Skip to main content
Log in

Feeding of fish inhabiting native and non-native macrophyte stands in a Neotropical reservoir

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Owning to dissimilarity with native macrophytes, invasive macrophytes may negatively affect the diet and foraging efficiency of fishes. We evaluated the invertebrate availability, diet composition, and foraging efficiency of four fish species that use macrophytes as habitat in a native and a highly invasive macrophyte. The samples were taken in a reservoir in Brazil (22° 33′ S, 52°54′ W). We collected invertebrates and fishes simultaneously in macrophyte stands dominated by the invasive Poaceae Urochloa arrecta and the native Eichhornia azurea. We evaluated the foraging efficiency by the total number of prey consumed and by the degree of stomach fullness. We used an approach based on resampling procedures to compare differences in composition of invertebrates, composition of fish diet, and the similarity between invertebrates and fish diet. The abundance of invertebrates and the diet composition differed significantly between plants. On the other hand, fish foraging efficiency did not differ between macrophytes. Despite this lack of difference of foraging efficiency, the lower abundance of food items in the invasive macrophyte and the significant changes in fish diet suggest that U. arrecta is not a favorable feeding habitat for fishes, compared to the native E. azurea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algarte, V. M., N. S. Siqueira, D. T. Ruwer, N. C. Osorio & L. Rodrigues, 2017. Richness of periphytic algae and its relationship with hydrological attributes. Brazilian Jounal Botanic 40: 735–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amorim, S. R., C. A. Umetsu, D. Toledo & A. F. M. Camargo, 2015. Effects of a non native species of Poaceae on aquatic macrophyte community composition: A comparison with a native species. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 53: 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrend, R. D. L., M. C. Teixeira, S. L. P. Fernandes, J. C. Camargo, G. C. Rosin & A. M. Takeda, 2013. Effects of a native and a non- native macrophyte species of Hydrocharitaceae on Chironomidae and Oligochaeta assemblages structure. Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences 35: 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carniatto, N., R. Fugi, G. Cantanhêde, É. A. Gubiani & N. S. Hahn, 2012. Effects of flooding regime and diel cycle on diet of a small sized fish associated to macrophytes. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 24: 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carniatto, N., S. M. Thomaz, E. R. Cunha, R. Fugi & R. R. Ota, 2013. Effects of an invasive alien Poaceae on aquatic macrophytes and fish communities in a Neotropical Reservoir. Biotropica 45: 747–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casatti, L., H. F. Mendes & K. M. Ferreira, 2003. Aquatic macrophytes as feeding site for small fishes in the Rosana Reservoir, Paranapanema River, Southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63: 213–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CESP - Companhia Energética de São Paulo, 1998. Conservação e manejo nos reservatórios: limnologia, ictiologia e pesca. Série Divulgação e Informação. CESP - Companhia Energética de São Paulo, São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colon-Gaud, J. C., W. E. Kelso & D. A. Rutherford, 2004. Spatial distribution of macroinvertebrates inhabiting hydrilla and coontail beds in the Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 42: 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, E. D. & F. M. Pelicice, 2010. Influence of aquatic plant-specific habitat on an assemblage of small Neotropical floodplain fishes. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 19: 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, E. D., K. J. Killgore & S. L. Harrel, 1996. Assessment of fish-plant interaction. American Fish Society 16: 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. M. & R. A. O’Connor, 2003. Effects of the exotic macrophyte, para grass (Urochloa mutica), on benthic and epiphytic macroinvertebrates of a tropical floodplain. Freshwater Biology 48: 962–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmoor-Loureiro, M. L. A., 1997. Manual de identificação de cladóceros límnicos do Brasil. Editora Universo, Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, B., M. Clavero, M. I. Sanchez & M. Vila, 2016. Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Global Change Biology 22: 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli, N. & R. K. Colwell, 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higuti, J. & K. Martens, 2016. Invasive South American floating plants are a successful substrate for native Central African pleuston. Biological Invasions 18: 1191–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussner, A., I. Stiers, M. J. J. M. Verhofstad, E. S. Bakker, B. M. C. Grutters, J. Haury, J. L. C. H. Van Valkenburg, G. Brundu, J. Newman, J. S. Clayton, L. W. J. Anderson & D. Hofstra, 2017. Management and control methods of invasive alien freshwater aquatic plants: a review. Aquatic Botany 136: 112–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovalenko, K. E., S. M. Thomaz & D. M. Warfe, 2012. Habitat complexity: approaches and future directions. Hydrobiologia 685: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehne, L. M., J. D. Olden & E. S. Rubenson, 2016. Multi-trophic impacts of an invasive aquatic plant. Freshwater Biology 61: 1846–1861.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. A., K. Bourke, S. C. Lishawa & N. C. Tuchman, 2016. Typha invasion associated with reduced aquatic macroinvertebrate abundance in northern Lake Huron coastal wetlands. Journal of Great Lakes Research 42: 1412–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCafferty, W. P., 1983. Aquatic entomology: The fishermen’s and ecologists’ illustrated guide to insects and their relative. Jones and Bartlett Learning Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormul, R. P., S. M. Thomaz, M. J. Silveira & L. Rodrigues, 2010. Ostracod (Crustacea) colonization of a nativeand a non-native macrophyte species of Hydrocharitaceae in the Upper Paraná floodplain (Brazil): an experimental evaluation. Hydrobiologia 644: 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palkovacs, E. P. & D. M. Post, 2009. Experimental evidence that phenotypic divergence in predators drives community divergence in prey. Ecology 90: 300–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelicice, F. M. & A. A. Agostinho, 2009. Fish fauna destruction after the introduction of a non-native predator (Cichla kelberi) in a Neotropical reservoir. Biological Invasions 11: 1789–1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C., 1975. Ecological Diversity. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, D. M., E. P. Palkovacs, E. G. Schielke & S. I. Dodson, 2008. Intraspecific phenotypic variation in a predator affects community structure and cascading trophic interactions. Ecology 89: 2019–2032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pott, V. J., A. Pott, L. C. P. Lima & A. K. M. Oliveira, 2011. Aquatic macrophyte diversity of the Pantanal wetland and upper basin. Brazilian Journal Biology 71: 255–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prado, A. V. R., E. Goulart & J. P. A. Pagotto, 2016. Ecomorphology and use of food resources: inter- and intraspecific relationships of fish fauna associated with macrophyte stands. Neotropical Ichthyology 14: e150140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priyadarshana, T., T. Asaeda & J. Manatunge, 2001. Foraging behaviour of planktivorous fish in artificial vegetation: the effects on swimming and feeding. Hydrobiologia 442: 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, B. L., M. R. Bornschein & C. Firkowski, 2007. Distribuição, tamanho populacional, habitat e conservação do bicudinho-do-brejo, Stymphalornis acutirostris Bornschein. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 15: 493–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, S. M. & M. J. Maceina, 2006. Changes in diet and food consumption of largemouth bass following large-scale hydrilla reduction in Lake Seminole, Georgia. Hydrobiologia 560: 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savino, J. F. & R. A. Stein, 1989. Behavioural interactions between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant density. Animal Behaviour 37: 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R. & E. Dibble, 2012. Effects of invasive macrophytes on freshwater fish and macroinvertebrate communities: the role of invasive plant traits. Hydrobiologia 684: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva Matos, D. M. & V. R. Pivello, 2009. O impacto das plantas invasoras nos recursos naturais de ambientes terrestres – alguns casos brasileiros. Ciência e Cultura 61: 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiers, I., N. Crohain, G. Josens & L. Triest, 2011. Impact of three aquatic invasive species on native plants and macroinvertebrates in temperate ponds. Biological Invasions 13: 2715–2726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, H., S. Takano & M. Tokeshi, 2003. Influences of habitat complexity on the diversity and abundance of epiphytic invertebrates on plants. Freshwater Biology 48: 718–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theel, H. J., E. D. Dibble & J. D. Madsen, 2008. Differential influence of a monotypic and diverse native aquatic plant bed on a macroinvertebrate assemblage: an experimental implication of exotic plant induced habitat. Hydrobiologia 600: 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomaz, S. M. & E. R. Cunha, 2010. The role of macrophytes in habitat structuring in aquatic ecosystems: methods of measurement, causes and consequences on animal assemblages’ composition and biodiversity. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 22: 218–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. & G. E. Likens, 1991. Limnological Analysis. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. J. & A. Ricciard, 2009. Epiphytic macroinvertebrate communities on Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and native milfoils Myriophyllum sibericum and Myriophyllum alterniflorum in eastern North America. Canadian Jounal Fish Aquatic Science 66: 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Associate Editor Katya E. Kovalenko and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments; the Brazilian Council of Research (CNPq) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for financial support and infrastructure for developing this study. N. Carniatto, B. A. Quirino, E. R. Cunha and S. M. Thomaz acknowledge the Brazilian Council of Research (CNPq and CAPES) for providing grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bárbara Angélio Quirino.

Additional information

Handling editor: Katya E. Kovalenko

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carniatto, N., Cunha, E.R., Thomaz, S.M. et al. Feeding of fish inhabiting native and non-native macrophyte stands in a Neotropical reservoir. Hydrobiologia 847, 1553–1563 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04212-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04212-2

Keywords

Navigation