Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines the findings of a study employing a partial least squares (PLS) structural equation methodology to test a customer satisfaction model of the drivers of student satisfaction and loyalty in higher education settings. Drawing upon a moderately large sample of students enrolled in four ‘types’ of Australian universities, the findings suggest that student loyalty is predicted by student satisfaction, which is in turn predicted by the perceived image of the host university. While the perceived quality of “humanware” (e.g., people and process) and “hardware” (e.g., infrastructure and tangible service elements) has an impact on perceived value, this was found to be weak and indeterminate. Of most importance was the impact of the institution’s institutional image, which strongly predicted perceived value, and to a lesser extent student satisfaction. The findings have implications for newer, less prestigious universities seeking to compete in a more deregulated, market driven environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AEI. (2003). The economic benefits to Australia from international education. Canberra: Australian Education International, AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • AEI-NOOSR. (2006). Country Education Profile—Australia. Canberra, Australian Education International—National Office of Overseas Skills Recognition, Government of Australia, AGPS.

  • Australian Senate. (2001). Universities in crisis. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayol, M.-P., Foye, A., de la Tellier, C., & Tenenhaus, M. (2000). Use of PLS path modeling to estimate the European consumer satisfaction index (ECSI) model. Statistica Applicata (Italian Journal of Applied Statistics), 12(3), 361–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. K., Cronin, J. J., & Brand, R. R. (2002). Performance-only measurement of service quality: A replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 17–31. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00171-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. M. (2006). Drivers of student satisfaction and student loyalty in an Australian university setting, PhD Thesis, UWA [online available] http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2007.0060/.

  • Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: Review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 8–32. doi:10.1108/03090569610105762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassel, C. M., & Eklof, J. A. (2001). Modelling customer satisfaction and loyalty on aggregate levels: Experience from the ECSI pilot study. Total Quality Management, 12(7&8), 834–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C. (2007). Barriers to brand building in UK universities. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(1), 23–32. doi:10.1002/nvsm.271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55–68. doi:10.2307/1252296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125–131. doi:10.2307/1252256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J. J., Brady, M., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEET. (1993). National report on Australia’s higher education sector. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training, AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEST. (2006a). Learning, teaching performance fund 2006: Administrative information for providers. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEST. (2006b). Research Quality Framework, Department of Education, Science and Training, viewed 19 April 2006, http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/research_sector/policies_issues_reviews/key_issues/research_quality_framework/default.htm.

  • European Organisation for Quality. (2001). European Customer Satisfaction Index, European Organisation for Quality, viewed 9 May 2001, http://www.eoq.org/ECSI.html.

  • Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7–18. doi:10.2307/1251898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: An examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 65–87. doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.3.65.18028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Langer, M. F., & Hansen, U. (2001). Modeling and managing student loyalty: An approach based on the concept of relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 3(4), 331–344. doi:10.1177/109467050134006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDP. (2006). Australia’s exports of education services. IDP Education Australia [online]. www.idp.com.

  • Jackson, F. (2002). A better way. Eureka Street, 12(5), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S. P. (2001). The funding of higher education in Australia: Overview and alternatives. The Australian Economic Review, 34(2), 190–194. doi:10.1111/1467-8462.00188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, K., Martensen, A., & Gronholdt, L. (2000). Customer satisfaction measurement at Post Denmark: Results of application of the European customer satisfaction index methodology. Total Quality Management, 11(7), 1007–1015. doi:10.1080/09544120050135533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1997). Competition and contestability in Australian higher education, 1987–1997. Australian Universities Review, 40(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martensen, A., Gronholdt, L., & Kristensen, K. (2000). The drivers of customer satisfaction and loyalty: Cross-industry findings from Denmark. Total Quality Management, 11(4/5 & 6), 544–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (1999). Sustainable competitive advantage for educational institutions: A suggested model. International Journal of Educational Management, 13(6), 287–300. doi:10.1108/09513549910294496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). The global market for higher education: Sustainable competitive strategies for the new millennium. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L., & Wood, F. Q. (1998). Managing higher education diversity in a climate of public sector reform. Canberra: Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. (2001). Making up the numbers. The Australian, 15(August), 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. (2002). Higher education at the crossroads: An overview paper. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. (2005). Higher education report 2004–05. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, B. (2002). Education and training: How does Australia compare internationally? 1301.0 year book Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Perceived service quality as a customer-based performance measure: An empirical examination of organizational barriers using an extended service quality model. Human Resource Management, 30(3), 335–364. doi:10.1002/hrm.3930300304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M., Harman, E., Snell, W., Deden, A., & Murray, S. (2000). ECU Service 2000: A client-centred transformation of corporate services, 00/16. Canberra: Evaluations and Investigations Programme, Higher Education Division, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundle-Thiele, S. (2005). Elaborating customer loyalty: Exploring loyalty to wine retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(5), 333–344. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple-item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandukar, A. (2007). Expatriates call for university system overhaul. Business Review Weekly, 29(1), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teas, R. K. (1994). Expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: An assessment and reassessment. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 132–139. doi:10.2307/1252257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TIAC (2000). Export of western Australian education and training: Constraints and opportunities. Perth www.wa.gov.au/tiac, Technology Industry Advisory Council.

  • Turner, J. (1999). University preference: A conjoint analysis, Masters thesis, Edith Cowan University.

  • Ville, S., Valadkhani, A., & O’Brien, M. (2006). The distribution of research performance across Australian universities, 1992–2003, and its implications for building diversity. Australian Economic Papers, 45(4), 343–361. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.2006.00298.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westlund, A. H., Cassel, C. M., Eklof, J., & Hackl, (2001). Structural analysis and measurement of customer perceptions, assuming measurement and specification errors. Total Quality Management, 12(7/8), 873–881. doi:10.1080/09544120120095990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y.-T., & Dean, A. (2001). The contribution of emotional satisfaction to consumer loyalty. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(3), 234–250. doi:10.1108/09564230110393239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R., Wegner, G. R., & Massy, W. F. (2005). Remaking the American university: Market-smart and mission-centered. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia

    Robert M. Brown & Timothy William Mazzarol

Authors
  1. Robert M. Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy William Mazzarol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy William Mazzarol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, R.M., Mazzarol, T.W. The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education. High Educ 58, 81–95 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9183-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9183-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation