Abstract
Student philanthropy is a teaching strategy designed to engage students actively in the curriculum, increase awareness of social needs and nonprofit organizations, and teach grant-writing and grant-making skills. This is the first study to examine long-term effects of student philanthropy by surveying alumni years after their experience with this teaching strategy. A majority of respondents indicated that student philanthropy had a positive effect on their awareness, learning, beliefs, and intentions. Further, 86% of student philanthropy alumni had recently made charitable contributions, 71% reported volunteering, and 15% served on nonprofit boards – all of which are much higher than the national averages for these behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, S., & Olberding, J.C. (2007/2008). Can student philanthropy help to address the current nonprofit identity crisis? A case study of a multiyear, multidisciplinary project at Northern Kentucky University.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13 (3/4), 593–615.
Bean, A. G., & Roszkowski, M. J. (1995). The long and short of it. Marketing Research, 7(1), 20–26.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. (2010). Volunteering in the United States, 2009. Retrieved from the Bureau of Labor Statistics web site: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/volun.nr0.htm
Campus Compact. (2010). Students4Giving. Retrieved from the Campus Compact web site: http://www.compact.org/program-models/students4giving/9952/
The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. (2008). Briefing on the economy and charitable giving. Retrieved from: http://www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/research/docs/December2008_BriefingOnTheEconomyAndGiving.pdf
Colgate University. (n.d.). Student Philanthropy Council. Retrieved from Colgate University’s Upstate Institute web site: http://upstate.colgate.edu/skills/studentphilanthropycouncil.aspx
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed surveys: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 447–462.
Irvin, R. A. (2005). The student philanthropists: Fostering civic engagement through grant making. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(4), 325–336.
Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Devine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(1), 94–101.
Management Strategies. (2008). Why do people join nonprofit boards? Retrieved from the Management Strategies web site: http://management-strategies.net/2008/01/12/why-do-people-join-nonprofit-boards.aspx
McDonald, D., & Olberding, J. C. Learning by giving: A quasi-experimental study of student philanthropy in criminal justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education (in press).
Mehta, R., & Sivadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 4(37), 429–440.
Midland College. (2007). Students in philanthropy. Retrieved from the Midland College web site: http://www.midland.edu/sip/
Millisor, J., & Olberding, J. C. (2009). Student philanthropy in colleges and universities. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 13(4), 11–16.
Northern Kentucky University. (n.d.) Mayerson Student Philanthropy Project. Retrieved from: http://www.nku.edu/~civicengage/involved/mayerson.php
Olberding, J. C. (2009). “Indirect giving” to nonprofit organizations: An emerging model of student philanthropy. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(4), 463–492.
Olberding, J. C., Neikirk, M., & Ng, D. (2010). Student philanthropy: A handbook for college and university faculty. Highland Heights, Ky.: Scripps Howard Center for Civic Engagement at Northern Kentucky University.
Paolo, A. M., Bonaminio, G. A., Gibson, C., Patridge, T., & Kallail, K. (2000). Response rate comparisons of e-mail and mail distributed student evaluations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12(2), 81–84.
Sheehan, K. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (2). Retrieved from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue2/sheehan.html
Sheehan, K. B., & Hoy, M. G. (1999). Using e-mail to survey internet users in the United States: Methodology and assessment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4 (3). Retrieved from: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue3/sheehan.html
Sheehan, K. B., & McMillan, S. J. (1999). Response variation in e-mail surveys: An exploration. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(4), 45–54.
Sigler, T. H. (2006). Live cases in organizational change: Learning about change through student philanthropy and service-learning. International Journal of Case Method Research and Application, 18(2), 193–199.
Smith, V.T., & Brooks, J.L. (2009). Creating a successful psychology service learning philanthropy course. Journal for Civic Commitment, Issue 7. Retrieved from: http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/other/engagement/Journal/Issue7/Smith.shtml
Student philanthropy project grants top $500 K mark. (2010, December 28). Kentucky Post. Retrieved from: http://www.kypost.com/dpp/news/local_news/student-philanthropy-project-grants-top-$500k-mark
Taylor, S., & Lynn, P. (1998). The effect of a preliminary notification letter on response to a postal survey of young people. Journal of the Market Research Society, 2(40), 165–178.
Weible, R., & Wallace, J. (1998). The impact of the Internet on data collection. Marketing Research, 10(3), 19–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A—Survey Instrument
Appendix A—Survey Instrument
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olberding, J.C. Does Student Philanthropy Work? A Study of Long-term Effects of the “Learning by Giving” Approach. Innov High Educ 37, 71–87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9189-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9189-5