Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Applicability of ecological evaluation tools in estuarine ecosystems: the case of the lower Mondego estuary (Portugal)

  • ECSA39
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In accordance with the Water Framework Directive guidelines (WFD, 2000, European Communities Official Journal L327 2000/60/EC), classification schemes and ecological evaluation tools (based on benthic invertebrate fauna data sets from 1990 to 2002) were applied in the lower Mondego estuary. Two distinct scenarios could be tested due to the implementation of mitigation practices in 1999, following a long eutrophication process, which started by the early 1980s. Some discrepancies in the results were found by the application of the different indices. The AMBI index (accounting for taxonomic composition) and the ABC method (accounting for abundance and biomass k-dominance patterns) classifications often disagreed with those based on species diversity (Margalef and Shannon-Wiener). The ambiguous results made the classification a complex task to achieve, contrary to the Directive’s objective of maintaining it simple and clear. Our results suggest the necessity of adjusting some of the indices and their ranges to estuarine characteristics, namely to account the typical dominance and abundance of some particular species. These aspects are not taken into consideration by some of the indices proposed, which are more adapted to typical marine conditions. Based on our results, these widely applied indices might still improve their efficiency in estuarine systems allowing their use in the resembling types already established within the new Directive agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AZTI, 2004. AZTI tecnalia: investigación marina y alimentaria. http://www.azti.es.

  • Bellan-Santini, D., 1980. Relationship between populations of amphipods and pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin 11: 224–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, A., S. B. Bricker, J. G. Ferreira, A. Franco, J. C. Marques, J. J. Melo, A. Nobre, L. Ramos, C. S. Reis, F. Salas, M. C. Silva, T. Simas & W. Wolff, 2004. Typology and Reference Conditions for Portuguese Transitional and Coastal Waters. Instituto da Água. Instituto do Mar, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beukema, J. J., 1988. An evaluation of the ABC-method (abundance/biomass comparison) as applied to macrozoobenthic communities living on tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Marine Biology 99: 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beukema, J. J., R. Dekker, K. Essink & H. Michaelis, 2001. Synchronized reproductive success of the main bivalve species in the Wadden Sea: causes and consequences. Marine Ecology Progress Series 211: 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borja, A., J. Franco & I. Muxika, 2003. Classification Tools for Marine Ecological Quality Assessment: the Usefulness of Macrobenthic Communities in an Area Affected by a Submarine Outfall. ICES C. M. 2003/J:02,. ICES, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borja, A., J. Franco & V. Pérez, 2000. A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40: 1100–1114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borja, A., J. Franco, V. Valencia, J. Bald, I. Muxika, M. J. Belzunce & O. Solaun, 2004. Implementation of the European water framework directive from the Basque country (Northern Spain): a methodological approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 48: 209–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borja, A. & I. Muxika, 2005. Guidelines for the use of AMBI (AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index) in the assessment of the benthic ecological quality. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50: 787–789.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boström, C., E. Bonsdorff, P. Kangas & A. Norkko, 2002. Long-term changes of a brackish-water eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) community indicate effects of coastal eutrophication. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55: 795–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, P. G., A. Brandão, M. A. Pardal, D. Raffaelli & J. C. Marques, 2005. Resilience of Hydrobia ulvae populations to anthropogenic and natural disturbances. Marine Ecology Progress Series 289: 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, P. G., M. A. Pardal, A. I. Lillebø, S. M. Ferreira, D. Raffaelli & J. C. Marques, 2004. Dynamic changes in seagrass assemblages under eutrophication and implications for recovery. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 302: 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R., 1990. Comparison of dominance curves. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 138: 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. & R. N. Gorley, 2001. PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, D. M., M. W. Luckenbach & A. J. Rodi Jr., 1993. Abundance biomass comparison (ABC method): effects of an estuarine gradient, anoxic/hypoxic events and contaminated sediments. Marine Biology 116: 507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, R. J., M. Solan & R. M. Valente, 2004. A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. Journal of Environmental Management 73: 165-181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeth, M., M. A. Pardal, A. I. Lillebø, U. Azeiteiro & J. C. Marques, 2003. Short- and long-term effects of eutrophication on the secondary production of an intertidal macrobenthic community. Marine Biology 143: 1229–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margalef, R., 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. University of Chicago Press, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. C., P. Maranhão & M. A. Pardal, 1993. Human impact on the subtidal macrobenthic community structure in the Mondego estuary (Western Portugal). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 37: 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. C., S. N. Nielsen, M. A. Pardal & S. E. Jørgensen, 2003. Impact of eutrophication and river management within a framework of ecosystem theories. Ecological Modelling 166: 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLusky, D. S., 1990. The Estuarine Ecosystem. 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molvær, J., J. Knutzen, J. Magnusson, B. Rygg, J. Skei & J. Sørensen, 1997. Classification of environmental quality in fjords and coastal waters. SFT Guidelines 97:03. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muxika, I., A. Borja & W. Bonne, 2005. The suitability of the marine biotic index (AMBI) to new impact sources along European coasts. Ecological Indicators 5: 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEAGIG Invertebrate Group, 2004. Minutes of Northeast Atlantic Geographical Intercalibration Group. Benthic Expert Meeting. Kristineberg Marine Station, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardal, M. A., P. G Cardoso, J. P. Sousa, J. C. Marques & D. Raffaelli, 2004. Assessing environmental quality: a novel approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series 267: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A., A. C. Miles, A. J. Sparrow & N. Price, 2004. Development of a classification scheme for the marine benthic invertebrate component, water framework directive. Phase I & II. Transitional and coastal waters. R & D Interim Technical Report.

  • Rodrigues, E., 2004. Variação das comunidades macrobentónicas subtidais do estuário do Mondego ao longo de mais de uma década. (Master Thesis). Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra.

  • Ros, J. D. & M. J. Cardell, 1991. La diversidad específica y otros descriptores de contaminación orgánica en comunidades bentónicas marinas. Actas del symposium sobre diversidad biológica. Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces, Madrid: 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlacher, T. A. & T. H. Wooldridge, 1996. How sieve mesh size affects sample estimates of estuarine benthic macrofauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 201: 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. & W. Weaver, 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. The University of Illinois Press, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, M., R. Dekker, K. Essink, C.-P. Günther, S. Jaklin, I. Krönke, P. B. Madsen, H. Michaelis & G. Vedel, 2003. How predictable is excellent bivalve recruitment in the Wadden Sea after a severe winter? Journal of Sea Research 49: 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. W., M. J. Riddle & J. S. Stark, 2003. Cost-efficient methods for marine pollution monitoring at Casey Station, East Antarctica: the choice of sieve mesh-size and taxonomic resolution. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46: 232–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verdelhos, T., J. M. Neto, J. C. Marques & M. A. Pardal, 2005. The effect of eutrophication abatement on the bivalve Scrobicularia plana. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 63: 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R. M., 1986. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities. Marine Biology 92: 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R. M., 1993. Environmental impact studies on marine communities: pragmatical considerations. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R. M. & K. R. Clarke, 1994. Relearning the ABC: taxonomic changes and abundance/biomass relationships in disturbed benthic communities. Marine Biology 118: 739–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Framework Directive, 2000. European Communities Official Journal L327, 2000/60/EC: 1-72.

  • Wilson, J. G. & B. Elkaïm, 1992. Estuarine bioindicators: a case for caution. Acta Oecologica 13: 345–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ysebaert, T., P. M. J. Herman, P. Meire, J. Craeymeersch, H. Verbeek & C. H. R. Heip, 2003. Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries: estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary, NW Europe. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57: 335–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, M. A., M. C. Morris & D. E. Howes, 1999. Large scale characterization of intertidal communities using a predictive model. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 239: 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study was carried out in the scope of the research project Typology and Reference Conditions for Transitional and Coastal Portuguese Waters—TICOR, funded by INAG—Instituto da Água (Portugal), and Dynamic model of stress induced changes on benthic communities—DYNAMOD (POCTI/MGS/37431/2001), funded by FCT (Portuguese National Board of Scientific Research).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IMAR - Institute of Marine Research, c/o Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, 3004-517, Portugal

    H. Teixeira, M. A. Pardal & J. C. Marques

  2. Department of Ecology and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology, University of Murcia, Murcia, 30100, Spain

    F. Salas

Authors
  1. H. Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Salas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. A. Pardal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. C. Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Teixeira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teixeira, H., Salas, F., Pardal, M.A. et al. Applicability of ecological evaluation tools in estuarine ecosystems: the case of the lower Mondego estuary (Portugal). Hydrobiologia 587, 101–112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0697-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0697-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation