Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parental background and university dropout in Italy

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using longitudinal data drawn from the European Community Household Panel, this paper examines Italian university entry and dropout rates in the context of specific parental and family characteristics. We are interested in the effects of the household’s cultural and financial conditions on shaping investment in tertiary education and its failure, at the national level. Our estimates confirm the persistence of intergenerational correlations related to education. Cultural constraints affect outcomes—enrolment in and withdrawal from tertiary education; low income negatively affects the transition from high school to college. Our results suggest that a comprehensive policy intervention is needed to ensure optimal human capital investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ISTAT (2000).

  2. Pre 1969, access to university was allowed to only individuals holding an academic-oriented secondary school qualification (i.e. licei). Individuals holding technical and professional high school diploma have only been allowed to enrol for a university degree course since the introduction of law n.910/69.

  3. In 2000, university survival rates were lowest in Italy (42 %) compared to an OECD average of 70 % (70 % for Germany, 59 % for France and 83 % for the UK).

  4. Italian subsidies for education to private entities as a percentage of GDP were of 0.15 in 2000, while the OECD mean was 0.24 % (OECD 2003).

  5. For a comprehensive description of the Italian tertiary education system after the introduction of the 2001 reform, see Bratti et al. (2008) and Bratti et al. (2010).

  6. It should be noted that family income in this study refers to resources available at the time of transitions rather than parental income during the child’s late adolescent years. It has been shown that children in financially well off families during their formative years have greater exposure to higher quality education and experience environments that foster cognitive and non-cognitive skills (Carneiro and Heckman 2002).

  7. These authors show that undergraduates with good final high school grades are more likely to dropout.

  8. The ECHP survey was discontinued after 2001.

  9. In this manner, we control for the resources available given family characteristics.

  10. In ECHP, data individuals are already identified by grouping some regions—it includes 11 geographical areas.

  11. Average unemployment rates during the sample period were about 6.6 % in the north-west, 5.3 % in the north-east, 7.6 % in central Italy and 16 % in the south.

  12. Under the assumption of ‘proportional hazard’, the duration profile of the hazard is the only function of the time variable and, therefore, is the same for all individuals where the profile is shifted upwards or downwards by the explanatory variables.

  13. ‘Rho’ is the ratio of the heterogeneity variance to 1 plus the heterogeneity variance.

  14. The highest percentage of university enrolment after high school completion is also due to the specific Italian situation, where there is a limited differentiation in higher education programmes. The situation changed slightly after the introduction of the new university reform ‘3 + 2’, which also encouraged enrolment by individuals with less time to devote to study, such as workers and older individuals.

  15. For example in the academic year 1998–1999, according to geographical macro-area of residence, freshmen were about 19.64 % from the north-western, 15.37 % from the north-eastern, 20.83 % from the centre and 44.16 % from the southern Italy.

  16. The estimation results correspond to the model without unobserved heterogeneity as the hypothesis that rho is zero cannot be rejected (i.e. frailty is unimportant).

References

  • Ahlburg, D. A., McCall, B. P., Na, I. (2002). Time to dropout from college: A hazard model with endogenous waiting. Working Paper No. 0102, Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota.

  • Arulampalam, W., Naylor, R. A., & Smith, J. P. (2004a). A hazard model of the probability of medical school drop-out in the UK. Journal of Royal Statistics Society A, 167, 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arulampalam, W., Naylor, R. A., & Smith, J. P. (2004b). Factors affecting the probability of first year medical student dropout in the UK: A logistic analysis for the intake of cohorts of 1980–92. Medical Education, 38, 492–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arulampalam, W., Naylor, R. A., & Smith, J. P. (2005). Effects of in-class variation and student rank on the probability of withdrawal: Cross-section and time-series analysis for UK university students. Economics of Education Review, 24(3), 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arulampalam, W., Naylor, R. A., & Smith, J. P. (2007). Dropping out of Medical School in the UK: Explaining the changes over ten years. Medical Education, 41, 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O., & Ham, J. (1979). Education, unemployment, and earnings. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a casual model of student attrition. Journal of Research in Higher Education, 12, 155–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of non-traditional undergraduate student attrition. Journal of Review of Education Research, 55, 485–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. (2001). Why don’t Italians finish university?. European University Institute (unpublished manuscript).

  • Becker, G. S., & Chiswick, B. R. (1966). Education and the distribution of earnings. American Economic Review, 56(2), 358–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloc, F., Maruotti, A., & Petrella, L. (2010). University drop-out: An Italian experience. Higher Education, 60, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanden, J., & Machin, S. (2004). Educational inequality and the expansion of UK higher education. The Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(2), 230–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, A., & Shavit, Y. (1993). Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boero, G., Laureti, T., & Naylor, R. (2005). An econometric analysis of student withdrawal and progression in post reform Italian universities, Working Paper 2005–04—CRENOS.

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). The inheritance of inequality. Journal of Economic Perspective, 16, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratti, M. (2001). Labour force participation and marital fertility of Italian women: The role of education. Journal of Population Economics, 16(3), 525–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratti, M., Broccolini, C., & Staffolani, S. (2010). Higher education reform, student’s time allocation and academic performance in Italy: Evidence from a Faculty Of Economics. Rivista di Politica Economica, n.2, 275–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratti, M., Checchi, D., & De Blasio, G. (2008). Does the expansion of higher education increase the equality of educational opportunities? Evidence from Italy. Labour, 22(s1), 53–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunello, G., & Cappellari, L. (2008). The labour market effects of Alma Mater: Evidence from Italy. Economics of Education Review, 27(5), 564–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy, 22(52), 781–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunello, G., Comi, S., & Lucifora, C. (1999). Returns to education in Italy: A review of the applied literature, in returns to human capital in Europe. A literature review. Helsinki: ETLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappellari, L., & Lucifora, C. (2008). The “Bologna Process” and college enrollment decisions. Labour Economics, 16(6), 638–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, chapter 30, pp. 1801–1863.

  • Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1992) Does school quality matter: Returns to education and the characteristics of public schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy 100, l–40.

  • Carneiro, P., & Heckman, J. J. (2002). The evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. The Economic Journal, 112(3), 705–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checchi, D. (2000). University education in Italy. International Journal of Manpower, 21(3), 177–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checchi, D., Fiorio, C.V., Leonardi, M. (2008). Intergenerational persistence in educational attainment in Italy. IZA Discussion Paper 3622.

  • Checchi, D, Flabbi, L. (2006). Intergenerational mobility and schooling decisions In Italy and Germany. IZA Discussion Paper 2876.

  • Checchi, D., Franzoni, F., Ichino, A., & Rustichini, A. (2000). College choice and academic performance. Department of Economics, University of Milan Italy (unpublished manuscript).

  • Checchi, D., Ichino, A., & Rustichini, A. (1999). More equal but less mobile? Education financing and intergenerational mobility in Italy and the US. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 351–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingano, F. & Cipollone, F. (2007). University drop-out. The case of Italy, Temi di discussione, Banca d’Italia.

  • Di Pietro, G. (2004). The Determinants of University Dropout in Italy: a Bivariate Probability Model with Sample Selection. Applied Economics Letters, 11(3), 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Pietro, G. (2006). Regional labour market conditions and university dropout rates. Evidence from Italy. Regional Studies, 40(6), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondazione RUI & Università di Camerino. (2002). Euro Student 2000: Indagine sulle condizioni di vita e di studio degli studenti universitari in Italia, Rome.

  • Galindo-Rueda, F., & Vignoles, A. (2005). The declining relative importance of ability in predicting educational attainment. Journal of Human Resources, 40(2), 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., & Mulligan, C. B. (2001). Human capital, heterogeneity and estimated degrees of intergenerational mobility. The Economic Journal, 111, 207–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E., & Wößmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116, C63–C76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1995). The determinants of children’s attainments: A review of methods and findings. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 1829–1878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heineck, G., & Riphahn, R. T. (2009). Intergenerational transmission of educational attainment in Germany—The last five decades. Journal of Economics and Statistics, 229(1), 36–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT. (1998). Università e lavoro: statistiche per orientarsi, Roma.

  • ISTAT. (2000). Università e lavoro: statistiche per orientarsi, Roma.

  • ISTAT. (2010). Indice dei prezzi per le rivalutazioni monetarie, Roma.

  • Jenkins, S. P. (2004). Survival analysis, institute for social and economic research. University of Essex. (unpublished manuscript).

  • Johnes, G., & McNabb, R. (2004). Never give up on the good times: Student attrition in the UK. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66, 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochner, L. (2004). Education, work, and crime: A human capital approach. International Economic Review, 45(3), 811–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meara, E. R., Richards, S., & Cutler, D. M. (2008). The gap gets bigger: Changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981–2000. Health Affairs, 27(2), 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montmarquette, C., Mahseredjian, S., & Houle, R. (2001). The determinants of university dropouts: A bivariate probability model with sample selection. Economics of Education Review, 20(5), 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.

  • Smith, J., & Naylor, R. (2001). Determinants of degree performance in UK universities: A statistical analysis of the 1993 student cohort. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63(1), 29–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: Toward an empirical synthesis of the recent research. Journal of Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topel, R. (2005). The private and social values of education. Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, pp. 47–57.

  • Triventi, M., & Trivellato, P. (2009). Participation, performance and inequality in Italian higher education in the 20th century. Evidence from the Italian Longitudinal Household Survey. Higher Education, 57, 681–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER—University of Essex) for the data. Individual thanks for useful comments are due to Lorenzo Cappellari, Giorgia Casalone, Mark Bryan, Marco Francesconi, David Haardt, Stephen Jenkins and Cheti Nicoletti and to two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Aina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aina, C. Parental background and university dropout in Italy. High Educ 65, 437–456 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9554-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9554-z

Keywords

Navigation