Abstract
Student expectations of required workload, behaviour, resource use, role and relationship profoundly shape success in higher education and inform satisfaction with their learning experience. Teachers’ expectations of students’ behaviour can similarly affect the university learning experience and environment. When expectations between academic staff and students are not aligned, student satisfaction and staff morale are likely to suffer. This study sought to identify areas where the academic expectations of students and staff aligned or diverged and understand responses to any breaches of expectations. Here, we report on qualitative findings from a survey of 259 undergraduate students and 48 staff members and focus group interviews with 10 students and 15 staff members. Although their academic expectations aligned in most areas, students appeared to have broader conceptions of success at university than staff, and a stronger focus on the importance of personal relationships with staff and teaching quality. Academics expressed stronger injunctive norms about prioritisation of study and the importance of identifying as a student. These differences are likely to lead to tension between the two groups, particularly in areas of value for individuals. While clarifying expectations may improve alignment between the groups to some extent, the basis of these differences in individual priorities suggests that merely articulating expectations may not resolve the issue. We therefore argue for staff to adopt a co-creation approach to academic expectations and to ‘meet students halfway’ where possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appleton-Knapp, S. L., & Krentler, K. A. (2006). Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: the importance of managing student expectations. Journal of marketing education, 28(3), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475306293359.
Baik, C., Larcombe, W., Brooker, A., Wyn, J., Allen, L., Brett, M., et al. (2017). Enhancing mental wellbeing: a handbook for academic educators. Melbourne: Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2015). The first year experience in Australian universities: finding from two decades, 1994–2014. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of personality and social psychology, 47(6), 1191.
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students. Studies in higher education, 44(11), 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788.
Brinkworth, R., McCann, B., Matthews, C., & Nordström, K. (2009). First year expectations and experiences: student and teacher perspectives. Higher Education, 58(2), 157–173.
Cheng, M., Taylor, J., Williams, J., & Tong, K. (2016). Student satisfaction and perceptions of quality: testing the linkages for PhD students. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1153–1166.
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). San Diego: Academic Press Inc.
Collier, P. J., & Morgan, D. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?”: differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55(4), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5.
Dabos, G. E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 52.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 109–132.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1995). Social categorization and group homogeneity: changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01054.x.
Hassel, S., & Ridout, N. (2018). An investigation of first-year students’ and lecturers’ expectations of university education. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02218.
McFarlane Shore, L., & Tetrick, L. E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 91–109). New York: John Wiley.
Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: a model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.
Naylor, R. (2017). First year student conceptions of success: What really matters? Student Success, 8, 9+.
Naylor, R., & Mifsud, N. (2019). Towards a structural inequality framework for student retention and success. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–14,. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1670143.
Nicholson, L., Putwain, D., Connors, L., & Hornby-Atkinson, P. (2013). The key to successful achievement as an undergraduate student: confidence and realistic expectations? Studies in higher education, 38(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.585710.
Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: a study of psychological contracts. Journal of organizational behavior, 11(5), 389–400.
Schalk, R., & Roe, R. E. (2007). Towards a dynamic model of the psychological contract. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 37(2), 167–182.
Social Research Centre. (2019). 2018 Student experience survey national report. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
Stok, F. M., & de Ridder, D. T. (2019). The focus theory of normative conduct. In K. Sassenberg & M. Vliek (Eds.), Social Psychology in Action (pp. 95–110). Cham: Springer.
Troiano, H., & Elias, M. (2014). University access and after: explaining the social composition of degree programmes and the contrasting expectations of students. Higher Education, 67(5), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9670-4.
Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Beyond hard outcomes: ‘soft’outcomes and engagement as student success. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 661–673.
Funding
This work was supported by a Scholarship of Learning and Teaching Grant from La Trobe University and funding from the School of Life Sciences and Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naylor, R., Bird, F.L. & Butler, N. Academic expectations among university students and staff: addressing the role of psychological contracts and social norms. High Educ 82, 847–863 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00668-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00668-2