Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic diversity and differentiation of fragmented reedbeds (Phragmites australis) in the United Kingdom

  • Primary research paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reedbeds, which are dominated by the common reed Phragmites australis, provide one of the most important aquatic habitats in the United Kingdom, and have been identified as a priority habitat under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. Ongoing conservation and management of reedbeds is necessary because past eradication and fragmentation have been extensive. However, there has been little consideration of the potential long-term effects that may arise if processes such as founder effects during restoration projects, or genetic bottlenecks following harvesting, are leading to reductions in genetic diversity. In this study, we used microsatellite data to compare the genetic diversity of 19 P. australis stands in the UK, and found that neither size, management, nor habitat disturbance were affecting genetic diversity. Mixed reproduction (clonal and sexual), possibly combined with gene flow across relatively small spatial scales, appears to be maintaining genetic diversity within most stands. However, most stands were highly genetically differentiated from one another, which implies low gene flow. Long-term genetic diversity in managed stands may therefore require periodic bolstering from other populations, combined with the simultaneous cultivation of multiple generations. In addition, low gene flow suggests that managers should actively introduce plants into all areas in which reedbeds are desired. In conclusion, our study shows that reedbed restoration and maintenance do not seem to be adversely affecting the population genetics of P. australis, but the importance of genetic diversity should be factored into long-term projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, M. G., F. Tron & F. Mauchamp, 2005. A sexual versus asexual colonization by Phragmites australis: 25-year reed dynamics in a Mediterranean marsh, Southern France. Wetlands 25: 639–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clevering, O. A. & J. Lissner, 1999. Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis. Aquatic Botany 64: 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coops, H. & G. Van der Velde, 1995. Seed dispersal, germination and seedling growth of six helophyte species in relation to water-level zonation. Freshwater Biology 34: 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorken, M. E. & C. G. Eckert, 2001. Severely reduced sexual reproduction in northern populations of a clonal plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Journal of Ecology 89: 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 2005. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.6. Distributed by the Author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, W. H., R. Q. Wang, S. L. Zhou, S. P. Zhang & Z. G. Zhang, 2003. Genetic diversity and clonal structure of Phragmites australis in the Yellow River delta of China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 31: 1093–1109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. L., C. Lambertin, A. Jampeetong & H. Brix, 2007. Clone-specific differences in Phragmites australis: effects of ploidy level and geographic origin. Aquatic Botany 86: 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, C. J. & P. V. Jose, 1996. Reedbed Use for Commercial and Wildlife Interests. RSPB Management Guides, RSPB, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, K. E. & P. O. Lewis, 2003. Hickory: a package for analysis of population genetic data v1.1. Distributed by the authors. University of Connecticut, Storrs.

  • Holsinger, K. E., P. O. Lewis & D. K. Dey, 2002. A Bayesian approach to inferring population structure from dominant markers. Molecular Ecology 11: 1157–1164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huff, D. R., R. Peakall & P. E. Smouse, 1993. RAPD variation within and among populations of outcrossing buffalograss (Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Englem.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 927–934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski, S. T., 2005. Do polymorphic loci require large sample sizes to estimate genetic distances? Heredity 94: 33–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koppitz, H., 1999. Analysis of genetic diversity among selected populations of Phragmites australis world-wide. Aquatic Botany 64: 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppitz, H. & H. Kühl, 2000. To the importance of genetic diversity of Phragmites australis in the development of reed stands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8: 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertini, C., M. H. G. Gustafsson, J. Frydenberg, M. Speranza & H. Brix, 2008. Genetic diversity patterns in Phragmites australis at the population, regional and continental scales. Aquatic Botany 88: 160–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • League, M. T., E. P. Colbert, D. M. Seliskar & J. L. Gallagher, 2006. Rhizome growth dynamics of native and exotic haplotypes of Phragmites australis (common reed). Estuaries and Coasts 29: 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mal, T. & L. Narine, 2004. The biology of Canadian weeds. 129. Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 84: 365–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, J. & A. J. Richards, 1996. Variation in seed production and germinability in common reed (Phragmites australis) in Britain and France with respect to climate. New Phytologist 133: 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obbard, D. J., S. A. Harris & J. R. Pannell, 2006. Simple allelic-phenotype diversity and differentiation statistics for allopolyploids. Heredity 97: 296–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall, R. & P. E. Smouse, 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin, D. & D. P. Hauber, 1999. Isozyme variation among populations of the clonal species, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel. Aquatic Botany 63: 241–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raicu, P., S. Staicu, V. Stoian & T. Roman, 1972. The Phragmites communis Trin., chromosome complement in the Danube Delta. Hydrobiologia 39: 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, J. S., 1995. Aquatic Communities, Swamps and Tall-Herb Fens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltonstall, K., 2003. Microsatellite variation within and among North American lineages of Phragmites australis. Molecular Ecology 12: 1689–1702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UK Biodiversity Action Plan for Reedbeds. 1995. http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=19.

  • van der Putten, W. H., 1997. Die-back of Phragmites australis in European wetlands: an overview of the European research programme on reed die-back and progression (1993–1994). Aquatic Botany 59: 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, B. S. & C. Cockerham, 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, B. D., 1992. Integrating wildlife with commercial uses. In Ward, D. (ed.), Reedbeds for Wildlife. University of Bristol/RSPB, Sandy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Trent University. Thanks to Eva Conrad for assistance with field work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Freeland.

Additional information

Handling editor: Christian Sturmbauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, J., Kirk, H. & Freeland, J. Genetic diversity and differentiation of fragmented reedbeds (Phragmites australis) in the United Kingdom. Hydrobiologia 665, 107–115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0608-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0608-5

Keywords

Navigation