Abstract
Oval cells are liver-specific bipotent stem cells which accumulate in injured liver when proliferation of mature hepatocytes and/or cholangiocytes is impaired. They represent an intermediary cell type with phenotypical characteristics of both, hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. Oval cells express specific cell surface proteins allowing their identification in situ. Most of these cell surface proteins, however, are recognized by antibodies in mouse liver tissue that are not commercially available or work only on frozen sections. We show herein the unequivocal identification of oval cells in paraffin-embedded mouse liver samples based on strong E-cadherin expression different from that of hepatocytes and bile duct cells. By comparing the pattern of E-cadherin expression with that of both, A6-antigen and CD44, we suggest a tight control of E-cadherin expression depending on the differentiation stage of the progenitor cells. In human cirrhotic liver samples E-cadherin expression was found as a common feature of both, typical and atypical reactions, and, thus, can also serve as an indication of the progenitor cell compartment activation.
References
Akhurst B, Matthews V, Husk K et al (2005) Differential lymphotoxin-beta and interferon gamma signaling during mouse liver regeneration induced by chronic and acute injury. Hepatology 41:327–335
Alison MR, Vig P, Russo F et al (2004) Hepatic stem cells: from inside and outside the liver? Cell Prolif 37:1–21
Braun KM, Thompson AW, Sandgren EP (2003) Hepatic microenvironment affects oval cell localization in albumin-urokinase-type plasminogen activator transgenic mice. Am J Pathol 162:195–202
Butz S, Larue L (1995) Expression of Catenins during mouse embryonic development and in adult tissues. Cell Adhesion and Communication 3:337–352
Engelhardt NV, Factor VM, Yasova AK et al (1990) Common antigens of mouse oval and biliary epithelial cells. Expression on newly formed hepatocytes. Differentiation 45:29–37
Evarts RP, Nagy P, Nakatsukasa H et al (1989) In vivo differentiation of rat liver oval cells into hepatocytes. Cancer Res 49:1541–1547
Farber E (1956) Similarities in the sequence of early histological changes induced in the liver of the rat ethionine, 2-acetylaminofluorene, and 3′-methyl-4-dimethylaminoazobenzene. Cancer Res 16:142–148
Fabris L, Strazzabosco M, Crosby HA et al (2000) Characterization and isolation of ductular cells coexpressing neural cell adhesion molecule and Bcl-2 from primary cholangiopathies and ductal plate malformations. Am J Pathol 156:1599–1612
Fausto N (2004) Liver regeneration and repair: hepatocytes, progenitor cells, and stem cells. Hepatology 39:1477–1487
Fiorino AS, Diehl AM, Lin HZ et al (1998) Maturation-dependent gene expression in a conditionally transformed liver progenitor cell line. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34:247–258
Fujio K, Evarts RP, Hu Z et al (1994) Expression of stem cell factor and its receptor, c-kit, during liver regeneration from putative stem cells in adult rat. Lab Invest 70:511–516
Gumbiner BM (1996) Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84:345–357
Hermiston ML, Wong MH, Gordon JI (1996) Forced expression of E-cadherin in the mouse intestinal epithelium slows cell migration and provides evidence for nonautonomous regulation of cell fate in a self-renewing system. Genes Dev 10:985–996
Koenig S, Probst I, Becker H et al (2006) Zonal hierarchy of differentiation markers and nestin expression during oval cell mediated rat liver regeneration. Histochem Cell Biol 126:723–734
Kofman AV, Morgan G, Kirschenbaum A et al (2005) Dose- and time-dependent oval cell reaction in acetaminophen-induced murine liver injury. Hepatology 41:1252–1261
Kon J, Ooe H, Oshima H et al (2006) Expression of CD44 in rat hepatic progenitor cells. J Hepatol 45:90–98
Li WL, Su J, Yao YC et al (2006) Isolation and characterization of bipotent liver progenitor cells from adult mouse. Stem Cells 24:322–332
Lim R, Knight B, Patel K et al (2006) Antiproliferative effects of interferon alpha on hepatic progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo. Hepatology 43:1074–1083
Nagy P, Bisgaard HC, Thorgeirsson S (1994) Expression of hepatic transcription factors during liver development and oval cell differentiation. J Cell Biol 126:223–233
Newsome PN, Hussain MA, Theise ND (2004) Hepatic oval cells: helping redefine a paradigm in stem cell biology. Curr Top Dev Biol 61:1–28
Omori N, Omori M, Evarts RP et al (1997) Partial cloning of rat CD34 cDNA and expression during stem cell-dependent liver regeneration in the adult rat. Hepatology 26:720–727
Overturf K, Al-Dhalimy M, Ou CN et al (1997) Serial transplantation reveals the stem-cell-like regenerative potential of adult mouse hepatocytes. Am J Pathol 151:1273–1280
Perez-Moreno M, Jamora C, Fuchs E (2003) Sticky business: orchestrating cellular signals at adherens junctions. Cell 112:535–548
Rhim JA, Sandgren EP, Degen JL et al (1994) Replacement of diseased mouse liver by hepatic cell transplantation. Science 263:1149–1152
Roskams T, Yang SQ, Koteish A et al (2003) Oxidative stress and oval cell accumulation in mice and humans with alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Pathol 163:1301–1311
Roskams T (2006) Different types of liver progenitor cells and their niches. J Hepatol 45:1–4
Tee LBG, Kirilak Y, Huang W-H et al (1994) Differentiation of oval cells into duct-like cells in preneoplastic liver of rats placed on a choline-deficient diet supplemented with ethionine. Carcinogenesis 15:2747–2756
Sell S (1998) Comparison of liver progenitor cells in human atypical reactions with those seen in experimental models of liver injury. Hepatology 27:317–331
Sirica AE (1995) Ductular hepatocytes. Histol Histopathol 10:433–456
Tatematsu M, Ho RH, Kaku T et al (1984) Studies on the proliferation and fate of oval cells in the liver of rats treated with 2-acetylaminofluorene and partial hepatectomy. Am J Pathol 114:418–430
Ueberham E, Arendt E, Starke M et al (2004) Reduction and expansion of the glutamine synthetase expressing zone in livers from tetracycline controlled TGF-β1 transgenic mice and multiple starved mice. J Hepatol 41:75–81
Vestweber D, Kemler R (1984) Some structural and functional aspects of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin. Cell Differ 15:269–273
Yovchev MI, Grozdanov PN, Joseph B et al (2007) Novel hepatic progenitor cell surface markers in the adult rat liver. Hepatology 45:139–149
Acknowledgment
We thank Natalya Engelhardt (Kolzow Institute, Moscow) for generously providing of A6 antibody and Sarah Koenig for providing of rat liver sections of the AAF/PH model for oval cell activation. The authors thank Martina Fügenschuh, Institute of Pathology, University of Leipzig for embedding tissue and Doris Mahn for preparing the mouse liver sections. We thank Jens Grosche, IZKF, University of Leipzig, for performing Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. The work was supported by the Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research at the Medical Faculty of the University of Leipzig (01KS9504, projects C01 and D07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ueberham, E., Aigner, T., Ueberham, U. et al. E-cadherin as a reliable cell surface marker for the identification of liver specific stem cells. J Mol Hist 38, 359–368 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10735-007-9098-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10735-007-9098-1