139.
Crumley, C. L., and Marquardt, W. H. (1987). Regional dynamics in Burgundy. In Crumley, C. L., and Marquardt, W. H. (eds.), Regional dynamics: Burgundian landscapes in historical perspective, Academic, San Diego, pp. 609–623.
Dawdy, S. L. (2009). Millennial archaeology: locating the discipline in the age of insecurity. Archaeological Dialogues 16: 131–142.
Eagleton, T. (2003). After Theory, Basic Books, New York.
Eagleton, T. (2008). Comrades and colons. In Mitchell, K. (ed.), Practicing Public Scholarship: Experiences and Possibilities Beyond the Academy, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, pp. 6–10.
Eagleton, T. (2011). Why Marx was Right, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Ebert, T. L., and Zavarzadeh, M. (2008). Class in Culture, Boulder, CO., Paradigm.
Escobar, A. (1999). After nature: steps to an anti-essentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology 40: 1–30.
Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Duke University Press, Durham, Redes.
Friedman, E., and Lee, C. K. (2010). Remaking the world of Chinese labour: a 30-year retrospective. British Journal of Industrial Relations 48: 507–533.
Greenberg, J. B. (2006). The political ecology of fisheries in the Upper Gulf of California. In Biersack, A., and Greenberg, J. B. (eds.), Reimagining Political Ecology, Duke University Press, Durham, pp. 121–148.
Harman, C. (2009). Zombie Capitalism, Haymarket Books, Chicago.
Jian, Y. (2012). China’s river pollution “a threat to people’s lives.”People's Daily Online. http://English.people.com.cn90882/7732438.html.
Johnson, M. (1996). An Archaeology of Capitalism, Blackwell, Oxford.
LaRoche, C. J., and Blakey, M. L. (1997). Seizing intellectual power: the dialogue of the New York African Burial Ground. Historical Archaeology 31: 84–106.
Leone, M. P. (1999). Setting some terms for historical archaeologies of capitalism. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, Kluwer, New York, pp. 3–22.
Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.) (1999). Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, Kluwer, New York.
Little, B. J. (2007). Historical Archaeology: Why the Past Matters, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
Little, B. J. (2010). Epilogue: changing the world with archaeology. In Stottman, M. J. (ed.), Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeology Change the World, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 154–158.
Little, B. J., and Shackel, P. A. (eds.) (2007). Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement, AltaMira, Lanham.
Marquardt, W. H. (1992). Dialectical archaeology. In Shiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 101–140.
Marx, K. (1963). The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, International Publishers, New York.
Marx, K. (1967). Capital, vol. I, International Publishers, New York.
Marx, K. (1971). Theories of Surplus Value, vol. 3, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
Mark, K. (1991). Capital: Volume III, Penguin, London.
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1970). The German Ideology, International Publishers, New York.
Matthews, C. N. (2010). The Archaeology of American Capitalism, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
McChesney, R. W., and Foster, J. B. (2010). Capitalism, the absurd system. Monthly. Review 62(2): 1–16.
McDavid, C. (2002). Archaeologies that hurt: descendants that matter: a pragmatic approach to collaboration in the public interpretation of African-American archaeology. World Archaeology 34: 303–314.
McDavid, C. (2010). Public archaeology, activism, and racism: rethinking the heritage “product. In Stottman, M. J. (ed.), Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeology Change the World? University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 36–47.
McGuire, R. H. (2008). Archaeology as Political Action, University of California Press, Berkeley.
McNally, D. (2011). Global Slump, PM Press, Oakland.
Mrozowski, S. A. (2006). The Archaeology of Class in Urban America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mrozowski, S. A. (2012). Ethnobiology for a diverse world: spaces and natures: archaeology and the political ecology of modern cities. Journal of Ethnobiology 32: 129–133.
Mrozowski, S. A., Herbster, H., Brown, D., and Priddy, K. L. (2009). Magunkaquog materiality, Federal recognition, and the search for deeper history. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 13: 430–463.
O’Donovan, M. (2002). Grasping power: a question of relations and scales. In O’Donoan, M. (ed.), The Dynamics of Power, Center for Archaeological Investigations and Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 19–34.
Ollman, B. (1993). Dialectical Investigations, Routledge, New York.
Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx’s Method, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Ollman, B., and Smith, T. (2008). Introduction. In Smith, T. (ed.), Ollman, B, Dialectics for a New Century. Palgrave, New York, pp. 1–7.
Orser, C. E. (1996). A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World, Plenum Press, New York.
Paynter, R. (1988). Steps to an archaeology of capitalism. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology inthe Eastern United States, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 407–433.
Pearce, M. (2011). Have rumours of the “death of theory” been exaggerated. In Bintliff, J., and Pearce, M. (eds.), The Death of Archaeological Theory, Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp. 80–89.
Preucel, R. W., and Bauer, A. A. (2001). Archaeological pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34: 85–96.
Rorty, R. (1998). Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope, Penguin, London.
Sabloff, J. A. (2008). Archaeology Matters: Action Archaeology in the Modern World, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
Saitta, D. J. (2007). The Archaeology of Collective Action, University Press of Florida, Gainsville.
Shackel, P. A. (2011). New Philadelphia: An Archaeology of Race in the Heartland, University of Calfornia Press, Berkeley.
Silliman, S. A. (ed.) (2008). Collaborative Archaeology at the Trowels Edge: Learning and Teaching in Indigenous Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Silliman, S. A. (2009). Change and continuity, practice and memory: native American persistence in colonial New England. American Antiquity 74: 211–230.
Silliman, S. W., and Ferguson, T. J. (2010). Consultation and collaboration with descendent communities. In Ashmore, W., Lippert, D. T., and Mills, B. J. (eds.), Voices in American Archaeology, SAA Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 48–72.
Stocking, G. W. (1968). On the limits of “presentism” and “historicism” in the historiography of the behavioral sciences. In Stocking, G. W. (ed.), Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–12.
Stottman, M. J. (ed.) (2010). Archaeologists as Activists: Can Archaeology Change the World, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Uggla, Y. (2010). What is this thing called “natural”? the nature-culture divide in climate change and biodiversity policy. Journal of Political Ecology 17: 79–91.
Wood, M. C. (2002). Women’s work and class conflict in a working-class coal-mining community. In O’Donovan, M. (ed.), The Dynamics of Power, Center for Archaeological Investigations and Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 66–87.
Wylie, A. (1999). Why should historical archaeologists study capitalism? the logic of question and answer and the challenge of system analysis. In Leone, M. P., and Potter Jr., P. B. (eds.), Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, Kluwer, New York, pp. 23–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wurst, L., Mrozowski, S.A. Toward an Archaeology of the Future. Int J Histor Archaeol 18, 210–223 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-014-0253-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-014-0253-6