Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research Activities: Are Research Universities Doing a Better Job?

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engaging undergraduate students in research activities has been advocated as an innovative strategy to improve American higher education (Boyer Commission, Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Stony Brook, NY, 1998). This study compared the frequency of undergraduate student research experiences at different types of colleges and universities from the early 1990s through 2004. The results indicate that the frequency of student research experiences increased since 1998 at all types of institutions and that students at research universities were not more likely than their counterparts elsewhere to have such experiences. The findings were consistent across major fields. To live up to their claims, research universities must find additional ways to involve undergraduates in research with faculty members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (1998). Comparative higher education: Knowledge, the university, and development. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron’s Profiles of American Colleges (2002). Hauppage, NY: Barron’s Educational Series.

  • Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1994). A classification of institutions of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Undergraduate Research. (2003). Faculty-undergraduate collaborative research and publishing. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from http://www.cur.org/wp_respub.html

  • Duke University (2006). Duke University bulletin of undergraduate instruction 2006-07: Degree programs. Retrieved March 21, 2007, from http://www.registrar.duke.edu/bulletins/Undergraduate/2006-07/degrees.pdf

  • Ethington, C. A., Thomas, S. L., & Pike, G. R. (2002). Back to the basics: Regression as it should be. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol. 17 (pp. 263–293). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T., & Jones, D. P. (1996). Indicators of “good practice” in undergraduate education: A handbook for development and implementation. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (1993). Research and relevant knowledge: American research universities since World War II. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonyea, R. M., Kish, K. A., Kuh, G. D., Muthiah, R. N., & Thomas, A. D. (2003). College Student Experiences Questionnaire: Norms for the fourth edition. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, C. (2001). Undergraduate research, graduate mentoring, and the university’s mission. Science, 293, 1624–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H. D., & Diamond, N. (1997). The rise of American research universities: Elites and challengers in the postwar era. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 614–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S., & Sammon, S. (2007). Inquiry in higher education: Reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education, 31, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katkin, W. (2003). The Boyer Commission Report and its impact on undergraduate research. In J. Kinkead (Ed.), Valuing and supporting undergraduate research (pp. 19–38). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). Learning productivity at research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 72, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., & Gonyea, R. M. (2006). Connecting the dots: Multi-faceted analyses of the relationships between student engagement results from the NSSE, and the institutional practices and conditions that foster student success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N., Connolly, M. R., & Pace, C. R. (1997). College student experiences questionnaire: Revised norms for the third edition. Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, School of Education, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1994). In defense of the research university. In J. R. Cole, E. G. Barber, & S. R. Graubard (Eds.), The research university in a time of discontent (pp. 219–224). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A. C. (2000). The 2000 Carnegie classification: Background and description. Retrieved on April 5, 2005, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classification/CIHE2000/background.htm

  • Merkel, C. A. (2003). Undergraduate research at the research universities. In J. Kinkead (Ed.), Valuing and supporting undergraduate research (pp. 39–53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Review of Higher Education, 22, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Survey of Student Engagement. (2005). Student engagement: Exploring different dimensions of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nnadozie, E., Ishiyama, J., & Chon, J. (2001). Undergraduate research internships and graduate school success. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, D. (1958). The academic profession. In D. Riesman (ed.), Constraint and variety in American education (pp. 25–65). Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosovsky, H. (1990). The university: An owner’s manual. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, J. F., & Carbone, D. A. (1994). The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, M. (2005, August 12). How to find students’ inner geek. Chronicle of Higher Education, B5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shouping Hu.

Additional information

Shouping Hu

is Associate Professor of Higher Education at Florida State University. He received his M.S. degree in Economics and Ph.D. in Higher Education from Indiana University. His research and scholarship focuses on postsecondary access and persistence, college student experience, and higher education finance.

George D. Kuh

is Chancellor’s Professor of Higher Education and Director of the Center for Postsecondary Research at Indiana University Bloomington. He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Iowa. His research focuses on the quality of undergraduate education.

Joy Gaston Gayles

is Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at North Carolina State University. She received her Bachelor’s degree from Shaw University, Master’s degree from Auburn University, and Ph.D. in Higher Education from The Ohio State University. Her research focuses on college student learning and development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, S., Kuh, G.D. & Gayles, J.G. Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research Activities: Are Research Universities Doing a Better Job?. Innov High Educ 32, 167–177 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-007-9043-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-007-9043-y

Key words

Navigation