Abstract
Between 1917 and 1945, the Ecological Society of America (ESA) housed a Committee for the Preservation of Natural Conditions specifically charged with identifying and taking political action toward the preservation of wilderness sites for scientific study. While several historians have analyzed the social and political contexts of the Preservation Committee, none has addressed the scientific context that gave rise to the Committee and to political activism by ESA members. Among the Preservation Committee’s lobbying efforts, the naming of Glacier Bay, Alaska, as a national monument in 1925 stands out as a unique success. I argue that the campaign for the preservation of Glacier Bay reveals the methodological ambitions ecologists had for their science in the 1920s and 1930s and demonstrates how ecologists understood the role of place in biological field studies. It represented preservation for science. Most of the political activities undertaken by the ESA in the interwar years, however, turned out to be science for conservation, which rarely involved lobbying for the protection of active research sites. In conjunction with changes in ecological methodology in the 1940s, the Committee’s unclear scientific mission contributed to its being disbanded in 1945.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bocking, Stephen. 1997. Ecologists and Environmental Politics: A History of Contemporary Ecology. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cittadino, Eugene. 1993. “A ‘Marvelous Cosmopolitan Preserve’: The Dunes, Chicago, and the Dynamic Ecology of Henry Cowles.” Perspectives on Science 1: 520–559.
Clements, Frederic E. 1905. Research Methods in Ecology. Lincoln, NB: The University of Nebraska Publishing Company.
Clements, Frederic E. 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Cohen, Michael P. 1988. The History of the Sierra Club 1892–1970. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books. Also available online at http://www.sierraclub.org/history/origins.
Coker, R.E. 1938. “Functions of an Ecological Society.” Science 87: 309–315.
Coleman, David C. 2010. Big Ecology: The Emergence of Ecosystem Science. Berkley: The University of California Press.
Cooper, William Skinner. 1923. “The Recent Ecological History of Glacier Bay, Alaska” Ecology 4: 93–128, 223–246, 355–365.
Cowles, Henry Chandler. 1901. “Physiographic Ecology of Chicago and Vicinity: A Study of Origin, Development, and Classification of Plant Societies.” Botanical Gazette 31: 73–108, 145–182.
Croker, Robert A. 1991. Pioneer Ecologist: The Life and Work of Victor Ernest Shelford, 1877–1968. Washington: Smithsonian University Press.
Ecological Society of America. 1922. Preservation of Natural Conditions. Springfield, IL: Schnepp & Barnes, Printers.
Engel, J. Ronald. 1983. Sacred Sands: The Struggle for Community in the Indiana Dunes. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Field, William O. 2004. With a Camera in My Hands: William O. Field, Pioneer Glaciologist: A Life History as Told to C Suzanne Brown. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.
Hagen, Joel. 1992. An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Hays, Samuel. 1959. Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ilerbaig, Juan. 1999. “Allied Sciences and Fundamental Problems: C.C. Adams and the Search for Method in Early American Ecology.” Journal of the History of Biology 32: 439–463.
Ilerbaig, Juan. 2002. Pride in Place, Fieldwork, Geography, and American Field Zoology, 1880–1920. PhD Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Kinchy, Abby J. 2006. “On the Borders of Post-War Ecology: Struggles Over the Ecological Society of America’s Preservation Committee, 1917–1946.” Science as Culture 15: 23–44.
Kohler, Robert E. 2002. Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Livingstone, David N. 2003. Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Milner, Alexander M. and Robertson, Anne L. 2010. “Colonization and Succession of Stream Communities in Glacier Bay, Alaska; What has it Contributed to General Successional Theory?” River Research and Applications 26: 26–35.
Mitchell, Rodger, Mayer, Ramona A. and Downhower, Jerry. 1976. “An Evaluation of Three Biome Programs.” Science 192: 859–865.
Mitman, Gregg. 1992. State of Nature: Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mitman, Gregg. 2003. “Hay Fever Holiday: Health, Leisure and Place in Gilded-Age America.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 77: 600–635.
Moore, Barrington. 1925. “The Importance of Natural Conditions in National Parks.” G.B. Grinnell and C. Sheldon (eds.), Hunting and Conservation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 340–355
Nash, Roderick. 2001. Wilderness and the American Mind, 4th ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Pearson, G.A. 1922. “Preservation of Natural Areas in the National Forests.” Ecology 3: 284–287.
Pound, Roscoe and Clements, Frederic E. 1898. “A Method of Determining the Abundance of Secondary Species.” Minnesota Botanical Studies 2: 19–24.
Redfield, A. C. 1947. “To the Ecological Society of America.” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 28: 16–18
Rumore, Gina Maria. 2009. A Natural Laboratory, A National Monument: Carving out a Place for Science in Glacier Bay, Alaska, 1879–1959. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Runte, Alfred. 1997. National Parks: The American Experience, 3rd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Sellars, Richard West. 1997. Preserving Nature in the Natural Parks. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shelford, Victor E. 1918. “Committee for Preservation of Natural Condition.” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 2: 1
Shelford, Victor E. 1933. “Conservation Versus Preservation.” Science 77: 535.
Smith, Michael L. 1987. Pacific Visions: California Scientists and the Environment, 1850–1915. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tarr, Rolph Stockman and Martin, Lawrence. 1914. Alaskan Glacier Studies. Washington, DC: The National Geographic Society.
Tjossem, Sara Fairbank. 1994. Preservation of Nature and Academic Respectability: Tensions in the Ecological Society of America, 1915–1979. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.
Tobey, Ronald. 1981. Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding School of American Plant Ecology, 1895–1955. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Turner, Frederick. 1986 [1893]. The Frontier in American History. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Van Hise, C.R. 1902. “The Training and Work of a Geologist.” Science 16: 321–334.
Warren, Julianne Lutz. 2008. “Science, Recreation, and Leopold’s Quest for a Durable Scale.” Michael P. Nelson and J. Baird Callicott (eds.), The Wilderness Debate Rages On. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, pp. 97–118.
Waterman, W.G. 1926. “Proceedings: Business Meetings of the Ecological Society of America at Kansas City, Missouri.” Ecology 7: 235–246
Waterman, W.G. 1929. “Proceedings: Business Meetings of the Ecological Society of America at New York City, New York, 1928.” Ecology 10: 259–267
Weiner, Douglas. 1988. Models of Nature: Ecology, Conservation, and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Worster, Donald. 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rumore, G. Preservation for Science: The Ecological Society of America and the Campaign for Glacier Bay National Monument. J Hist Biol 45, 613–650 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9301-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9301-9