Abstract
This paper posits a classification of tertiary education institutions into four tiers: world research universities, selecting universities, recruiting universities, and vocational institutes. The distinguishing characteristic of world research universities is their research strength, the distinguishing characteristic of selecting universities is their strong student demand, the distinguishing characteristic of recruiting universities is their lower student demand, and the distinguishing characteristic of vocational institutes is their predominance of vocational programs. Yet there is one general characteristic that underlies the whole classification: positional value. The classification is put within a theoretical framework which generates tests of the classification proposed in the paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Association of American Universities. (2008) About AAU. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.aau.edu/.
Bleiklie, I. (2005). Organizing higher education in a knowledge society. Higher Education, 49, 31–59. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-2913-7.
Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education and cultural change (pp. 71–112). London: Willmer Brothers Limited.
Brooks, R. L. (2005). Measuring university quality. Review of Higher Education, 29, 1–21. doi:10.1353/rhe.2005.0061.
Cameron, K. S. (1981). Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 25–47. doi:10.2307/255822.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2007). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Accessed 5 July 2008, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/.
Center for Science & Technology Studies. (2007). Bibliography of the competence center for scientometrics. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.cest.ch/en/scientometrie/studies.htm.
Cyrenne, P., & Grant, H. (2008). University decision making and prestige: An empirical study. Economics of Education Review. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.06.001.
Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD). (2008). CHE university ranking. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.daad.de/deutschland/hochschulen/hochschulranking/06543.en.html.
Federkeil, G. (2002). Some aspects of ranking methodology—the CHE-ranking of German universities. Higher Education in Europe, XXVII(4), 389–397. doi:10.1080/0379772022000071878.
Gautherin, J. (1993). Marc-Antoine Jullien (‘Jullien de Paris’) (1775–1848). Prospects: The quarterly review of comparative education, XXIII(3/4), 757–773. Accessed 23 Dec 2007 from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications/ThinkersPdf/julliene.PDF.
Group of Eight. (2008) Group of Eight. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.go8.edu.au/.
Grubb, N. W. (2005). Alternatives to universities revisited, Chap. 1. Education Policy Analysis, 2004, 15–46.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.
Hermanowicz, J. C. (2005). Classifying universities and their departments: A social world perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(1), 26–55. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0005.
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in higher education. Society for research into higher education. Bury St Edmunds: St Edmundbury Press. Cited in Stanley and Reynolds (1994).
Jullien, M. (1817). Esquisse et vues préliminaires d’un ouvrage sur l’éducation comparée [Outline and preliminary views of a work on comparative education]. Paris: L Colas. Cited in Gautherin, J. (1993: 12 fn 8).
Koehl, R. (1977). The comparative study of education: Prescription and practice. Comparative Education Review, 21(2/3), 177–194. doi:10.1086/445938.
Kogan, M. (1997). Diversification in higher education: Differences and commonalities. Minerva, 35, 47–62. doi:10.1023/A:1004285524614.
Labaree, D. F. (2006). Markets, politics, and American higher education: An institutional success story. Accessed 23 Dec 2007, from http://www.stanford.edu/%7Edlabaree/.
Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1642–1690. doi:10.1086/321300.
Lysons, A. (1990). Dimensions and domains of organisational effectiveness in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 20(3), 287–300. doi:10.1007/BF00136231.
Lysons, A., & Hatherly, D. (1996). Predicting a taxonomy of organisational effectiveness in U.K. higher educational institutions. Higher Education, 32(1), 23–39. doi:10.1007/BF00139216.
Lysons, A., Hatherly, D., & Mitchell, D. A. (1998). Comparison of measures of organisational effectiveness in U.K. higher education. Higher Education, 36, 1–19. doi:10.1023/A:1003119709379.
Macleans. (2008). Rankings. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/rankings/.
Maclennan, A., Musselbrook, K., & Dundas, M. (2000). Credit transfer at the FE/HE interface—research report for the Scottish further education funding council. Edinburgh: Scottish Further Education Funding Council.
Marginson, S. (1997a). Competition and contestability in Australian higher education, 1987–1997. Australian Universities’. Review, 40(1), 5–14.
Marginson, S. (1997b). Markets in education. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Kivinen, O., & Rinne, R. (Eds.). (1996). The mockers and the mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence, and diversity in higher education. New York: Permagon/IAU Press.
Moodie, G. (2008). From vocational to higher education: An international perspective. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Morris, H. (2005). A rank influence. Education Guardian, 9 December. Accessed 16 July 2008, from http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/comment/story/0,9828,1662118,00.html.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development (OECD). (1971). Towards new structures of post-secondary education: A preliminary statement of issues. Paris: OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). Education at a glance 2007. Paris: OECD. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,3343,en_2649_37455_39251550_1_1_1_37455,00.html.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Proposed OECD feasibility study for the international assessment of higher education learning outcomes. Accessed 15 July 2008, from http://www.oecd.org/document/22/0,3343,en_2649_35961291_40624662_1_1_1_1,00.html.
Parry, G., & Thompson, A. (2002). Closer by degrees: The past, present and future of higher education in further education colleges. Learning and Skills Development Agency. Accessed 23 Dec 2007, from http://www.lsneducation.org.uk/pubs/Pages/021164.aspx..
Ramsden, P. (1999). Predicting institutional research performance from published indicators: A test of a classification of Australian university types. Higher Education, 37, 341–358. doi:10.1023/A:1003692220956.
Robbins, L. (1963). Higher education. Report of the committee appointed by the Prime Minister under the chairmanship of Lord Robbins 1961–63. Cmnd. 2154. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
Russell Group (2008). The Russell Group. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.russellgroup.ac.uk/home.html.
Schriewer, J. (2006). Comparative social science: Characteristic problems and changing problem solutions. Comparative Education, 42(3), 299–336. doi:10.1080/03050060601022640.
Scott, P. (1995). The meaning of mass higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Institute of Higher Education (2008). Academic ranking of world universities. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm.
Shin, J. C. (2008). Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9150-4.
Stanley, G., & Reynolds, P. (1994). Similarity grouping of Australian universities. Higher Education, 27(3), 359–366. doi:10.1007/BF01432075.
Teichler, U. (2008). Diversification? trends and explanations of the shape and size of higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 349–379. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9122-8.
Tight, M. (1996). University typologies re-examined. Higher Education Review, 29(1), 57–77.
Times Higher Education (2008). World university rankings. Accessed 16 July 2008, from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/hybrid.asp?typeCode=142&pubCode=1&navcode=118.
Times Newspapers Ltd. (2008). Good universities guide. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,716,00.html.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (1997). International Standard Classification of Education. Accessed 23 Dec 2007, fromhttp://www.unesco.org/education/docs/isced_1997.htm.
US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Higher Education General Information Survey (HEGIS): Fall enrollment in colleges and universities surveys; Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall enrollment surveys. Accessed 13 Jan 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/digest/dt201.html.
US News and World Report (2008). America’s best colleges 2008. Accessed 6 July 2008, from http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/rankindex_brief.php.
Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2004). Building futures scenarios for universities and higher education: An international approach. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 245–263. doi:10.2304/pfie.2004.2.2.3.
Williams, R., & Van Dyke, N. (2007). Measuring the international standing of universities with an application to Australian universities. Higher Education, 53(6), 819–841. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-7516-4.
Williams, R., & Van Dyke, N. (2008). Reputation and reality: Ranking major disciplines in Australian universities. Higher Education, 56(1), 1–28. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9086-0.
Yogev, A. (2000). The stratification of Israeli universities: Implications for higher education policy. Higher Education, 40, 183–201. doi:10.1023/A:1004049331498.
Acknowledgments
I thank three anonymous reviewers for the journal for their insightful and helpful comments which greatly improved the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moodie, G. Four tiers. High Educ 58, 307–320 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9195-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9195-4