Skip to main content
Log in

“With the Stroke of a Pen”: Designation of the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument and the Impact on Trust

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In September of 1996, without prior warning to Utah residents, the Clinton Administration announced the creation of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM) in southern Utah. Reactions by residents in neighboring gateway communities were both swift and intense. Lack of citizen input in the process drew ire among Utah citizens living near the monument and statewide. In this article we examine how the designation process has impacted residents’ trust in the federal agency managing the monument—the Bureau of Land Management. Research on trust in federal resource management agencies is important for successful natural resource planning and management. We extend the research by incorporating the manner in which the designation of the GSENM occurred as an additional factor in the analyses on trust. We find the manner of designation matters, and discuss implications of this finding for both research and policy makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although Arizona and Colorado considered similar legislation in 2012, Utah was alone in passing it into law. In Arizona the bill passed the House and Senate, but Arizona governor Jan Brewer vetoed the bill. The bill failed in the Colorado legislature.

  2. For a complete history of the public lands which became GSENM see Belco and Rottinghaus (2009).

  3. Given only one respondent self-identified as Native American, we were unable to conduct specific analyses on Native American reactions to the GSENM designation.

  4. Demographics for our sample differ from the Census estimates as anticipated, given our selection of individuals who had lived in Escalante in 1996 and 2006. 2010 US Census data indicate a median age of 45 years for Escalante. The 2005–2009 American Community survey estimates indicate 53 % males and 47 % females in Escalante. Most residents have some college (51 % of men and 64 % of women) (U.S. Census Bureau 2012). The 1996 sample closely resembled Census estimates.

  5. Both component and overall model fit statistics from CFA support this measure. Detailed results available upon request.

References

  • Allison, P. (2002). Missing Data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. R. (2010). Community Psychology, Political Efficacy, and Trust. Political Psychology 31: 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In Marcoulides, G. A., and Schumacker, R. E. (eds.), Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp. 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J. (1994). A Pragmatic View of Thematic Analysis: The Qualitative Report 2(1). http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html. Accessed 1 July 2009.

  • Backus, P. (2011). 10 Years after Upper Missouri River Breaks Designation, Political Wrangling Hidden in Solitude of Sandstone Cliffs. http://missoulian.com/lifestyles/territory/article_add273f2-f122-11e0-a268-001cc4c002e0.html Accessed 1 August 2012.

  • Baird, J. (2005). Babbitt Stands by Creation of Staircase. Salt Lake Tribune. C1&C4. (October11, 2005).

  • Belco, M., and Rottinghaus, B. (2009). Presidential Proclamation 6920: Using Executive Power to Set a New Direction for the Management of National Monuments. Presidential Studies Quarterly 39: 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R. (2003). Wandering boundaries and illegal residents. The political ecology of protected area deforestation in South Sumatra Indonesia from 1979 to 1992. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-First Century. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., and Lipscombe, N. (1999). New National Park Neighbours: A Study of Perceived Lifestyle Changes. Parks and Leisure 2: 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugger, J. (2007). "The Other" and "The Enemy": Reflections on Fieldwork in Utah. North American Dialogue. 10: 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A. S., and Mattor, K. M. (2006). Why Won’t They Come? Stakeholder Perspectives on Collaborative National Forest Planning by Participation Level. Environmental Management 38: 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crispin, J. E., Downen, J. C., Perlich, P. S., and Wood, J. A. (2008). An Analysis of Long-Term Economic Growth in Southwestern Utah: Past and Future Conditions. Garfield County Profile. Bureau of Economic and Business Research. The University of Utah. June 2008.

  • Davenport, M. A., Leahy, J. E., Anderson, D. H., and Jakes, P. J. (2007). Building Trust in Natural Resource Management Within Local Communities: A Case Study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environmental Management 39: 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, M. (2009). Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict Between Global Conservation and Native Peoples. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frentz, I. E., Voth, D. E., Burns, S., and Sperry, C. W. (2000). Forest Service-Community Relationship Building: Recommendations. Society and Natural Resources 13: 549–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershtenson, J., Ladewig, J., and Plane, D. L. (2006). Parties, Institutional Control, and Trust in Government. Social Science Quarterly 87: 882–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Management Plan. (1999). http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/ut/grand_staircase-escalante/planning/monument_management.Par.83655.File.dat/GSENM%20Management%20Plan.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2012.

  • Haenn, N. (1999). The Power of Environmental Knowledge: Ethnoecology and Environmental Conflicts in Mexican Conservation. Human Ecology 27: 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J., and Theiss-Morse, E. (2001). Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be. The American Political Science Review 95: 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, J., and Janowitz, M. (1974). Community Attachment in Mass Society. American Sociological Review 39: 328–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krannich, R. S., and Smith, M. D. (1998). Local Perceptions of Public Lands Natural Resource Management in the Rural West: Toward Improved Understanding of the “Revolt in the West”. Society and Natural Resources 11: 677–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle, P. R., and McCool, S. F. (2011). The Role of Trust in Community Wildland Fire Protection Planning. Society and Natural Resources 25: 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larmer, P. (1996). A Bold Stroke: Clinton Takes a 1.7 Million-Acre Stand in Utah. High Country News 28(18).http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Articles?article_id=2795 Accessed 20 November 2011.

  • Leahy, J. E., and Anderson, D. H. (2008). Trust Factors in Community-Water Resource Management Agency Relationships. Landscape and Urban Planning 87: 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshy, J. D. (2001). The Babbitt Legacy at the Department of the Interior: A Preliminary View. Lewis & Clark School Environmental Law 31: 199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, B. (2012). “Grazing Plan? Those are Fighting Words”. Salt Lake Tribune, June 26, 2012:B1–B2.

  • McCool, D. (2001). Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument: Lessons for a Public Lands Peace Process in Utah. Journal of Land, Resources, & Environmental Law 21: 613–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez-Contreras, J. I., Dickinson, F., and Castillo-Burguete, T. (2008). Community Member Viewpoints on the Ría Celestún Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico: Suggestions for Improving the Community/Natural Protected Area Relationship. Human Ecology 36: 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, C. S., and Shindler, B. A. (2010). Trust, Acceptance, and Citizen-Agency Interactions After Large Fires: Influence on Planning Processes. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19: 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrzelka, P., Krannich, R. S., and Brehm, J. (2006). Identification with Resource-Based Occupations and Desire for Tourism: Are the Two Necessarily Inconsistent? Society and Natural Resources 19: 693–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Projections for Utah’s Cities and Unincorporated Areas. (1997). Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget, Salt Lake City.

  • Press Release. (2011). Bishop, Chaffetz, Hatch, Lee Introduce Bill to Protect Utah from Presidential Monument Designations. http://www.lee.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=cb082493-7628-4a25-906b-3cc73349343c. Accessed 6 June 2012.

  • Rasband, J. R. (2001). Moving Forward: The Future of the Antiquities Act. Journal of Land, Resources, & Environmental Law 21: 619–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E. R. (1965). Federal Park Policy in Utah: The Escalante National Monument Controversy of 1935–1940. Utah Historical Quarterly 33: 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Righter, R. W. (1982). Crucible for Conservation: The Struggle for Grand Teton National Park. Grand Teton Natural History Association, Moose, WY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shindler, B., and Toman, E. (2003). Fuel Reduction Strategies in Forest Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis of Public Support. Journal of Forestry September: 8–15.

  • Shindler, B., Gordon, R., Brunson, M. W., and Olsen, C. (2011). Public Perceptions of Sagebrush Ecosystem Management in the Great Basin. Rangeland Ecology & Management 64: 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J., Bourke, L., Luloff, A. E., Liao, P., Theodori, G. L., and Krannich, R. S. (2001). The Drop-off/Pick-Up Method for Household Survey Research. Journal of the Community Development Society 32: 238–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, S. R. (2008). Finding Common Ground: Moral Values and Cultural Identity in Early Conflict Over the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Journal of Land, Resources, and Environmental Law 28: 331–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. (2012). “American Fact Finder for Escalante, Utah.” Accessed 21 June2012 http://factfinder.census.gov.

  • US Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management. (2012). http://www.blm.gov/ut/st/en/fo/grand_staircase-escalante.html. Accessed 3 August 3, 2012.

  • van Kooten, G. C., Thomsen, R., Hobby, T. G., and Eagle, A. J. (2006). Social Dilemmas and Public Range Management in Nevada. Ecological Economics 57: 709–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veranich, P. (1996). The Propriety of President Bill Clinton’s Establishment of the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument. Evirons 20: 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank you to the residents of Escalante, who graciously gave their time and thoughts for this study. In addition, thank you to Rick Krannich and Dale Blahna for providing the 1996 survey data, Alyssia Angus , Emily and Jim Goodwin, Brian Jennings, Becca Smith, Stephanie Malin and Emily Petrzelka for their research assistance. We also thank the Agricultural Experiment Station at Utah State University, which funded this research through project UTA00850.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peggy Petrzelka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrzelka, P., Marquart-Pyatt, S. “With the Stroke of a Pen”: Designation of the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument and the Impact on Trust. Hum Ecol 41, 285–297 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9544-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9544-x

Keywords

Navigation