Abstract
The aim of our study was to assess the water quality of the upper Moselle river by using biological indices. Simultaneous physico-chemical surveys were also undertaken from May 1999 to April 2000. Twelve sampling sites were selected in order to provide a wide range of potential pollution. Chemical analysis did not reveal any major problem of pollution. However a lower water quality resulting from domestic pollution was established for some sampling sites. A biological monitoring combining both macroinvertebrates and macrophytes was performed. Biological indices based on plant community structure and macrophyte composition were not pertinent tools, whereas simple indices based on taxonomic richness of particular groups of macroinvertebrates were strongly correlated with several chemical parameters, showing that such simple biological variables should represent powerful indicators of ecosystem degradation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AFNOR, 1992. Détermination de l’indice biologique global normalisé (IBGN). In Qualité des eaux. Méthodes d’analyse, Tome 4. AFNOR, Paris, ISBN 2-12-179020-9
A. Baattrupp-Pedersen T. Riis (1999) ArticleTitleMacrophyte diversity and composition in relation to substratum characteristics in regulated and unregulated Danish streams Freshwater Biology 42 375–385 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.444487.x
M. T. Barbour J. Gerritsen G. E. Griffith R. Frydenborg E. McCarron J. S. White M. L. Bastian (1996) ArticleTitleA framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15 185–211 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1467948
R. Carbiener M. Trémolières J. -L. Mercier A. Ortscheit (1990) ArticleTitleAquatic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of eutrophication in calcareous oligosaprobe stream waters (Upper Rhine plain, Alsace) Vegetatio 86 71–88 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00045135
Dawson, F. H., J. R. Newman, M. J. Gravelle, K. J. Rouen & P. Henville, 2000. Assessment of the trophic status of rivers using macrophytes. Evaluation of the Mean Trophic Rank. R&D Technical Report E39, Environment Agency, 178 pp
B. O. L. Demars D. M. Harper (1998) ArticleTitleThe aquatic macrophytes of an English lowland river system: assessing response to nutrient enrichment Hydrobiologia 38 75–88 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1003203512565
N. Pauw ParticleDe G. Vanhooren (1983) ArticleTitleMethod for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium Hydrobiologia 100 153–168 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00027428
F. Guérold (2000) ArticleTitleInfluence of taxonomic determination level on several community indices Water Research 34 487–492 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00165-7
Harding J. P. C. 1981. Macrophytes as monitors of river quality in the Southern N.W.W.A area, North West Water Authority, Rivers Divisions, Réf TS-BS-81-2, 54 pp
Haury, J., M. -C. Peltre, M. Trémolières, J. Barbe, G. Thiébaut, I. Bernez, H. Daniel, P. Chatenet, S. Muller, A. Dutartre, C. Laplace Treyture, A. Cazaubon & E. Lambert-Servien, 2002. Une méthode pour mettre en évidence la trophie de l’eau et la pollution organique avec les macrophytes: l’Indice Biologique Macrophyte en Rivière (IBMR) Application à différents types de rivières et de pollutions. Proceedings of the 11th International EWRS Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, Moliets-Maâ France 2002: 247–250
N. T. H. Holmes C. Newbold (1984) ArticleTitleRiver plant communities-reflectors of water and substrate chemistry Focus on Nature Conservation 9 73
R. Margalef (1958) ArticleTitleInformation theory in ecology General Systems 3 36–71
Margalef Norris R. H. & A. Georges, 1993. Analysis and interpretation of benthic macroinvertebrates surveys. In D. M. Rosenberg & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York, 234–286
V. H. Resh J. K. Jackson (1993) Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates D. M. Rosenberg V. H. Resh (Eds) Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic macroinvertebrates Chapman and Hall New York 195–233
F. Robach G. Thiébaut M. Trémolières S. Muller (1996) ArticleTitleA reference system for continental running waters: plant communities as bioindicators of increasing eutrophication in alkaline and acidic waters in North East of France Hydrobiologia 340 67–76 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXhvVegtL4%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00012736
Shannon (1963) The Mathematical Theory of Communication University Illinois Press Urbana
E. H. Simpson (1949) ArticleTitleMeasurement of diversity Nature 163 688
A. M. Small W. H. Adey S. M. Lutz E. G. Reese D. L. Roberts (1996) ArticleTitleA macrophyte based rapide biosurvey of stream water quality: restoration at the watershed scale Restoration Ecology 4 124–145 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00114.x
G. Thiébaut F Guérold S. Muller (2002) ArticleTitleAre trophic and diversity indices based on macrophyte communities pertinent tools to monitor water quality? Water Research 36 3602–3610 Occurrence Handle12230206 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00052-0
R. S. Thorne W. P. Williams (1997) ArticleTitleThe response of benthic macroinvertebrates to pollution in developping countries: a multimetric system of bioassessment Freshwater Biology 37 671–686 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00181.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thiébaut, G., Tixier, G., Guérold, F. et al. Comparison of different biological indices for the assessment of river quality: application to the upper river Moselle (France). Hydrobiologia 570, 159–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0176-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0176-2