Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present follow-up study examines the effect of university teachers’ pedagogical training on approaches to teaching and self-efficacy beliefs measured by Approaches to Teaching Inventory and an additional part measuring motivational strategies. The effect of pedagogical training on teaching is analysed among 35 teachers who had not participated in pedagogical courses after the first measurement in 2004 as well as among 45 teachers who had acquired more pedagogical training after the first measurement. The results showed that there were more positive changes in the measured scales among teachers who had acquired more credits of pedagogical courses since the year 2004 than among teachers who had not acquired more credits. The results of the first and second measurements are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher – Variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. G. (1999). Academics’ motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckinghamshire: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2004). Does practice make perfect? A slow and discontinuous process. In H. P. A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme, & H. Gruber (Eds.), Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert (pp. 73–95). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, M., & Gibbs, G. (2000). Can academics benefit from training? Some preliminary evidence. Teaching in HigherEducation, 5, 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eley, M. E. (2006). Teachers’ conceptions of teaching, and the making of specific decisions in planning to teach. Higher Education, 51, 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C., & Debus, R. (2002). Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. British Journal of Higher Education , 72, 483–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A., Watkins, D., & Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme. Higher Education, 42, 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Kwan, K. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Hämäläinen, K. (2004). The Bologna declaration as a tool to enhance learning and instruction at the University of Helsinki. International Journal for Academic Development, 9, 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A. (2003, August). The effect of pedagogical training and teaching experience on approach to teaching. (Paper presented at the 11th EARLI conference, Padua).

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching-scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E., & Lueckenhausen, G. (2005). How university teaching changes teachers: Affective as well as cognitive challenges. Higher Education, 49, 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instructional Science, 28, 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, L., Richardson, J. T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher education, 50, 537–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterheert, I. E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2003). Knowledge construction in learning to teach: The role of dynamic sources. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 9, 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., Katajavuori, N. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Trigwell, K. (in press). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education.

  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science teaching and learning. Learning Instruction, 4, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Suffolk: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25, 673–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson, A., & Lindberg Sand, Å. (2006, June). Compulsory higher education teacher training in Sweden – a nucleus for scholarship of teaching and learning. (Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the International Consortium for Educational Development, Sheffield).

  • Strategic plan for the years 2007–2009. University of Helsinki. (2006). Helsinki: Helsinki University Printing House.

  • Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A. (2004, June). Variation in approaches to university teaching: The role of regulation and motivation. (Paper presented at the EARLI SIG Higher Education Conference, Baltic Sea).

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Keulen, H. (2006, June). Staff development and basic teacher qualification systems in The Netherlands, with a focus on Utrecht University. (Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the International Consortium for Educational Development, Sheffield).

  • Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge Docent Erkki Komulainen for his valuable help in the data analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liisa Postareff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A. A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. High Educ 56, 29–43 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9087-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9087-z

Keywords

Navigation