Abstract
This article depicts how faculty members at Mexican higher education institutions have been prepared in order to assume their professional responsibilities. It relies on three elements: First, a secondary analysis of a national faculty survey composed of 3,861 faculty members from 65 institutions; second, 34 interviews conducted in eight higher education institutions; third, a primary analysis of an institution faculty survey in a public autonomous university. Results are presented regarding the following issues: first, the central traits of anticipatory or formative in-site faculty socialization; second, the changes in the highest degree faculty obtained at entry into academic life as compared to the obtained degree at the time of the survey; third, the formative time patterns during faculty’s higher education training, fourth, the conditions of study under which faculty members obtained their graduate degrees; and fifth, the academic inbreeding phenomenon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altbach, P. G. (Ed.). (1996). The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Altbach, P. G. (1999). Harsh realities. The professoriate faces a new century. In P. G. Altbach, R. Berdahl, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 271–297). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
ANUIES (Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior). Anuarios estadísticos, México. Available: http://www.anuies.mx/estadisnew/.
ANUIES. (2006). Consolidación y avance de la educación superior en México. Temas cruciales de la agenda. México: ANUIES.
Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty. Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.
Becher, T. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Barcelona: Edit. Gedisa.
Clark, B. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation & or the Advancement of teaching.
Clark, B. (1997). Small worlds, different worlds: The uniqueness and troubles of American academic profession. Daedalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 126(4), 21–42.
Fresan, M. (2002). Formacion doctoral y autonomia intelectual. Relaciones causales [Doctoral training and intellectual autonomy. Causal relationships]. Ph.D. Dissertation. Mexico: Universidad Anahuac.
Galaz, J. F. (1998). Mexican academics at the turn of the twenty-first century. Paper presented to Dr. J. Schuster at Claremont Graduate University.
Galaz, J. F., (2002). Job satisfaction of Mexican faculty in a public state university: Institutional reality through the lens of the professoriate. Dissertation submitted to the faculty of Claremont Graduate University. Claremont, CA: Dissertation.
Garcia, S., Grediaga, R., & Landesmann, M. (2003). Los académicos en México. Hacia la constitución de un campo de conocimiento, 1993–2002 [Academics in México: Toward the development of a new field of knowledge]. In P. Ducoing (Ed.), La Investigación educativa en México: 1992–2002. México: COMIE, SEP, CESU.
Gil Anton, M., et al. (1994). Los rasgos de la diversidad: Un estudio sobre los académicos Mexicanos. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Azcapotzalco.
Gil Anton, M. (1996). The Mexican academic profession. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries (pp. 305–337). Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Gil Anton, M. (2001). An inside view of Mexican higher education: The academic profession. Nov. 1–17. Lecture presented at Claremont Graduate University, California.
Grediaga, R. (2000). Profesión académica, disciplinas y organizaciones. México: Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior, ANUIES.
Grediaga, R., Rodríguez, R., & Padilla, L. (2004). Políticas públicas y cambios en la profesión académica en México en la última década. México: ANUIES.
Padilla Glz., L. (2003). Faculty academic socialization. Strengthening the academic profession in México. Ph.D. Dissertation. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University.
Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, J. (2006). The restructuring of academic work and careers. The American Faculty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
SEP. (2006). Programa de mejoramiento del profesorado, PROMEP. Un primer análisis de su operación e impactos en el fortalecimiento académico de las universidades públicas. México: SEP, Secretaría de Educación Superior.
Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure. Community and socialization in academe. New York, NY: State University of New York Press. SUNY Series.
Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure, and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
Trow, M. A. (2000). From mass higher education to universal access: The American Advantage. Center for Studies in Higher Education. Paper CSHE1-00 (March 1). http://repositories.cdlib.org/cshe/CSHE1-00.
Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stain, E. L. (2002). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education. A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wulff D. H., & Austin A. E. (Eds.). (2004). Paths to the professoriate. Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Padilla, L.E. How has Mexican faculty been trained? A national perspective and a case study. High Educ 56, 167–183 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9096-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9096-y