Skip to main content
Log in

Finding an Analytic Frame for Faculty-Student Interaction within Faculty-in-Residence Programs

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we describe a case study analyzing how a Faculty-in-Residence program fosters student engagement. Using Cox & Orehovec’s typology to add granularity to the National Study on Student Engagement’s criteria for student engagement, we suggest best practices for the implementation of these in-situ faculty engagement programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, W. C., Hester, J. L., MacEntee, V. M., Mackenzie, J. A., Morey, T. M., Nichols, J. T., et al. (2008). Beyond lip-service: An operational definition of “learning-centered college. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. N., Headworth, S., & Saum, K. (2009). The rare, but promising, involvement of faculty in residence hall programming. College Student Journal, 43(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S. R., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student–faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51, 487–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. E., & Orehovec, E. (2007). Faculty–student interaction outside the classroom: A typology from a residential college. The Review of Higher Education, 30, 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geri, L., Kuehn, D., & MacGregor, J. (1999). From innovation to reform: Reflections on case studies of 19 learning community initiatives. In J. MacGregor (Ed.), Strengthening learning communities: Case studies from the National Learning Communities Dissemination Project. (FIPSE). Olympia, WA: The Evergreen State College, Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research (2008). National Survey of Student Engagement (2008). National Survey of Student Engagement Benchmarks. Retrieved on May 25, 2009, from http://nsse.iub.edu/html/pocket_guide_intro.cfm

  • Mathew, P. (1997). The importance of on-campus living. Unpublished manuscript, North Dakota State University.

  • Medders, J. (2009). Faculty in residence education. Retrieved on May 25, 2009, from http://www.ndsu.edu/reslife/living_learning_program/faculty_in_residence_education/

  • Medders, J. (n.d.). Faculty-in-residence. North Dakota State University. Retrieved July 25, 2010, from http://www.ndsu.edu/reslife/living_learning_program/faculty_in_residence/

  • Shushok, F. Jr., Henry, D. V., Blalock, G., Sriram, R. R. (2009). Learning at any time: Supporting student learning wherever it happens. InterScience March–April, 2009. Retrieved July 10, 2009, from www.interscience.wiley.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Mara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mara, M., Mara, A. Finding an Analytic Frame for Faculty-Student Interaction within Faculty-in-Residence Programs. Innov High Educ 36, 71–82 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9162-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9162-8

Key words

Navigation