Skip to main content
Log in

Piaroa Manioc Varietals: Hyperdiversity or Social Currency?

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maintenance of exceptionally high numbers of folk varieties by the Piaroa people of the Venezuelan Amazon is considered. We cataloged 113 manioc folk varieties, their nomenclature, use and relevant characters, revealing significant insights into the role of manioc in Piaroa social life. Through a qualitative investigation of the cultivation, processing and symbolic significance of manioc (Manihot esculenta) in two Piaroa regions over a period of 18 years, we have found that such agrobiodiversity can only be fully explained by a combination of multiple factors, including pragmatic and ecological considerations, the subtle and complex diversity of Piaroa manioc preparations and a variety of sociocultural factors, such as manioc’s role as a mediator of social relationships and as a marker of cultural and social heritage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to Piaroa folk botanical taxonomy, manioc is classified as a monotype life from category (isaw h \(\widetilde{e}\)), which is to say it is the only member of its class at the life form rank.

  2. In the midst of this period of uncertainty, both authors applied separately for research permits to collect plant samples in the late 1990s but were unable to obtain them.

  3. The major fluvial regions occupied by the Piaroa in Venezuela include: Suapure, Parguaza, Cataniapo, Cuao, Autana, Sipapo, midddle-upper Orinoco, lower-middle Ventuari, and Manapiare.

  4. We are aware that the total inventory of culturally recognized varieties cannot be extrapolated on the basis of population numbers alone, especially given the lack of representative sampling design. But the magnitude of hypothetical increase should take into account the size and variability of the population (>12,000 in 190 communities), the diversity of the environment inhabited (savanna, lowland forest, upland forest; blackwater, clearwater, whitewater basins; seasonal and a seasonal pluvial conditions), and the considerable degree of interethnic contact and interaction.

  5. The nucleation of families and the removal from the home of men for wage labor and older children for education is placing a considerably higher childcare burden on adult women (Heckler 2002).

  6. For methods and more on this study see Zent and Heckler 2004.

References

  • Belaunde, L. (2001). Viviendo bien: género y fertilidad entre los Airo-Pai de la Amazonía Peruana. CAAAP, Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. (1984a). Inferring decision making from preferences and behavior: an analysis of Aguaruna Jívaro manioc selection. Human Ecology 12(4): 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. (1984b). Classification, cultivation, and selection of aguaruna cultivars of Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae). Advances in Economic Botany 1: 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. (1986). Exchange of varieties and information between aguaruna manioc cultivators. American Anthropologist 88: 428–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, H. (2001). Exploring Agrodiversity. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. B. (1992). Ethnoecology, biodiversity and modernization in andean potato agriculture. Journal of Ethnobiology 12(2): 161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro, R. (1983). The cultivation of manioc among the Kuikuru of the Upper Xingu. In Hames, R. B., and Vickers, W. T. (eds.), Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Academic, New York, pp. 65–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernela, J. (1986). Os Cultivares de Mandioca na Área do Uaupés (Tukâno). In Ribeiro, D. (ed.), Suma Etnológica Brasileira. Edição atualizada do Handbook of South American Indians. 1 Etnobiologia. Finep, Petrópolis, pp. 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernela, J. (1993). The Wanano Indians of the Brazilian Amazon: a sense of space. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, P. (1994). In the Society of Nature: A native ecology in Amazonia. University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. (1988). Cyanide Content of Cassava (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae) Cultivars Used by Tukanoan Indians in Northwest Amazonia. Economic Botany 42(2): 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. (1993). The Bitter is Sweet: a case study of bitter cassava (Manihot esculenta) use in Amazonia. In Hladick, C. M., Hladik, A., Pagezy, H., Linares, O. F., Koppert, G. J. A., and Froment, A. (eds.), Tropical Forests, People and Food. UNESCO, Paris, pp. 575–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, M., Rival, L., and McKey, D. (2000). Perception and Management of Cassava (Manihot exculenta Crantz.) Diversity among Makushi Amerindians of Guyana (South America). Journal of Ethnobiology 20(2): 239–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emperaire, L., Pinton, F., and Second, G. (1998). Une gestion dynamique de la diversité variétale du manioc en Amazonie du Nord-Ouest. Nature, Science et Société 6: 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frechione, J. (1982). Manioc monozoning in Yekuana agriculture. Antropológica 58: 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, G., and Zent, S. (2007). Los Piaroa. In Freire, G., and Magris, M. (eds.), El Estado de la salud indígena en Venezuela. Coordinación Intercultural de Salud de los Pueblos Indígenas (CISPI), Caracas. Ministerio de Salud y Desarrollo Social.

  • Gow, P. (1991). Of mixed blood: kinship and history in Peruvian Amazonia. Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenand, F. (1993). Bitter manioc in the lowlands of Tropical America: from myth to commercialization. In Hladik, C. M., Hladik, A., Linares, O. F., Pagezy, H., Semple, A., and Hadley, M. (eds.), Tropical Forests and Food: Biocultural Interactions and Applicationsto Development. UNESCO and Parthenon, Paris, pp. 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guss, D. (1989). To weave and sing: art, symbol and narrative in the South American rain forest. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. B. (1983). Monoculture, polyculture, and polyvariety in tropical forest Swidden Cultivation. Human Ecology 11(1): 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckler, S. (2002). Traditional knowledge loss and gender among the Piaroa. In Stepp, J. R., Wyndham, F., and Zarger, R. (eds.), Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity. Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress of Ethnobiology. International Society of Ethnobiology, Athens, pp. 532–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckler, S. (2004). Tedium and creativity: the valorization of manioc cultivation and Piaroa women. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10(2): 243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugh-Jones, C. (1979). From the Milk River: spatial and temporal processes in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. (2003). Families of the Forest: the Matsigenka Indians of the Peruvian Amazon. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kensinger, K. M. (1975). Studying the Cashinahua. In Dwyer, J. (ed.), The Cashinahua of Eastern Peru. Studies in Anthropology and Material Culture, 1. The Haffenreffer Museum of Anthropology, Brown University, Providence, pp. 9–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krute, L. (1989) Piaroa Nominal Morphosemantics. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, p. 322.

  • Mauss, M. (1990[1925]). The Gift. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, C. (2001). Gender and Sociality in Amazonia: How real people are made. Oxford, Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKey, D., and Beckerman, S. (1993). Chemical ecology, plant evolution and traditional manioc cultivation systems. In Hladick, C. M., Hladik, A., Pagezy, H., Linares, O. F., Koppert, G. J. A., and Froment, A. (eds.), Tropical Forests, People and Food. UNESCO, Paris, pp. 83–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. (1970). Los Piaroa y lo Invisible: ejercicio preliminar a un estudio sobre la religión Piaroa. Boletín Informativo de Antropología 7: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowat, L. (1989). Cassava and Chicha: bread and beer of the Amazonian Indians. Shire Ethnography, Aylesbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCEI (1995). Censo Indígena de Venezuela 1992 Vol. I, Republica de Venezuela, Oficina Central de Estadistica e Informatica, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, P. (1996). The Impacts of Development and Indigenous Responses among the Piaroa of the Venezuelan Amazon, Ph.D. thesis, London School of Economics, University of London.

  • Overing, J. (1992). Wandering in the market and the forest: an Amazonian theory of production and exchange. In Dilley, R. (ed.), Contesting Markets: Analyses of Ideology, Discourse and Practice. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 180–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overing, J. (2003). In Praise of the Everyday: Trust and the art of social living. Ethnos 68(3): 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overing, J., and Kaplan, M. (1988). Los Wothuha (Piaroa). In Koppens, W. (ed.), Los aborigenes de Venezuela: etnología contemporánea II. Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Instituto Caribe de Antroplogoía y Sociología, Caracas, pp. 307–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overing, J., and Passes, A. (2000). Introduction: conviviality and the opening up of Amazonian anthropology. In Overing, J., and Passes, A. (eds.), The Anthropology of love and anger: the aesthetics of conviviality in Native Amazonia. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overing-Kaplan, J. (1975). The Piaroa: A people of the Orinoco Basin: A study in kinship and marriage. Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno, D., and Pearsall, D. (1998). The Origins of Agriculture in the Lowland Neotropics. Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rival, L. (2001). Seed and clone: the symbolic and social significance of bitter manioc cultivation. In Rival, L., and Whitehead, N. (eds.), Beyond the visible and the material: the Amerindianization of society in the work of Peter Rivière. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière, P. (1987). Of women, men and manioc. In Skar, H., and Salomon, F. (eds.), Natives and Neighbours in South America. Ethnographic Museum, Gothenburg, pp. 178–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salick, J., Cellinese, N., and Knapp, S. (1997). Indigenous diversity of cassava: generation, maintenance, use and loss among the Amuesah, Peruvian Upper Amazon. Economic Botany 51(1): 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwerin, K. (1970). Apuntes sobre la yuca y sus origenes. Boletin Informativo de Antropología 7: 23–27. Asociación Venezolana de Sociología, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskind, J. (1973). Tropical forest hunters and the economy of sex. In Gross, D. (ed.), People and cultures of Native South America. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (2002). Soils Used for Gardens by Tukanoans in Northwestern Amazonia and their Impact on Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Cultivar Selection. Culture and Agriculture 24(2): 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (2003). Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), cyanogenic potential and predation in Northwestern Amazonia: the Tukanoan Perspective. Human Ecology 31: 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. M., and Dufour, D. L. (2002). Why “bitter” cassava? Productivity of “bitter” and “sweet” cassava in a Tukanoan Indian settlement in the Northwest Amazon. Economic Botany 56(1): 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W., and Dufuor, D. (2006). Ethnobotanical evidence for cultivar selection among the Tukanoans: Manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in the Northwest Amazon. Culture and Agriculture 28(2): 122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zent, S. (1992). Historical and Ethnographic Ecology of the Upper Cuao River Wõthĩhã: Clues for an Interpretation of Native Guianese Social Organization. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent, S., and Heckler, S. (2004). The Diversity and Dynamics of Cassava Cultivation among the Piaroa of the Venezuelan Amazon. Paper presented in the panel “Traditional environmental knowledge and change.” 9th International Congress of Ethnobiology, University of Kent, Canterbury, U. K. June 13–17, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serena Heckler.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Manioc varieties identified in Upper Cuao and Manapiare Valley Piaroa communities

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heckler, S., Zent, S. Piaroa Manioc Varietals: Hyperdiversity or Social Currency?. Hum Ecol 36, 679–697 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9193-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9193-2

Keywords

Navigation