Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Amazon Forestry Tranformed: Integrating Knowledge for Smallholder Timber Managemet in Eastern Brazil

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 November 2007

Abstract

Recent discussions of local knowledge emphasize its dynamic nature invoking local peoples’ ability to effectively integrate traditional or local with science-based or “modern” knowledges. The smallholder timber industry of the Amazon’s estuarine floodplain provides an outstanding example of local patterns of resource management and economic activities transformed from within by smallholder farmers who participated in the industrial timber boom of the 1970s and 1980s. These farmers of eastern Amazonia have developed a vertically integrated local industry based on expertise reflecting profound locally developed knowledge of specific forests and management of ecological processes, individual observation and experimentation, as well as concepts and practices derived from temporary employment by large-scale industrial timber firms. At each stage of the smallholder forestry process—from managing natural regeneration to running small sawmills and marketing lumber—local managers apply an innovative set of practices reflecting their diverse experiences. This combination of technical, market, and ecological knowledge results in forests, timber markets, and economic patterns that do not correspond to many of the widely-held generalizations concerning either local or industrial tropical timber exploitation. This article uses data from 7 years of research in the Amazon floodplain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The research methods and detailed results from that field research are presented in Pinedo-Vasquez et al. (2001), in Human Ecology 29:2 (219–239).

  2. Fictitious names are used here.

References

  • Agrawal, A. (1999). On power and indigenous knowledge. In Posey, D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, UNEP, Nairobi, pp. 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2005). Community, Intimate Government, and the Making of Environmental Subjects in Kumaon, India. Current Anthropology 46: 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexiades, M. (1999). Ethnobotany of the Ese Eja: Plants, Health, and Change in an Amazonian Society. Plant Science. City University of New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A. M. S. (2004). Technological Change in Agriculture and Land Degradation in Bangladesh: A Case Study. Land Degradation & Development 15: 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (1992). Land-use strategies for successful extractive economies in Amazonia. In Nepstad, D. C., and Schwartzman, S. (eds.), Non-timber Products from Tropical Forests: Evaluation of a Conservation and Development Strategy, The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp. 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler, C. (2004). Local knowledge theory and methods: an urban model from Indonesia. In Bicker, A., Sillitoe, P., and Pottier, J. (eds.), Investigating Local Knowledge: New Directions, New Approaches, Ashgate, Aldershot, England, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., and Webb, P. (2001). Income diversification and livelihoods in rural Africa: cause and consequence of change. Food Policy 26.

  • Barros, A. C., and Uhl, C. (1995). Logging Along the Amazon River and Estuary: Patterns, Problems and Potential. Forest Ecology and Management 77: 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benad, A., and Lupanga, I. J. (1991). Reaching the farmers: the role of local knowledge systems for the introduction of agricultural innovations in Tanzania. In DuPré, G. (ed.), Savoirs paysans et développement / Farming Knowledge and Development, Editions Karthala; Editions de l’ORSTOM, Paris, pp. 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J., Boa, E., Vilca, P., and Stonehouse, J. (2004). Triangulation with técnicos: A method for rapid assessment of local knowledge. In Bicker, A., Sillitoe, P., Pottier, J. (eds), Investigating Local Knowledge: New Directions, New Approaches, Ashgate, Aldershot, England, pp. 89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (2002). The Changing Role of Non-Farm Activities in Agricultural Households in Indonesia: Some Insights from the Agricultural Censuses. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 38: 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brondízio, E., Moran, E., Mausel, P., and Wu, Y. (1994). Land Use Change in the Amazon Estuary: Patterns of Caboclo Settlement and Landscape Management. Human Ecology 22: 249–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E. S. (1999). Agroforestry intensification in the Amazon estuary. In Granfelt, T. (ed.), Managing the Globalized Environment: Local Strategies to Secure Livelihoods, IT, London, pp. 88–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio, E. S., Safar, C., and Siqueira, A. D. (2002). The Urban Market of Açaí Fruit (Euterpe Oleracea Mart.) and Rural Land Use Change: Ethnographic Insights into the Role of Price and Land Tenure Constraining Agricultural Choices in the Amazon Estuary. Urban Ecosystems 6: 67–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson, D. F. (1996). Deagrarianization and Rural Employment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Sectoral Perspective. World Development 24: 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson, D. F. (1999). African Rural Labour, Income Diversification and Livelihood Approaches: A Long-Term Development Perspective. Review of African Political Economy 80: 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho Netto, R. A., Pereira, B. G., Noda, H., and Boherm, B. (2004). Murcha bacteriana no Estado do Amazonas, Brasil. Fitopatologia Brasileira 29: 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, A. (1999). Livelihoods and Poverty: The Role of Migration—A Critical Review of the Migration Literature. Journal of Development Studies 36: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt, B. R. (1994). Using Indigenous Knowledge to Improve Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. Human Organization 53: 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte-Gardner, O., Young, F. L., and Dillman, D. A. (2004). Increasing the Effectiveness of Technology Transfer for Conservation Cropping Systems Through Research and Field Design. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19: 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., Franks, J. R., and Alvarado Claudio, M. (1998). Adoption of Modern Agricultural Technologies by Lowland Indigenous Groups in Bolivia: The Role of Households, Villages, Ethnicity, and Markets. Human Ecology 26: 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, L. (1996). Economic Mobility Strategies Among Guatemalan Peasants: Prospects and Limits of Nontraditional Vegetable Cash Crops. Human Organization 55: 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaud, D. (1991). L’emprunt technique dans l’agriculture de l’Aribinda, Burkina-Faso. In DuPré, G. (ed.), Savoirs paysans et développement / Farming Knowledge and Development, Editions Karthala; Editions de l’ORSTOM, Paris, pp. 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (1998). Postcolonial Developments, Duke University Press, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanyani-Mlambo, B. T., and Hebinck, P. (1996). Formal and Informal Knowledge Networks in Conservation Forestry in Zimbabwe. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 4.

  • Harms, R. (1991). The decline of diversity: specialization in fishing technology along the Middle Zaire. In DuPré, G. (ed.), Savoirs paysans et développement / Farming Knowledge and Development, Editions Karthala; Editions de l’ORSTOM, Paris, pp. 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S., and Cockburn, A. (1989). The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers and Defenders of the Amazon, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiraoka, M. (1992). Caboclo and Ribereno Resource Management In Amazonia: A Review. In Redford, K., and Padoch, C. (eds.), Conservation of Neotropical Forests: Working from Traditional Resource Use, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. G. (1996). Farmers as Workers in Japan’s Regional Economic Restructuring, 1965–1985. Economic Geography 72.

  • McGrath, K. P. (1955). Possibilities of Timber Industrial Development in the Amazon Valley. Tropical Woods 101: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meert, H., Huylenbroeck, G. V., Vernimmen, T., Bourgeois, M., and Hecke, E. van (2005). Farm Household Survival Strategies and Diversifcation on Marginal Farms. Journal of Rural Studies 21: 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, M. (1996). Transnational Labor and Refugee Enclaves in a Central American Banana Industry. Human Organization 55: 425–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepstad, D. C., Veríssimo, A., Alencar, A., Nobre, C., Lima, E., Lefebvre, P., Schlesinger, P., Potterk, C., Moutinho, P., Mendoza, E., Cochrane, M., and Brooks, V. (1999). Large Scale Impoverishment of Amazonian Forests by Logging and Fire. Nature 398: 505–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., and De Jong, W. (1989). Production and profit in agroforestry: an example from the Peruvian Amazon. In Browder, J. O. (ed.), Fragile Lands of Latin America: Strategies for Sustainable Development, Westview, Boulder, pp. 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., and de Jong, W. (1990). Santa Rosa: The Impact of the Forest Products Trade on an Amazonian Place and Population, Advances in Economic Botany 8: 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., and de Jong, W. (1992). Diversity, variation, and change in ribereño agriculture. In Redford, K., and Padoch, C. (eds.), Conservation of Neotropical Forests: Working from Traditional Resource Use, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., and de Jong, W. (1995). Subsistence- and market-oriented agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon. In Nishizawa, T., and Uitto, J. I. (eds.), The Fragile Tropics of Latin America: Sustainable Management of Changing Environments, United Nations University Press, New York, pp. 226–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., and Pinedo-Vasquez, M. (2006). Concurrent activities and invisible technologies: an example of timber management in Amazonia. In Posey, D. A. (ed.), Human Impacts on the Amazon: The Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Conservation and Development, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinchón, F. J. (1996). Land-Use Strategies in the Amazon Frontier: Farm-Level Evidence from Ecuador, Human Organization 55: 416–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo-Vasquez, M. (1995). Human Impact on Varzea Ecosystems in the Napo-Amazon, Peru. Yale University, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Barletti Pasqualle, J., del Castillo Torres, D., and Coffey, K. (2002). A Tradition of Change: The Dynamic Relationship Between Biodiversity and Society in Sector Muyuy, Peru. Environmental Science & Policy 5: 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo-Vasquez, M., and Rabelo, F. (2002). Sustainable management of an Amazonian forest for timber production: a myth or reality? In Brookfield, H., Padoch, C., Parsons, H., and Stocking, M. (eds.), Cultivating Biodiversity: Understanding, Analyzing, and Using Agricultural Diversity, United Nations University, London, pp. 186–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Zarin, D., Coffey, K., Padoch, C., and Rabelo, F. (2001). Post-Boom Timber Production in Amazonia, Human Ecology 29: 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1993). Cultivation: knowledge or performance? In Hobart, M. (ed.), Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance, Routledge, London, pp. 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgely, A.-M., and Brush, S. B. (1992). Social Factors and Selective Technology Adoption: The Case of Integrated Pest Management, Human Organization 51: 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. (2001). Designing Agricultural Technology for African Women Farmers: Lessons From 25 years of Experience, World Development 21: 2075–2092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T. (1993). Tropical Deforestation: Small Farmers and Land Clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T., Perez-Lugo, M., and Zichal, H. (2000). When Fields Revert to Forest: Development and Spontaneous Reforestation in Post-War Puerto Rico. The Professional Geographer 52: 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., and Thompson, J. (eds.) (1994). Beyond Farmer First, Intermediate Technology, London.

  • Sears, R. R., and Pinedo-Vasquez, M. (2004). Axing the trees, growing the forest: smallholder timber production on the Amazon Varzea. In Zarin, D. J., Alavalapatti, J. R. R., Putz, F. E., and Schmink, M. (eds.), Working Forests in the Neotropics: Conservation Through Sustainable Management? Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 258–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebers, H. (2003). Management of Knowledge and Social Transformations: A Case Study from Guatemala. Development and Local Knowledge: New Approaches to Issues in Natural Resource Management, Conservation and Agriculture, Routledge, New York, pp. 31–50

  • Sillitoe, P., and Barr, J. (2004). A decision model for the incorporation of indigenous knowledge into development projects. In A. Bicker, Sillitoe, P., and Pottier, J. (eds.), Investigating Local Knowledge: New Directions, New Approaches, Ashgate, Aldershot, England, pp. 59–88.

  • Smith, N. J. H. (1995). Amazonia: Resiliency and Dynamism of the Land and its People, United Nations University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffen, M., Mortimore, M., and Gichuki, F. (1994). More People, Less Erosion: Environmental Recovery in Kenya, J. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, H. J. (1991). Western science and Andean technology. In DuPré, G. (ed.), Savoirs Paysans Et Développement/Farming Knowledge and Development. Editions Karthala; Editions de l’ORSTOM, Paris, pp. 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. H., Thorne, P. J., Sinclair, F. L., Thapa, B., Wood, C. D., and Subba, D. B. (1999). A Systems Approach to Comparing Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge: Consistency and Discriminatory Power of Indigenous and Laboratory Assessment of the Nutritive Value of Tree Fodder. Agricultural Systems 62: 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, B. (1983). The Amazon Rubber Boom, 1850–1920, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, G. C. (1989). Transferring traditional technology: a bottom-up approach for fragile lands. In Browder, J. O. (ed.), Fragile Lands of Latin America: Strategies for Sustainable Development. Westview, Boulder, CO, pp. 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Rozelle, S., and Huang, J. (2001). Off-Farm Jobs and On-Farm Work in Periods of Boom and Bust in Rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics 29: 505–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An early version of this paper was presented simultaneously at the “Innovative Wisdom: the Contribution of Local Knowledge to Science, Conservation and Development” workshop, Rome, Italy, and the International Society for Ethnobiology, Atlanta, Georgia, October 2000. The authors would like to thank Gary Martin and Carol Colfer for comments on earlier drafts of the paper, which also benefited from comments at the two meetings, and three anonymous reviewers. This material is based upon work supported by the Overbrook Foundation, the National Science Foundation under Grants BCS-0203488 and BCS-0527578, the Land Insitute, Kansas, USA, and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) support to the PLEC program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Padoch.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9150-5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sears, R.R., Padoch, C. & Pinedo-Vasquez, M. Amazon Forestry Tranformed: Integrating Knowledge for Smallholder Timber Managemet in Eastern Brazil. Hum Ecol 35, 697–707 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9109-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9109-y

Key words

Navigation