Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diversity and community biomass depend on dispersal and disturbance in microalgal communities

  • SANTA ROSALIA 50 YEARS ON
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evidence for species diversity effects on ecosystem functions is mainly based on studies not explicitly addressing local or regional processes regulating coexistence or the importance of community structure in terms of species evenness. In experimental communities of marine benthic microalgae, we altered the successional stages and thus the strength of local species interactions by manipulating rates of dispersal and disturbance. The treatments altered realized species richness, evenness and community biomass. For species richness, dispersal mattered only at high disturbance rates; when opening new space, dispersal led to maximized richness at intermediate dispersal rates. Evenness, in contrast, decreased with dispersal at low or no disturbance, i.e. at late successional stages. Community biomass showed a non-linear hump-shaped response to increasing dispersal at all disturbance levels. We found a positive correlation between richness and biomass at early succession, and a strong negative correlation between evenness and biomass at late succession. In early succession both community biomass and richness depend directly on dispersal from the regional pool, whereas the late successional pattern shows that if interactions allow the most productive species to become dominant, diverting resources from this species (i.e. higher evenness) reduces production. Our study emphasizes the difference in biodiversity–function relationships over time, as different mechanisms contribute to the regulation of richness and evenness in early and late successional stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cadotte, M. W., 2006. Dispersal and species diversity: a meta-analysis. American Naturalist 167: 913–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte, M. W., D. V. Mai, S. Jantz, M. D. Collins, M. Keele & J. A. Drake, 2006. On testing the competition–colonization trade-off in a multispecies assemblage. American Naturalist 168: 704–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calcagno, V., N. Mouquet, P. Jarne & P. David, 2006. Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition–colonization trade-off is not dead. Ecology Letters 9: 897–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale, B. J. & M. A. Palmer, 2002. Disturbance moderates biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships: experimental evidence from caddisflies in stream mesocosms. Ecology 83: 1915–1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale, B. J., A. R. Ives & P. Inchausti, 2004. Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference. Oikos 104: 437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale, B. J., D. S. Srivastava, J. E. Duffy, J. P. Wright, A. L. Downing, M. Sankaran & C. Jouseau, 2006a. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443: 989–992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale, B. J., H. Hillebrand & D. F. Charles, 2006b. Geographic patterns of diversity in streams are predicted by a multivariate model of disturbance and productivity. Journal of Ecology 94: 609–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, B. K., A. Rubach & H. Hillebrand, 2006. Biotic habitat complexity controls species diversity and nutrient effects on net biomass production. Ecology 87: 254–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J., 1997. Applied Regression, Linear Models, and Related Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. W., 2005. Interpreting the ‘selection effect’ of biodiversity on ecosystem function. Ecology Letters 8: 846–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France, K. E. & J. E. Duffy, 2006. Diversity and dispersal interactively affect predictability of ecosystem function. Nature 441: 1139–1143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gamfeldt, L., H. Hillebrand & P. R. Jonsson, 2008. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89: 1223–1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, A., 1980. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theoretical Population Biology 18: 363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, H. & B. Matthiessen, 2009. Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecology Letters 12: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, H. & U. Sommer, 2000. Diversity of benthic microalgae in response to colonization time and eutrophication. Aquatic Botany 67: 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, H., C.-D. Dürselen, D. Kirschtel, U. Pollinger & T. Zohary, 1999. Biovolume calculations for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 103–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, H., D. S. Gruner, E. T. Borer, M. E. S. Bracken, E. E. Cleland, J. J. Elser, W. S. Harpole, J. T. Ngai, E. W. Seabloom, J. B. Shurin & J. E. Smith, 2007. Consumer versus resource control of producer diversity depends on ecosystem type and producer community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 10904–10909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, H., D. Bennet & M. W. Cadotte, 2008. Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes. Ecology 89: 165–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold & R. D. Holt, 2005. Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin III, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, J. H. Lawton, D. M. Lodge, M. Loreau, S. Naeem, B. Schmid, H. Setälä, A. J. Symstad, J. Vandermeer & D. A. Wardle, 2005. Effects on biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. B. & C. B. Omland, 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 101–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kneitel, J. M. & T. M. Miller, 2003. Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. American Naturalist 162: 165–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical Ecology, 2nd English ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibold, M. A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau & A. Gonzalez, 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7: 601–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. & D. Culver, 1971. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 68: 1246–1248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M. & A. Hector, 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412: 72–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M., S. Naeem & P. Inchausti, 2002. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, H. K., H. S. Lenihan, B. J. Bourque, R. H. Bradbury, R. G. Cooke, M. C. Kay, S. M. Kidwell, M. X. Kirby, C. H. Peterson & J. B. C. Jackson, 2006. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312: 1806–1809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, B. & H. Hillebrand, 2006. Dispersal frequency affects local biomass production by controlling local diversity. Ecology Letters 9: 652–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, B., L. Gamfeldt, H. Hillebrand & P. Jonsson, 2007. Effects of grazer richness and composition on algal biomass in a closed and open marine system. Ecology 87: 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, B., E. Mielke & U. Sommer, 2010. Dispersal decreases diversity in heterogeneous metacommunities by enhancing regional competition. Ecology 91: 2022–2033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet, N., J. L. Moore & M. Loreau, 2002. Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecology Letters 5: 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, J., D. P. Swaney, J. Dushoff, J. Lin, R. Casagrandi & S. A. Levin, 2001. Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: a theoretical framework. PNAS 98: 11376–11381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Östman, Ö., J. M. Kneitel & J. M. Chase, 2006. Disturbance alters habitat isolation’s effect on biodiversity in aquatic microcosms. Oikos 114: 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.

  • Tilman, D., 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75: 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., P. B. Reich & J. M. H. Knops, 2006. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441: 629–632.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, D. A., 1999. Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships? Oikos 87: 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. J., B. J. Cardinale, K. J. Forshay & A. R. Ives, 2007. Effects of species diversity on community biomass production change over the course of succession. Ecology 88: 929–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. W. & H. B. Wilson, 2001. The competition–colonization trade-off is dead; long live the competition–colonization trade-off. American Naturalist 158: 49–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study profited greatly from comments by Bradley Cardinale. Kerstin Mascazssek and Sandra Fehsenfels are gratefully acknowledged for help in the laboratory. The research was conducted under financial support from German Research Foundation (DFG contract HI 848/1-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birte Matthiessen.

Additional information

Guest editors: L. Naselli-Flores & G. Rossetti / Fifty years after the “Homage to Santa Rosalia”: Old and new paradigms on biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 773 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthiessen, B., Ptacnik, R. & Hillebrand, H. Diversity and community biomass depend on dispersal and disturbance in microalgal communities. Hydrobiologia 653, 65–78 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0349-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0349-x

Keywords

Navigation