Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of South Korea’s Brain Korea 21 (BK 21) project, a special research funding program designed to build world-class research university. The effects were measured by examining the frequency of article publications in SCI journals during the 1995–2005 period. The results of the analysis indicated that the growth of research publications from Korean research universities was increased significantly following the implementation of the BK 21 project in 1999. In addition, during the period under study, four research universities (Yonsei, Korea, Sungkyunkwan, and Hanyang) were newly emerged. However, the growth rate of research publications was not different from that of the US and Japan, and even less than that of China. Thus, although the BK 21 project contributed to the growth of research publications of Korean universities, the project did not lessen the gap between Korea universities and world-class research universities in the US or Japan in number of publications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altbach, P. G. (2007). Peripheries and centers: Research universities in developing countries. In P. G. Altbach & J. Balán (Eds.), World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America (pp. 1–28). Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Baik, I., & Park, K. (2007). A study on the effect of the first-step BK21 project on research achievements of universities. The Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 25(4), 435–454.
Balán, J. (2007). Higher education policy and the research university: In Asia and Latin America. In P. G. Altbach & J. Balán (Eds.), World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America (pp. 286–312). Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bentley, R., & Blackburn, R. (1990). Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage. Research in Higher Education, 31(4), 327–353.
Berk, R. A., & de Leeuw, J. (1999). An evaluation of California’s inmate classification system using a generalized regression discontinuity design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1045–1052. doi:10.2307/2669918.
Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36, 694–707. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
Dolan, R. C., & Schmidt, R. M. (1994). Modeling institutional production of higher education. Economics of Education Review, 13(3), 197–213. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(94)90008-6.
Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631. doi:10.1023/A:1018705823763.
Gander, J. P. (1999). Faculty gender effects on academic research and teaching. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 171–184. doi:10.1023/A:1018782513285.
Gladieux, L. E., King, J. E., & Corrigan, M. E. (2004). The federal government and higher education. In P. G. Altbach, R. O. Berdahl, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (2nd ed., pp. 163–197). Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Goldfarb, B. (2008). The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, 37, 41–58. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.011.
Hser, Y. I., Shen, H., Chou, C. P., Messer, S. C., & Anglin, M. D. (2001). Analytic approaches for assessing long-term treatment effects: Examples of empirical applications and findings. Evaluation Review, 25(2), 233–262.
Jordan, J. M., Meador, M., & Walters, S. J. K. (1988). Effects of department size and organization on the research productivity of academic economists. Economics of Education Review, 7(2), 251–255. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(88)90049-0.
Jürgen, S. (2006). Germany’s excellence initiative: A model for Europe? Circulation, 114, f114–f115.
King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. doi:10.1038/430311a.
Korean Ministry of Education & Human Resource Development. (2005). The 2nd master plan of national human resource development. Seoul, South Korea: Author.
Korean Ministry of Education & Human Resource Development. (2006). White paper of the Brain Korea 21. Seoul, South Korea: Author.
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. doi:10.1177/0306312705052359.
Lesik, S. A. (2006). Do developmental mathematics programs have a causal impact on students retention? An application of discrete-time survival and regression-discontinuity analysis. Research in Higher Education, 48(5), 583–608. doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9036-1.
Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617–630. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0231-1.
Ma, W. (2007). The “flagship” university and China’s economic reform. In P. G. Altbach & J. Balán (Eds.), World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America (pp. 31–53). Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Marcantonio, R. J., & Cook, T. D. (1994). Convincing quasi-experiments: The interrupted time series and regression-discontinuity designs. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 133–154). San Francisco: Jassey-Bass Publisher.
Moon, M., & Kim, K. (2001). A case of Korean higher education reform: The Brain Korea 21 Project. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2(2), 96–105.
Patrick, W. J., & Stanley, E. C. (1998). Teaching and research quality indicators and the shaping of higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(1), 19–41. doi:10.1023/A:1018700327881.
Porter, S. R., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2006). Institutional research productivity and the connection to average student quality and overall reputation. Economics of Education Review, 25, 605–617. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.06.003.
Ramsden, P. (1999). Predicting institutional research performance from published indicators: A test of a classification of Australian university types. Higher Education, 37, 341–358. doi:10.1023/A:1003692220956.
Rey, J., Martín, M. J., Plaza, L., Ibábáñez, J. J., & Méndez, I. (1998). Changes on publishing behavior in response to research policy guidelines: The case of the Spanish research council in the field of agronomy. Scientometrics, 41(1–2), 101–111. doi:10.1007/BF02457971.
Shin, J. (2009). Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach. Higher Education, 57, 247–266. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9150-4.
Toutkoushian, R. K., Porter, S. R., Danielson, C., & Hollis, R. R. (2003). Using publications counts to measure an institution’s research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 121–148. doi:10.1023/A:1022070227966.
Yonezawa, A. (2007). Japanese flagship universities at a crossroads. Higher Education, 54, 483–499. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9028-2.
Acknowledgments
I wish thanks to my graduate students Jisun Jung and Eunkyung Park for their help in data collection. This research was supported by a grant from Seoul National University in 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, J.C. Building world-class research university: The Brain Korea 21 project. High Educ 58, 669–688 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9219-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9219-8