Abstract
The use of different technologies and technological solutions for learning purposes is no longer a novelty in the educational environment. Digital teaching materials are being developed that can be used both in classroom activities and for providing students with opportunities for independent learning. However, alongside these materials, there are various additional opportunities that can be used in the educational process to make learning more interesting and to motivate learners to become more actively involved in the construction of their knowledge. One is mobile applications, where augmented reality (AR) solutions enable the anatomy to be learned interactively by accessing knowledge traditionally provided through two-dimensional teaching aids, or sometimes through static three-dimensional objects. Mobile applications with AR solutions allow to understand the anatomy from both the external and internal dimensions of the body without being in a specific laboratory or anatomy laboratory (anatomicum). This article summarizes the evaluation results of 41 applications analyzed in the first evaluation phase, and seven mobile applications that met all of the advanced selection criteria were selected for in-depth analyses using a developed evaluation framework with 19 criteria from three areas: (a) technological performance, (b) information architecture, and (c) educational value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altinpulluk, H. (2019). Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006–2016. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1089–1114.
Bal, E. (2018). The future of augmented reality and an overview on the to researches: A study of content analysis. Qualitative and Quantitative, 52, 2785–2793.
Barroso, O. J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., & Llorente-Cejudo, M. D. (2019). Difficulties in the incorporation of augmented reality in university education: Visions from the experts. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(2), 126–141.
Bergig, O., Hagbi, N., El-Sana, J., & Billinghurst, M. (2009). In-place 3D sketching for authoring and augmenting mechanical systems. 8th IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (pp. 87–94). ISMAR: Orlando.
Biezā, K. E. (2020). Digital literacy: Concept and definition. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society (IJSEUS), 11(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSEUS.2020040101.
Billinghurst, M., & Dunser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63.
Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experience during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505–517.
Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., Macintyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). Computers and education a psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers and Education, 68, 536–544.
Cai, S., Chiang, F.-K., Sun, Y., Lin, C., & Lee, J. J. (2017). Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 778–791.
Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F.-K. (2014). A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31–40.
Campos, P., & Pessanha, S. (2011). Designing augmented reality tangible interfaces for kindergarten children. In R. Shumaker (Ed.), Virtual and mixed reality—New Trends. VMR. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6773, pp. 12–19). Berlin: Springer.
Chen, P., Liu, X., Cheng, W., & Huang, R. (2017). A review of using augmented reality in education from 2011 to 2016. Innovations in smart learning (pp. 13–18). Singapore: Springer.
Collins, A. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cowling, M., & Birt, J. (2018). Pedagogy before technology: A design-based research approach to enhancing skills development in paramedic science using mixed reality. Information, 9(2), 29.
Daniela, L. (2020). Virtual Museums as Learning Agents. Sustainability, 12(7), 2698.
Daniela, L., & Aierken, Y. (2020). The educational perspective on virtual reality experiences of cultural heritage. Changing museums. In L. Daniela (Ed.), New perspectives on virtual and augmented reality: Finding new ways to teach in a transformed learning environment. London: Routledge.
DeLucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortoza, G. (2012). A collaborative augmented campus based on location-aware mobile technology. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 10(1), 55–71.
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers and Education, 68, 586–596.
Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers and Education, 69, 485–492.
Flavell, J. H., & Miller, S. M. (1993). Cognitive development. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Forsyth, E. (2011). Are u feeling appy? Augmented reality, apps and mobile access to local studies information. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 24(3), 125–132.
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27(1), 244–260.
Hitzler, R., & Eberle, T. S. (2004). Phenomenological life-world analysis. In U. Flick, et al. (Eds.), A Companion to qualitative research (pp. 57–72). London: Sage.
Höllerer, T., & Feiner, S. (2004). Mobile augmented reality. In H. Karimi & A. Hammad (Eds.), Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing and services (pp. 1–39). London: Taylor and Francis.
Honer, A. (2004). Life-world analysis in ethnography. In U. Flick, et al. (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 113–117). London: Sage.
Hwang, G.-J., Wu, P.-H., Chen, C.-C., & Tu, N.-T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students’ learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895–1906.
Karagozlu, D. (2018). Determination of the impact of augmented reality application on the success and problem-solving skills of students. Quality and Quantity, 52, 2393–2402.
Koutromanos, G., Sofos, A., & Avraamidou, L. (2015). The use of augmented reality games in education: a review of the literature. Educational Media International, 52(4), 253–271.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Augmented reality. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/augmented%2520reality.
Morrison, A., Mulloni, A., Lemmela, S., Oulasvirta, A., Jacucci, G., Peltonen, P., et al. (2011). Collaborative use of mobile augmented reality with paper maps. Computers and Graphics, 35(4), 789–799.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Transcendental phenomenology: conceptual framework. In C. Moustakas (Ed.), Phenomenological research methods (pp. 25–42). SAGE: Thousand Oaks.
Nischelwitzer, A., Lenz, F.-J., Searle, G., & Holzinger, A. (2007). Some aspects of the development of low-cost augmented reality learning environments as examples for future interfaces in technology enhanced learning. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: Applications and Services (pp. 728–737). Beijing: Springer.
Quinn, M. (2019, January). Digital Sshools? Teachers Still Matter. Journal of Chartered College of teaching. Retrieved August 18, 2019, from https://impact.chartered.college/article/digital-schools-teachers-still-matter/
Rodriguez-Pardo, C., Hernandez, S., Patricio, M. Á., Berlanga, A., & Molina, J. M. (2015). An augmented reality application for learning anatomy. In V. J. Ferrández, J. Álvarez-Sánchez, F. de la Paz López, F. Toledo-Moreo, & H. Adeli (Eds.), Bioinspired Computation in Artificial Systems IWINAC (pp. 359–368). Cham: Springer.
Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2013). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning (Vol. 2). Sterling: Stylus Publishing.
Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 165–169.
Wernet, A. (2014). Hermeneutics and objective hermeneutics. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 234–246). London: SAGE.
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62(2), 41–49.
Yuen, S. C.-Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 118–140.
Zghida, N., Lamrani, Z., & Janati-Idrissi, R. (2019). How Morocco's secondary school students classify animals. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society (IJSEUS), 10(3), 23–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dreimane, S., Daniela, L. Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Mobile Applications for Learning the Anatomy of the Human Body. Tech Know Learn 26, 763–788 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09461-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09461-7