Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pro-Environmental Behavior: Does It Matter How It’s Measured? Development and Validation of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale (PEBS)

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many empirical studies examine the performance of pro-environmental behavior. A review of 49 recent studies revealed 42 unique measures of pro-environmental behavior. Analysis of these studies indicates a lack of consistency among the various behavioral measures. To address the issue of inconsistency in such a critical variable, I developed a new measure, the Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale (PEBS). The behaviors included in this scale are those identified by environmental scientists as having the greatest impact on the environment. Principal components analysis generated a 19-item scale with four dimensions. Coefficient alpha for the full scale was .76. Coefficient alphas for the subscales ranged from .62 to .74. Bivariate Pearson correlations between the PEBS and the New Ecological Paradigm Scale, the Environment Identity Scale, and the Environmental Regulations Attitude Scale demonstrated the scale’s construct validity. Test-retest correlations were strong, demonstrating reliability of the PEBS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The 49 studies are identified by an asterisk in the reference list.

References

*Studies included in the review.

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In Beckmann, J. (ed.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 11–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *Armel, K., Yan, K., Todd, A., and Robinson, T. N. (2011). The Stanford Climate Change Behavior Survey: Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions-Related Behaviors in Individuals and Populations. Climatic Change 109(3/4): 671–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Axelrod, L. J., and Lehman, D. R. (1993). Responding to Environmental Concerns: What Factors Guide Individual Action? Journal of Environmental Psychology 13: 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Barr, S. (2007). Factors Influencing Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: A Study of Household Waste Management. Environment and Behavior 39(4): 435–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, A., O’Connor, R., Bohm, G., Hanss, D., Bodi, O., Ekstrom, F., Halder, P., Jeschke, S., and Saelensminde, I. (2012). Causal Thinking and Support for Climate Change Policies: International Survey Findings. Global Environmental Change 22: 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bratt, C. (1999). Consumers’ Environmental Behavior: Generalized, Sector-Based, or Compensatory? Environment and Behavior 31(1): 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower, M., and Leon, W. (1999). The Consumer’s Guide to Effective Environmental Choices: Practical Advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists. Three Rivers Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chao, Y., and Lam, S. (2011). Measuring Responsible Environmental Behavior: Self-Reported and Other-Reported Measures and their Differences in Testing a Behavioral Model. Environment and Behavior 43(1): 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Cottrell, S. P., and Graefe, A. R. (1997). Testing a Conceptual Framework of Responsible Environmental Behavior. Journal of Environmental Education 29(1): 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Davis, J. L., Green, J.D., and Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the Environment: Commitment, Interconnectedness, and Environmental Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(2): 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Davis, J. L., Le, B., and Coy, A. E. (2011). Building a Model of Commitment to the Natural Environment to Predict Ecological Behavior and Willingness to Sacrifice. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31: 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Dono, J., Webb, J., and Richardson, B. (2010). The Relationship Between Environmental Activism, Pro-Environmental Behavior and Social Identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30: 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (2006). Grid-Group Cultural Theory. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., and Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Esa, N. (2010). Environmental Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Student Teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 19(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Gadene, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., and Smith, T. (2011). The Influence of Consumers’ Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes on Energy Saving Behavior. Energy Policy 39: 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., and Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and Determinants of Environmentally Significant Consumer Behavior. Environment and Behavior 34: 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Holbert, R. L., Kwak, N., and Shah, D. (2003). Environmental Concern, Patterns of Television Viewing, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 47(2): 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Homburg, A., and Stolberg, A. (2006). Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior with a Cognitive Theory of Stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hunter, L., Hatch, A., and Johnson, A. (2004). Cross-National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors. Social Science Quarterly 85(3): 676–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Iwata, O. (2004). Some Psychological Correlates of Environmentally Responsible Behavior. Social Behavior and Personality 32(8): 703–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kaiser, F. G., and Gutscher, H. (2003). The Proposition of a General Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Ecological Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33(3): 586–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kaiser, F. G., and Schultz, P. W. (2009). The Attitude–Behavior Relationship: A Test of Three Models of the Moderating Role of Behavioral Difficulty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 39(1): 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kaiser, F. G. and Wilson, M. (2000). Assessing People’s General Ecological Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30: 952–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kaiser, F. G., Wolfing, S., and Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and Their Effects on Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior 28: 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Korfiatis, K., Hovardas, T., and Pantis, J. D. (2004). Determinants of Environmental Behavior in Societies in Transition: Evidence from Five European Countries. Population and Environment 25(6): 563–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lang, K. B. (2011). The Relationship between Academic Major and Environmentalism Among College Students. The Journal of Environmental Education 42(4): 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Larson, L. R., Whiting, J. W., and Green, G. T. (2011). Exploring the Influence of Outdoor Recreation Participation on Pro-Environmental Behavior in a Demographically Diverse Population. Local Environment 16(1): 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lee, J. A., and Holden, S. J. (1999). Understanding the Determinants of Environmentally Conscious Behavior. Psychology and Marketing 16(5): 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Levine, D. S., and Strube, M. J. (2012). Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, Intentions and Behaviors among College Students. The Journal of Social Psychology 52(3): 308–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Martensson, M., and Pettersson, R. (2003). Everyday life contexts and the environment. In Biel, A., et al. (eds.), Individual and Structural Determinants of Environmental Practice. Ashgate Publishing, Burlington, pp. 26–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Milfont, T. L. (2009). The Effects of Social Desirability on Self-Reported Environmental Attitudes and Ecological Behavior. Environmentalist 29: 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Milfont, T. L., and Duckitt, J. (2004). The Structure of Environmental Attitudes: A First- and Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Milfont, T. L., Duckitt, J., and Cameron, L. D. (2006). A Cross-Cultural Study of Environmental Motive Concerns and Their Implications for Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior 38(6): 745–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Mobley, C., Vagias, W. M., and DeWard, S. (2010). Exploring Additional Determinants of Environmentally Responsible Behavior. Environment and Behavior 43(4): 420–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Nisbet, E., Zelenski, J. M., and Murphy, S.A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals’ Connection with Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior. Environment and Behavior 41(5): 715–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ollie, E., Grendstad, G., and Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of Environmental Behaviors: Bringing Back Social Context. Environment and Behavior 33(2):181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Oreg, S., and Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting Pro-Environmental Behavior Cross-Nationally: Values, the Theory of Planned Behavior, and Value-Belief Norm Theory. Environment and Behavior 38(4): 462–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual. Open University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K., Green-Demers, I., Noels, K., and Beaton, A. M. (1998). Why are You Doing Things for the Environment?: The Motivation Toward the Environment Scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28(5): 437–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Pfeffer, M., and Stycos, J. M. (2002). Immigrant Environmental Behaviors in New York City. Social Science Quarterly 83(1): 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Poortinga, W., Steg, L., and Vlek, C. (2004). Values, Environmental Concern and Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior 36(1): 70–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, T. W., Bostrom, A., Read, D., and Morgan, M. G. (2010). Now What Do People Know about Global Climate Change?: Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople. Risk Analysis 30: 1520–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Scannell, L., and Gifford, R. (2010). The Relations Between Natural and Civic Place Attachment and Pro-Environmental Behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(3): 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., and Franek, M. (2005). Values and Their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology 36(4): 457–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Steel, B. S. (1996). Thinking Globally and Acting Locally?: Environmental Attitudes, Behavior, and Activism. Journal of Environmental Management 47(1): 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., van Vuuren, D., den Elzen, M. G., Eickhout, B., and Kabat, P. (2009). Climate Benefits of Changing Diet. Climatic Change 95: 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., and Gardner, G. T. (1981). Psychological Research and Energy Policy. American Psychologist 36: 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., and Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In Altman, I., and Stokols, D. (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology. Wiley, New York, pp. 1043–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., and Guagnanao, G. A. (1995). The New Environmental Paradigm in Social Psychological Perspective. Environment and Behavior 27: 723–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Ruttan, V. W., Socolow, R. H., and Sweeney, J. L. (1997). Strategies for setting research priorities. In Stern, P. (ed.), Environmentally Significant Consumption: Research Directions. National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 124–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Able, T., Guagnanao, G. A., and Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements. Human Ecology Review 6: 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Stets, J. E., and Biga, C. F. (2003). Bringing Identity Theory into Environmental Sociology. Sociological Theory 21(4): 398–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Thapa, B. (2010). The Mediation Effect of Outdoor Recreation Participation on Environmental Attitude-Behavior Correspondence. The Journal of Environmental Education 41: 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Thogersen, J. (2006). Norms for Environmentally Responsible Behavior: An Extended Taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26: 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R., and Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H., and Seigrist, M. (2012). Addressing Climate Change: Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Act and to Support Policy Measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32: 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liere, K., and Dunlap, R. E. (1981). Environmental Concern: Does it Make a Difference How It’s Measured? Environment and Behavior 13(6): 651–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Walton, T., and Austin, D. M. (2011). Pro-Environmental Behavior in an Urban Social Structural Context. Sociological Spectrum 31: 260–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigert, A. J. (1997). Self, Interaction, and Natural Environment. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioral Responses to Climate Change: Asymmetry of Intentions and Impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(1): 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Whitmarsh, L., and O’Neill, S. (2010). Green Identity, Green Living? The Role of Pro-Environmental Identity in Determining Consistency across Diverse Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(3): 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P., and Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA

    Gail L. Markle

Authors
  1. Gail L. Markle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail L. Markle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markle, G.L. Pro-Environmental Behavior: Does It Matter How It’s Measured? Development and Validation of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Scale (PEBS). Hum Ecol 41, 905–914 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9614-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9614-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation