Abstract
Resurgent protectionists advocate a return to strict nature protection characterized by excluding most people from ecologically fragile areas. Certain groups of indigenous residents, namely those with low population densities, simple technologies, and subsistence economies, are seen as conservation friendly, but groups who are experiencing demographic growth, using Western technologies, and producing for the market are perceived as incompatible with biodiversity conservation. Using insights from common property theory as well as ethnographic observations of the Huaorani Indians of Ecuador, I illustrate how such assumptions constitute a “conservation Catch-22” in which cultural conditions deemed compatible with biodiversity conservation are precisely those from which we would not predict conservationist practices to emerge. Romanticized conditions deemed harmonious with nature lack the incentives necessary for people to develop conservationist practices. Conservation is not a state of being, but a social process inextricably linked to social and political institutions influencing resource management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, A. (2002). Common resources and institutional sustainability. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 41–86.
Alcorn, J. B. (1993). Indigenous peoples and conservation. Conservation Biology 7: 424–426.
Alvard, M. S. (1993). Testing the “ecologically noble savage” hypothesis: Interspecific prey choice by Piro hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology 21: 355–387.
Alvard, M. (1995). Intraspecific prey choice by Amazonian hunters. Current Anthropology 36(5): 789–818.
Berkes, F., Feeny, D. McCay, B. J., and Acheson, J. M. (1989). The benefits of the commons. Science 340: 91–93.
Brandon, K., Redford, K. H., and Sanderson, S. E. (1998). Parks in Peril: People, Politics, and Protected Areas, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Bromley, D. W., and Cernea, M. M. (1989). The management of common property natural resources: Some conceptual and operational fallacies. World Bank Discussion Papers No. 57, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Brosius, J. P. (1997). Endangered forest, endangered people: Environmentalist representations of indigenous knowledge. Human Ecology 25: 47–69.
Colchester, M. (2000). Self-determination or environmental determinism for indigenous peoples in tropical forest conservation. Conservation Biology 14(5): 1365–1367.
Ellingson, T. (2001). The Myth of the Noble Savage, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Hames, R. (1987). Game conservation or efficient hunting? In McCay, B. J., and Acheson, J. M. (eds.), The Question of the Commons, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 92–107.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1, 243–248.
Heller, J. (1961). Catch-22, Simon & Schuster, New York.
Holt, F. L., Bilsborrow, R. E., and Oña, A. I. (2004). Demography, Household Economics, and Land and Resource Use of Five Indigenous Populations in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon: A Summary of Ethnographic Research. Occasional Paper, Carolina Population Center. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
Kane, J. (1996). Savages, Random House, London.
Kimerling, J. (1993). Crudo Amazónico, Abya Yala, Quito.
Kramer, R. A., and van Schaik, C. P. (1997). Preservation paradigms and tropical rain forests. In Kramer, R. A., van Schaik, C. P., and Johnson, J. (eds.), Last Stand: Protected Areas and the Defense of Tropical Biodiversity, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–14.
Kramer, R. A., van Schaik, C. P., and Johnson, J. (1997). Last Stand: Protected Areas and the Defense of Tropical Biodiversity, Oxford University Press, New York.
Lu, F. E. (1999). Changes in Subsistence Patterns and Resource Use of the Huaorani Indians in the Ecuadorian Amazon, PhD Dissertation, Curriculum in Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Lu, F. E. (2001). The common property regime of the Huaorani Indians of Ecuador: Implications and challenges to conservation. Human Ecology 29: 425–447.
McCay, B. J. (2002). Emergence of institutions for the commons: Contexts, situations, and events. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.) The Drama of the Commons, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 361–402.
McCay, B. J., and Acheson, J. M. (1987). The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
McKean, M. A. (1996). Common property: What is it good for, and what makes it work? Forests, Trees and People Programme, Phase II Working Papers. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Oates, J. F. (1999). Myth and Reality in the Rain Forest: How Conservation Strategies are Failing in West Africa, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (2002). The Drama of the Commons, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Pichón, F., and Bilsborrow, R. E. (1992). Land-use systems, deforestation and associated demographic factors in the humid tropics: Farm-level evidence from Ecuador. Paper prepared for the IUSSP Seminar on Population and Deforestation in the Humid Tropics, Campinas, Brazil, November 30–December 3, 1992.
Redford, K. H. (1991). The ecologically noble savage. Cultural Survival Quarterly 15: 46–48.
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. (1976). Cosmology as ecological analysis: A view from the rain forest. Man (N.S.) 11: 307–318.
Rival, L. M. (1992). Social Transformations and the Impact of Formal Schooling on the Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador, PhD Dissertation, London School of Economics, University of London, London.
Rival, L. M. (1998). The Social Life of Trees: Anthropological Perspectives on Tree Symbolism, Berg Publishers, Oxford, UK.
Rival, L. M. (2002). Trekking through History: The Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador, Columbia University Press, New York.
Terborgh, J. (1999). Requiem for Nature, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Vickers, W. T. (1994). From opportunism to nascent conservation. Human Nature 5: 307–337.
Walker, C. (1996). Film Trinkets and Beads. First Run Icarus Films. Brooklyn, NY, 52 minutes.
Wilshusen, P. R., Brechin, S. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (2002). Reinventing a square wheel: Critique of a resurgent “protection paradigm” in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources 15: 17–40.
Yost, J. A. (1981). Twenty years of contact: The mechanisms of change in Wao (“Auca”) culture. In Whitten, N. E. (ed.), Cultural Transformation and Ethnicity in Modern Ecuador, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 677–704.
Yost, J. A. (1991). People of the forest: The Waorani. In Acosta-Solis, M. (ed.), Ecuador in the Shadow of Volcanoes, Ediciones Libri Mundi, Quito, pp. 95–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holt, F.L. The Catch-22 of Conservation: Indigenous Peoples, Biologists, and Cultural Change. Hum Ecol 33, 199–215 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-005-2432-X
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-005-2432-X