Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Faculty Incentives for Online Course Design, Delivery, and Professional Development

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This quantitative study investigated the types and frequency of incentives for online instruction at non-profit institutions of higher education with an established teaching and learning development unit. While up to 70 % of institutions offer incentives, this support is not universal and varies by incentive type and purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States, 2008. Retrieved from the Sloan Consortium website: http://sloanconsortium.org/sites/default/files/staying_the_course-2.pdf

  • Allen I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Retrieved from the Sloan Consortium website: http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/learning_on_demand_sr2010

  • Allen I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Retrieved from the Sloan Consortium website: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/goingthedistance.pdf

  • Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on ELearning, 7, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, Z. L. (1998). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: Can policy changes fix it? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, I(2). Retrieved from: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer12/berge12.pdf

  • Berge, Z. L., & Muilenburg, L. Y. (2000). Barriers to distance education as perceived by managers and administrators: Results of a survey. In M. Clay (Ed.), Distance Learning Administration Annual 2000. Retrieved from: http://emoderators.com/wp-content/uploads/Man_admin.pdf

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2010). Classification description. Retrieved from: http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/descriptions/basic.php

  • Chou, C., & Tsai, C. C. (2002). Developing web-based curricula: Issues and challenges. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, W. W., & Wickersham, L. E. (2009). Best practices for online instructors: Reminders. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10, 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, J., & Mills, M. (2008). Perceptions of barriers concerning effective online teaching and policies: Florida community college faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 32, 266–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, N., & Bergen, C. (2000). Some design strategies for developing an online course. Educational Technology, 40, 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinson, J. M., & LaPrairie, K. N. (2005). Learning to Teach Online: Promoting Success through professional development. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 29, 483–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinuthia, W. (2005). Planning faculty development for successful implementation of web-based instruction. Campus - Wide Information Systems, 22(4), 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12, 25–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlenschmidt, S. (2011). Distribution and penetration of teaching-learning development units in higher education: Implications for strategic planning and research. In J. E. Miller & J. E. Groccia (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, 29, 274–287. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middle States Commission on Higher Education. (2002). Distance learning programs: Interregional guidelines for electronically offered degree and certificate programs. Philadelphia, PA: Author.

  • Morrow, T. (2003). Faculty development incentive at the University of Florida. In D. G. Brown (Ed.), Developing faculty to use technology (pp. 144–146). Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mupinga, D. M., & Maughan, G. R. (2008). Web-based instruction and community college faculty workload. College Teaching, 56, 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Integrated postsecondary education data system. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/

  • Ouellett, M. (2010). Overview of faculty development: History and choices. In K. J. Gillespie & D. L. Robertson (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (2nd ed., pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman, J. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset. Volume II: The paradox of faculty voices: Views and experiences with online learning. Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, M. (2007). Quality matters: Quality assurance in online courses. Magna Online Seminar. Broadcast March 20, 2007. Available at: http://www.magnapubs.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer H. Herman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herman, J.H. Faculty Incentives for Online Course Design, Delivery, and Professional Development. Innov High Educ 38, 397–410 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9248-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9248-6

Keywords

Navigation