Abstract
Copper poses a risk to the integrity of the Thames Estuary and Marshes special protection area (SPA) as bioaccumulation within the food chain takes place. This article describes some of the investigations carried out for the Habitats Directive Review of Consents including a review of the methods used to analyse copper samples; analysis of the long-term data sets gathered by the Environment Agency; and modelling work. Mean dissolved copper levels for 2002–2006 are below the 5 μg/l Environmental Quality Standard. Catchment modelling was used to establish total copper budgets both for sources discharging directly to the Tideway and for sources throughout the Thames catchment including sewage treatment works (STWs), industries, non-urban, and urban runoff. The total copper load to the Tideway was estimated to be 36 tonnes/year with 52% of this attributed to STWs. Modelling was used to explore the mixing, transport and fate of copper throughout the estuary taking account of partitioning and the interaction with sediments. The modelling showed how the fourth Water Industry Asset Management Programme (AMP4) improvements to the main London STWs would affect copper concentrations throughout the estuary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attrill, M. J. & R. Myles Thomes, 1995. Heavy metal concentrations in sediment from the Thames Estuary, UK. Marine Pollution Bulletin 30: 742–744.
Chambers, V. K., P. Dempsey, P. Lloyd & M. Clement, 2005. Impact of Discharges on the Water Quality of the Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA Modelling Report. WRc Report UC6916.
Crabtree, B., S. Kelly, H. Green, G. Squibbs & G. Mitchell, 2009. Water Framework Directive catchment planning: a case study apportioning loads and assessing environmental benefits of programme of measures. Water Science and Technology 59: 407–416.
Department of Communities and Local Government, 2007. Generalised Land Use Database Statistics for England 2005.
Environment Agency, 2006. Factsheet on the Thames Estuary and Marshes Special Area of Conservation.
Environment Agency, 2007. Standing Committee of Analysts. Index of Methods for the Examination of Waters and Associated Materials 1976–2008.
Gardner, M. J., 2007. Review of possible metal contamination in filtered water samples. Environment Agency Research and Development Project Record EA7478.
Kelly, S., P. Dempsey & D. Murray, 2008. Thames Region Copper Budget. WRc Report UC7632.
Murray, D., M. Song & P. Dempsey, 2008. Trends and Patterns in Thames Tideway Copper Data. WRc Report UC7652.
O’Reilly Wiese, S. B., C. L. Macleod & J. N. Lester, 1997. A recent history of metal accumulation in the sediments of the Thames Estuary, United Kingdom. Estuaries 20: 483–493.
Power, M., M. J. Attrill & R. M. Thomas, 1999. Heavy metal concentration trends in the Thames Estuary. Water Research 33: 1672–1680.
Stevenson, C. & B. Ng, 1999. Distribution of copper, nickel and zinc in the Thames Estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38: 328–331.
Uncles, R. J. & S. B. Mitchell, 2011.Turbidity in the Thames Estuary: how turbid do we expect it to be? doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0757-6.
Wang, T. & M. Cresser, 2007. Evaluating alternative river management options in the tidal Ouse using the QUESTS1D model. Science of the Total Environment 373: 1–12.
Acknowledgments
This article has been produced with the permission of the Directors of WRc and the Environment Agency. The views expressed in the article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of WRc or the Environment Agency. The authors are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers whose contributions have been used to improve this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Guest editors: R. J. Uncles & S. B. Mitchell / The Thames Estuary and Estuaries of South East England
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, D., Dempsey, P. & Lloyd, P. Copper in the Thames Estuary in relation to the special protection areas. Hydrobiologia 672, 39–47 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0756-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0756-7